If that was the bet...why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding when Mueller closed his investigation and didn't put Trump or family in prison?
If that was the bet...why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding when Mueller closed his investigation and didn't put Trump or family in prison?
3/22/2019 was the day djohn lost the bet and had to run and hide from his own thread![]()
I thought you went into hiding for a couple months but now looking back on it it was closer to a year![]()
Oh look.
What happened on 3/22/2019 that made you abandon your own thread and avoid the political forum for almost a year?
Guess you’re a ass welsher
March 2018
March 2019
What happened on March 22nd 2019 that caused you to go into hiding from the political forum for almost a year?
Poor fella can't even come up with a lie for why he went into hiding![]()
Funny you don't see TSAnon stannnig "King Spook" Mike Flynn anymore.
What happened?
https://www.americanoversight.org/am...ion-has-closedOn Friday, the Department of Justice dropped a key objection to the release of more than 4,500 pages of do ents related to the Durham investigation, the Trump-era inquiry into the origins of the FBI’s probe of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. The DOJ had previously withheld the records claiming that their disclosure would interfere with an ongoing law enforcement investigation. Instead of filing an anticipated brief that would have defended the withholdings, the department withdrew its assertion of the “ongoing investigation” exemption — strongly suggesting that the Durham investigation has been closed.
Durham putting ZERO in jumpsuits….lol investigate the investigators!
lol
5/15/2023 was the day djohn had to run and hide from another of his own threads
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=287389
The only thing true about it is that Horowitz said it. He was wrong in his conclusion and I brought this up 3 years ago how an Inspector General was limited in his investigation compared to a Special Counsel.
Crossfire Hurricane was not properly predicated as laid out here by Durham.
Although the Counterintelligence Division did eventually seek information about
Papadopoulos, the Office found no indications from witness testimony, electronic
communications, emails, calendar entries, or other do entation that, at the time, the FBI
gave any consideration to the actual trustworthiness of the information the diplomats received from Papadopoulos - an individual whom they described as, among other things,
"insecure" and "trying to impress" them. The information from Papadopoulos was clearly raw and unevaluated. It was not the
product of normal Intelligence Community collection and analysis, and it lacked the
standard caveats accompanying uncorroborated information from an individual whose
information was being seen for the first time. The information - involving an ongoing
presidential campaign - was precisely the kind of unevaluated information that required
rigorous analysis in order to assess its relevance and value. Nevertheless, the FBI
predicated Crossfire Hurricane and its subsequent investigative activities, including the use
of CHSs, undercover operations and FISA coverage, on the statements attributed to
Papadopoulos.
Thus, at the time of opening Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI had (i) publicly available
information concerning Papadopoulos's role in the campaign as a volunteer foreign policy
adviser, (ii) information obtained from Papadopoulos by the Australian diplomats, (iii)
information about Russia's likely election interference activities, (iv) Trump's public
statements about Russia, and (v) unvetted media reporting on possible ties between Trump
and Russian businessmen. Significantly, beyond this, the FBI's Counterintelligence
Division and its Crossfire Hurricane investigators did not possess any intelligence or other
vetted, corroborated information regarding Trump or his campaign staff colluding with the
Russian government. The FBI OGC Unit Chief who advised on many Crossfire Hurricane
matters and approved the case being opened as a SIM, ("FBI OGC Unit Chief-1") noted that she
lacked "knowledge of alleged ... ties between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the (Crossfire Hurricane] investigation being formally opened."249 The FBI Inspection Division
Report describes similar statements by others. As noted in that FBI internal review, "[t]his total
lack of intelligence did not appear to have been considered significant [ ]" when opening a full
investigation on persons associated with an active presidential campaign.
As the record now reflects, at the time of the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI did
not possess any intelligence showing that anyone associated with the Trump campaign was in
contact with Russian intelligence officers at any point during the campaign.
im going to spare you the part where i quote the horowitz report saying the opposite
im content to let horowitz decide what happens
horowitz was wrong grrr
![]()
as long as we are digging up old takes about the OIG![]()
If only I had known Durham was going to expose the whole thing![]()
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)