You took an extra dose of re this morning.
Its a ban and he himself called it a ban. So what would you call revoking visas?
You took an extra dose of re this morning.
So you never served. Got it.
Show some examples of classified information being stored on unsecured servers by the GOP.
Now you have two tasks since you keep making these baseless claims:
1. List the muslim countries that built the US
2. Show that confidential/classified information is being transmitted from and stored on unsecured servers by the GOP.
I think people assume Muslims in the middle east are similar to the Muslims they know in America who are largely secular.
Bill Clinton turned away refugees from Haiti during his administration. More specifically, he had them sent to Gitmo and then deported back to Haiti from there:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...a97_story.html
When Bill was governor of Arkansas, he begged Carter to do the same thing with Cuban refugees. After being flatly rejected, he finally agreed to take in 20,000 refugees under the condition that they were kept interned at a military base:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...intons-career/
I don't recall any outrage from Hillary over either of these incidents. Nor have I ever seen any outrage from supporters of the Clintons. Why is it okay for the Clintons to police our borders but a conservative who does it is "racist" and "fascist"?
the pre nov 16 elitist democratic meltdowns threatening to leave to demographically uniform (read: white) countries with high median incomes and vastly stricter immigration vetting
I don't care what he calls it. I care about the actual policies put into place by the executive order. Calling it a "Muslim ban" doesn't change the fact that it's a temporary pause that doesn't even affect most Muslim-majority countries.
This refugee thing is a losing battle for the left, tbh. America doesn't want to open the flood gates for refugees the way Germany has, and I know plenty of liberals (myself included) who agree with that.
The left should focus on issues that Americans actually agree with rather than continuing to try and win muh culture war. All of this effort would be much better if it was focused on calling Trump out for the financial industry dergulation he wants.
It should not affect any. Oh and Pence disagrees with you.
trump s
You're right. Open borders have been a huge success for Europe, after all.
They don't have a word for secular over there. Erbil was the only place I felt like I wasn't gonna get snackbar'd tbh.
As if it did not take multiple subpoenas over near a dozen investigations for the alleged classified material to come to light. It started when the word of the nonsecured server came to light in a Benghazi hearing. Same level of information we have now and the outrage started right from the start.
Acting like two years of investigation is the same as it stands before any investigation is done.
Because if you build the wall near Mexico they can't just come around.
Like you still won't have homegrown terrorists.
It doesn't help that one of his acolytes, Gulliani like the ungraceful idiot that he is flat out stated explcitly that Trump went to him and asked straight up how to implement a 'Muslim ban' legally.
The alternative to this EO is not "open borders" or "opening the floodgates." We were already only letting in a very small number of refugees.
And the order goes far beyond resettlement.
Howard Stern is a flaming liberal. He admit that he would turn on you if he didn't agree with your policies. Definitely an alterior motive there. Obviously, he is still butthurt Hillary lost.
I like this ban because it lets me know which Muslim countries are evil, and which ones have Trump hotels.
A wall alone isn't going to stop illegal immigration, nor is anybody claiming that. But a wall is valuable as one part of a strong border security plan, as other countries (i.e. Israel, Hungary) have proven.
I fail to see how securing our borders somehow prevents the government from also cracking down on homegrown terrorism.Like you still won't have homegrown terrorists.
I like when people parrot this conspiracy because it lets me know who doesn't know what they're talking about.
The floodgates were already being opened. We went from taking in only 36 Syrian refugees in 2013 to 105 in 2014 to 1,682 in 2015 to over 13,000 in 2016. Needless to say, that's a rapid increase in just four years. If Hillary got in, she would have gone full Merkel and opened our borders up wide.
Is that why when he ran he ran as a libertarian? He has repeatedly shat on Al and Tipper and Democratic FCC policy.
I guess when you are an ideological puritan different = flaming liberal.
Yeah some things happened in Syria since 2013 that caused refugee numbers to increase. 13K is still a drop in the bucket. We're nowhere near Germany numbers.
Last edited by Spurminator; 02-05-2017 at 03:09 PM.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)