He's referring almost verbatim to another thread.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=127000
I am actually pro-life but the actions of many others who are make me look bad- such as sending or allowing a kid to wear something like that to an elementary school. It is stated that it is a K-8 school which means kids as young as 5 years old are there. It is not the appropriate place for this display.
Rhetorical. Children have extremely limited to no rights while in school buildings.
Is that ok? Not in my book, but that hasnt been published yet.
By the description I read, there is nothing inappropriate about the shirt.
Have a picture of the shirt by chance?
Was it appropriate for the school to embarrass the kid, or could they have handled that better?
Do you approve of the intimidation tactics used by the school?
Where is the appropriate place for a child to learn of the vicious world we hand to them?
Sooner the better? Or resentment and mistrust when they find out the happy-go-lucky bull the adults/tv have been selling is exactly that?
Come now, lets not re-re-redirect this discussion towards a line of thinking that shelters people (children or adult) from having their sensibilities offended.
She/he was bold enough to wear the shirt, he/she is bold enough to have their feelings hurt, vis a vis.
children should be seen and not heard
..and get the off my lawn!!
right.. of course you don't necessarily have all of your rights available when you are in school. do you have the right to not go to school?Right. 'tis better for students to learn about their cons utional rights as historical subjects instead of actually exercising them. More accurate too, IMO.
\
stop acting stupid. schools can tell you what to wear, what kind of haircut you can have and so on..
don't be stupid
Have you ever had a five year old kid?
The people who are defending this are the one's without children.
Two, they are now both over 21.
Your point?
You first.
kids can't do what they want when in school. very simple so your notion of cons utional rights in this case is wrong. admit it.
Sure, but that doesn't mean infringements on one's cons utional rights are at the discretion of the school management. This isn't a prison and even prisoners actually have cons utional rights.
I am all for wearing whatever t shirt you want to in public. i am pro free speach but you can't cause disruptions in school which is what this t shirt did. schools have been limiting student's rights for a long time now..
Kids do not lose their full cons utional rights in school. There are limited curtailments which are allowed in order to facilitate instruction.
Was the disruption caused by fellow students or simply was a reaction of an administrator?
Of course, I guess you could say that this helps train the children for corporate life. Convenient, no?
So the plaintiffs would want other kids to be able to wear "Abort Baby Jesus" t-shirts as well.
It was a distraction... how hard is that to comprehend?
So much for the disruption claim.
"Other inappropriate subject matter." Nice.
This reminds me of whoever was fine with cops searching their car at will without cause.
That probably wouldn't garner their support, but that doesn't change the validity of their claim.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
