Trump's base will never ditch him, and anyone who goes against him in the GOP is done in a primary.
4th time
My general working theory is that self-identified conservatives aren't honest. Not answering good faith, honest questions tend to support that.
Is it acceptable for a president to ask for assistance from foreign governments for dirt on political rivals?
Trump's base will never ditch him, and anyone who goes against him in the GOP is done in a primary.
Mitt would survive, but otherwise it would have to be someone on the way out or out of office. They would still lose, but the right guy could be effective.
The IC amended 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5) on their own?
You’re probably right, but the political calculus could change. Never underestimate the survival instinct.
Trump isn’t as well liked as stalwart GOP Ongressional support would seem to indicate.
Agreed on both items.
They have chosen the hill to die on.
My take:
A president can be removed if this Congress determines that the president's conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in his/her role, because impeachment is not about punishment.
Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office of the Presidency.
Why?
The IG found the claim credible.
You deal only in conspiracy theories, Darrin.
New form
Old form
![]()
Interviewing witnesses and putting it in a report is hearsay.
Hearsay!
Trump's not liked at all by his party, but he is loved by his party's voters. His party pretends they're a conservative party but his voters know they're really a white iden y party.
What's your conspiracy theory this time, Darrin?
Step up.
The policeman didn’t see the crime, his report is corrupt!
Yeah, my eyes work.
You realize that "first hand knowledge" is not a statutory requirement - and congress left it to the ICIG to make determinations of credibility.
My general working theory is that self-identified conservatives aren't honest. Not answering good faith, honest questions tend to support that.
Is it acceptable for a president to ask for assistance from foreign governments for dirt on political rivals?
LOL becoming Deep State truther because you hate the libs
It's almost like there is some sort of pattern here.
It doesn't appear to be a requirement as of the latest revision of that form
What do you think takes precedence - a form or an enabling statute?
what’s your hypothesis about that?
how is it interesting?
Was it ever required by law, Darrin?
Yes or no.
Also still waiting on your conspiracy theory.
I didn't even mention the Ukraine timeline.
You’re being coy.
In another thread a few hours ago you said the House Judiciary Commitee voted money for an investigation before they knew what they were investigating.
You were mistaken about that.
Goes to talking out your ass.
Yeah why secretly makes you think this was planned. We must stop trump we will secretly change rules then get him
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)