and yet, the fall from grace continues with a 19 point disgraceful loss with the big 3 in tact. You better keep those memories alive--b/c there will be NO more rings for Duncan, pendejo.
I was on the Luke bandwagon after he had that contract year in 2006-2007. I quickly got off.
and yet, the fall from grace continues with a 19 point disgraceful loss with the big 3 in tact. You better keep those memories alive--b/c there will be NO more rings for Duncan, pendejo.
other fan never learn, spurs don't care about the regular season, if there's a spurs-rockets series in the play-offs, the spurs will win easily 4-1
No seriously though, you guys played well. For your own good though dont take too much from it its only one game.
First, the big 3 wasnt really intact.
Parker played 26 minutes, and more importantly we were better than you guys when he was on the court (+4), its only his second game back to boot.
Manu played like 2008 T-Mac
Duncan played like playoffs Yao
And Luther Head had his one good game of the season.
4 rings.
It's above everything else.
Anything you guys say will fail because of this.
I laugh at future attempts to respond.
Haha.
and Ha.
keep dreaming.
does this fail for you to:
hoto
According to the red in the above quote from you, this fails ( ):
![]()
That's okay you stupid ass Rockets fans!! It's only the regular season, and trust me we are not worried about you guys. you guys can never get past the Utah Jazz and you think you can beat the SPURS in a seven game series?...Keep ing dreaming dumbasses!!!You guys haven't got close to these since the departure of Hakeem and I don't see him coming through your door anytime soon!!!....
![]()
enjoy the past b/c the spurs have no future. the off noob.
Talk all you want about your 4 rings, but the fact remains is the Rockets will alway be the first team in Texas to win the O'brien. Plus have done what the Spurs never could and that's win back to back.I'm sure the replies about it being so long ago blah blah.Just like the Spurs les, it's in the past.
Sigh.
Another year, another fan of another team advising Spurs fans that the Spurs are done.
Sigh.
See, this is a prime example. It reads like Mavericks fan, circa 2006 or 2007.
LOL at Rockets fans who bashed us after the Rockets-Spurs game.
Now you understand how hard back-to-back games are
Since June 14, 2007.
Actually, I guess the Spurs didn't get their rings until October 30, 2007. But who's counting?
How many the Spurs have doesn't matter just as much as when Houston won theirs doesn't matter.
Neither team currently has the trophy and that is what matters.
You're confused. The Spurs have no NBA championships to speak of.
Tru dat.![]()
"these are not the droids you are looking for"
![]()
ha, good post
I'm curious..
You dismissed the "4 rings" argument for being in the past. (which I agree with) so then why drop the "well Houston won it first" Isn't that also in the past?
I guess it's all been a dream -- one of a dream.
Those les between both teams were won in the past right?.Are the Spurs the current champs?Is it only fair when Spurs fans bring up their rings, but not the Rockets fans?If the Spurs fans can brag about les that were not won consecutively then why can't we brag about our team winning back to back when when in fact they're still the lone team in the state to do so?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)