Some have security reasons
"Grassley called the Democrats’ request to halt the hearing “out of order” and accused them of obstruction"
Garland?![]()
Some have security reasons
Will you drink the kool-aid upon Trumps direct order?
The United States Capitol Police said that 70 people had been arrested during the hearing; 61 were removed from the hearing room itself, and another nine from the second floor of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The charges included disorderly conduct, crowding and obstructing, the police said.
Way to go liberals only
Why are you still sucking chuck balls?
Do you like chucks balls or warren pussy the best ?
You would prefer someone like me to die then a criminal that kills a 19 year old running because he wanted to her?
Raise has nothing to do with it
He broke the law coming in
He broke he law killing him
How dare we kill someone that kills someone for justice sake
Roll eyes plenty of proof.
I do not care if he was white blue orange black red Or female or a transgender
If you do not like me you can put me on ignore unless the liberal media did not tell you how so you do not know
My wife has been married to me for 21 years
She is one hot babe
Why aren't you talking about the guy in Colorado who killed his wife and kids in colorado and then dunked them in oil?
Should he be deported too?
Trump broke the law when he ordered Cohen to pay of porn stars and skanks - are you upset?
she stuck with you through the peeing
FAKE NEWS
Seth hilarioulsy destroys Grassley with vids of Grassley (and hole Iowa)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3AW...em-uploademail
70 people arrested today at a hearing. Murdering babies is big business.
Here's ALSO JeBo saying no vote on Kagan until all her records are available
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemoc...TM2OTk0Mzg4MA/
Ayanna Pressley, Dem backed by Ocasio-Cortez, upsets Michael Capuano in Massachusetts House primary
Lol democracts
Liberal Facebook
Lisa Blatt, Self Described 'Liberal Feminist Lawyer,' Endorses Kavanaugh
HATCH: This is my fifteenth and final Supreme Court confirmation hearing. I’ve participated in the confirmation of every current Justice on the Court. I know a good nominee when I see one. And you are a great nominee.
Democrat Leahy Just Hinted at a Smoking Gun to Kavanaugh Perjury Before the Senate in Hidden Do ents
"I'm concerned because there is evidence that Mr. Miranda provided you with materials that were stolen from me."
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) used those reams of hidden and confidential do ents related to Supreme Court nominee's Brett Kavanaugh tenure with the George W. Bush administration to the best use he could Wednesday.
The line of questioning goes back to 2004, when a senior staffer for then Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist stole emails and memos from Judiciary Committee senators, including Leahy about their opposition to Bush's judicial nominees.
The staffer, Manuel Miranda, shared the memos with Republican senators and with the White House where at the time, Kavanaugh was shepherding judicial nominees through the confirmation process.
Leahy pressed
Kavanaugh, who initially insisted that he didn't know the information he received from Miranda was stolen.
This was a line of questioning for which Kavanaugh was clearly not prepared.
Leahy pressed him,
asking whether Kavanaugh though it was "at all unusual to receive a draft letter from Democratic senators to each other before any mention of it was made public?"
Here's where we get to the potential perjury Kavanaugh committed before the Senate Judiciary Committee previously.
There is apparently evidence in the materials that Grassley has marked "Committee Confidential" that would show it.
Leahy says so:
"I'm concerned because there is evidence that Mr. Miranda provided you with materials that were stolen from me.
And that would contradict your prior testimony...
there is no reason [those emails] can't be made public."
Leahy argued then with an enraged Grassley over his request to make public the Bush-era emails that Leahy is all but shouting well contain that evidence.
"There are at least 6 do ents that are marked committee confidential" related to this, Leahy said.
Those do ents, judging by the remainder of Leahy's questioning,
relate to potential perjury from Kavanaugh on warrantless wiretapping and torture.
Grassley and team ... hiding something.
They may very well be hiding the fact that Kavanaugh lied to the Senate in 2006.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...dden-do ents
booker had me in s ches yesterday with his usual woe is me act.
Kavanaugh lost his composure. He is clearly lying now but continues to insist he was truthful then and truthful now. Durbin exposed him clearly. Durbin cornered him and then sat back and allowed k to stutter and try to over compensate as his face grew red. And redder. K was later exposed as a partisan tool when - after- preaching about SC precedent - Durbin exposed him again on a ruling involving undo ented workers. Durbin cornered him again and exposed k’s dissent as basically k using a SC precedent as an “ a la carte” menu to side with corporate agendas.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)