Reply With Quote
Delaware courts are particularly rigid with out of state lawyers admitted in Delaware pro hac, Lin Wood is probably ed there.
please post more fake news tweets and made up excel spreadsheets Derplaughing at your psychosis has been a pleausre
Lin Wood is such a ing re
Wisconsin judge ruled 200,000 Joe Biden votes are illegitimate.
tick tock
Sneaky Dems scared of the nuclear option
charliemurphy.gif
Sneaky Dems scared of the nuclear option
What a day
Bend over, I'll run an election in a key battleground state
Which judge?
What's the nuclear option, Qhris?
Sneaky Dems scared of the nuclear option
Republicans voted for it too. They could have insisted the provision be tossed, but for some reason they did not.
Sneaky Dems scared of the nuclear option
Republican party is infested just like the Dems.
All of them are on the take $$$
Stop...
if undertaken, the challenge could backfire on Drumpf.
Truth scares the oligarchy.
Sneaky Dems scared of the nuclear option
6000 page bill and 6 hours to read it
AZ Judge weighing sanctions against the AZ GOP
https://arizonaslaw.blogspot.com/202...-awarding.htmlThe judge who dismissed the Arizona Republican Party's lawsuit challenging Maricopa County's hand count audit methodology has issued a detailed opinion excoriating the party's "futile" lawsuit and indicating that he is close to awarding sanctions against the party and its attorneys.
Reaching back to fraud allegations between Arizona's *first* two Governors, Superior Court Judge John Hannah also found a very appropriate summation for this year's post-election campaign by President Donald Trump and his Republican allies. He was explaining why challenges to election procedures that can be brought *before* the election cannot be brought afterwards:
The temptation to actual fraud and corruption on the part of the candidates and their political supporters is never so great as when it is known precisely how many votes it will take to change the result; and men who are willing to sell their votes before election will quite as readily sell their testimony afterwards, especially as the means of detecting perjury and falsehood are not always at hand until after the wrong sought to be accomplished by it has become successful and the honest will of the people has been thwarted.That nugget came from the 1917 Arizona Supreme Court case between George W.P. Hunt and Thomas E. Campbell. The two men were Arizona's first two Governors*, and the opinion sorts out multiple theories of fraud.
Back in the present day, Judge Hannah noted that the AZGOP could have challenged Maricopa County's decision to audit 2% of vote centers instead of 2% of precincts months earlier and had no good reason to wait, and that it could have challenged it for future elections. "That it did not do so demonstrates that its real interest was not the audit procedure as such. The real issue, evidently, was the outcome of the 2020 election."
Hannah notes the statute that indicates that he will consider "whether the Republican Party and its attorneys brought the case in bad faith to delay certification of the election or to cast false shadows on the election's legitimacy." (Footnote 4 indicates the judge is trying to figure out whether AZGOP's attorneys - Jack Wilenchik and company - knew that the hand count audit had been completed before the suit was filed.)
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...us/6539363002/The issue of indefinite confinement was also raised in a lawsuit President Donald Trump brought against election officials after narrowly losing the state to Democrat Joe Biden.
The state Supreme Court ruled in favor of elections officials and Biden in that case later Monday.
thuggish, really
Chris
What real numbers look like.
https://tv.gab.com/channel/joeljustw...365be5f4bf6ceb
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
