Please, everyone knows that is what you meant.
Thanks for more hypocrisy -- you never linked where I allegedly argued the fluoride used in water supplies was not an industrial waste product.
You continuously spout off about NaF in the SAWS water supply after being told directly at least three times it is not used in the SAWS water supply.2. I actually dont claim to know about SAWS water. I didnt say SAWS uses NaF. Quote me when I said I did. I SAID ITS SU IOUS. Quote me. Now. Or label yourself a liar.
Look, if you just want to confirm you are making up conspiracy theories based on your ignorance, mission accomplished.
Please answer this question with a yes or no:
Is NaF is used to fluoridate the SAWS water supply?
Yes or no.
just like pro-lifers claim there is no one forcing pregnant women to have the kid if they can give it up for adoption.
Remind me how that one came out.
With one fell swooping bumble here on cons utional law, you have managed to take out yourself, WH, and RG.
My hats off to you sir.
You say that but all I read is "bla bla bla boo hoo bla"
I mean, I don't read 9/10ths of what you post.
everyone extracted that from my su ion. I actually suspected that the timing was due to some larger scheme. Again, you lie.
Told by RG? After he started finishing my posts with his own drivel, I stopped reading his . I dont know about SAWS. I already said that. I said I was su ious. Of that I claim guilt all day. If the answer is in RGs post, I will remain ignorant.
Answer this: How the is it a conspiracy theory if there is still a debate going on? How are you settled when the authorities debating are not?
My advice: become comfortable with ambiguity. Not everything is settled. You cant nail down every loose end. If you try, you may experience heartache, and waste unnecessary time fighting losing battles.
now your getting it
ButtHurt
An inappropriately strong negative emotional response from a perceived personal insult. Characterized by strong feelings of shame. Frequently associated with a cessation of communication and overt hostility towards the "aggressor."
You claimed this, but no one prior to this post actually said they don't believe that an industrial waste product was in the water.
That is YOU making up about what others believe.
Chump asked you whether or not all the industrial waste was used or not.
Since the most likely answer "no" does not suit your theory, you ignored it.
It was a yes or no question.
Please answer with a yes or no.
Is NaF is used to fluoridate the SAWS water supply?
Yes or no.
Waiting an answer to this question.
Labeling something "industrial waste" does not make its presence in the human body in dilute amounts toxic, does it?
Still waiting on an answer to this question too.
For someone whose primary assertion on the subject is that the producers are trying to avoid court cases and injury torts, you suck at answering simple questions that would come up in any court.
that point was argued in the first five pages.
And I claimed ignorance. Why would I say definitively "no" when I dont know that to be the case? Or yes?
I know you refferred to some "invoice" at one point, but to me that was dead in the water because I wasnt claiming Toyota delivered NaF to SAWS, and you were presenting a strawman argument.
Which is also about the time you lost my readership.
Crackpot!
You got that right.
Crackpot to fence sitter in a single post.
Comedy gold.
Here is where you actively lied.
You have provided no proof of motive whatsoever, when asked repeately to do so.
Why do you have to lie to make your case?
You were told directly three times what was used to fluoridate SAWS water.
You were given a link to the information.
You aren't serious about educating yourself on this subject.
You want to remain ignorant and uneducated.
That's fine, but never expect to be taken seriously on this board.
Ever.
4 on 1 and you guys are doing good to draw even. You guys should think about another hobby!
The motive was to avoid liability to members of the general public.
This is why i dont generally read your . You like to pull out of your ass and misrep the truth.
Well, you are ignorant of a lot of things. Being ignorant of the curbstomping you got wouldn't be a surprise.
I expect some pictures will be posted.
You want so bad to take down my position and cant.
You want the three count, and the best you can do is the ol' circle jerk.
You want to readily dismiss all the cites I have presented but, that just isnt possible.
You want this to be dismissed as conspiracy, but the cites give it credibility.
Just dont expect to ever get the W here.
Curbstomping on the strawman bull you guys tied me to (Toyota sells SAWS NaF)?
As my Great-Grandpa used to say: " , please."
wtf?just like pro-lifers claim there is no one forcing pregnant women to have the kid if they can give it up for adoption.
Remind me how that one came out.
With one fell swooping bumble here on cons utional law, you have managed to take out yourself, WH, and RG.
My hats off to you sir.
It's not like that at all and I don't really have any idea what you are talking about. How did that one come out?
What is your position?
I showed pretty conclusively that you are ignorant and choose to remain so.You want the three count, and the best you can do is the ol' circle jerk.
The others did quite a good job of it. No need for me to pile on.You want to readily dismiss all the cites I have presented but, that just isnt possible.
Not at all. They are pretty poor "cites."You want this to be dismissed as conspiracy, but the cites give it credibility.
I wouldn't expect you to admit defeat, although you did admit to being ignorant and expressed your intent to remain so.Just dont expect to ever get the W here.
That's really all I need.
You think the beat down you are getting here is "even"?
I have caught you lying, ignoring questions, being too lazy to read opposing argruments and sources, and the lamest crime of all, "declaring yourself the winner".
Seriously, that is one of *the* cardinal rules of the Internet. "Declaring yourself the winner in your own thread is just... lame.
Sad, man. Just, sad.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
