I call this pure BS.
Let's compare the regular season numbers for jumpshots and for shots with 3 or less seconds in the clock:
Player eFG% (for jumpshots)
Manu .479 (59% of his total attempts)
Wade .389 (53% of his total attempts)
Manu is better by +9.0%
Wade does not have a better jumpshot than Manu, not by a long margin.
Let's see what happened with the possesion time running out (essentially a low percentage shot for most players):
Player eFG% (21+ seconds in the shot clock)
Manu .520 (13% of his total attempts)
Wade .466 (12% of his total attempts)
Manu is better by +5.4%
Oh... but may be you want to compare the playoffs numbers.
Player eFG% (for jumpshots)
Manu .519 (65% of his total attempts)
Wade .444 (59% of his total attempts)
Manu is better by +7.5%
Manu's jumpshot in the playoffs is still significantly better.
Player eFG% (21+ seconds in the shot clock)
Manu .533 (18% of his total attempts)
Wade .563 (7% of his total attempts)
Wade is better by +3.0%. In this case, please consider that Wade has a significanlty lower percentage of attempts than Manu.
These stats prove categorically that Manu is definitely a better jumpshoter, and at the very least, similar in terms of effectiveness when the clock is running down.
Also note that we are comparing two of the elite guards (arguably 2 of the best 5, may be even 2 of the best 3) in the entire league, and Manu still comes ahead.
No matter how you compare them, Manu has better stats.
The PPS obviously factor in FTs.
PPS: PTS/FGA (including points from FTs)
Regular season PPS
Manu 1.52 (tied 2nd with Shaq)
Wade 1.41 (tied 11th with Dirk)
Playoffs PPS
Manu 1.85 (1st and ing increadible!)
Wade 1.46 (14th)
May be you don't like that Manu is aggressive, goes to the line a lot, gets many FTs and convert a high percentage of them in points. Let's factor out the FTs using the AFG%.
AFG%: Adjusted FG Percentage = [(PTS - FTM)/FGA]/2
ADJ FG% measures shooting efficiency by taking into account the total points a player produces through his field goal attempts. The intention of this adjustment is largely to evaluate the impact of three-point shooting. For ex: If Shaquille O'Neal has 3-5 FG, all two-point shots for 6 points, then his ADJ FG% = [(6/5)]/2 = .600. Meanwhile, if Ray Allen is 2-5 FG, but his 2 FGM are both three-pointers for 6 points, then his ADJ FG% = [(6/5)]/2 = .600
Regular season AFG%
Manu .533 (tied 15th with Billups)
Wade .483 (tied 67th with J. Crawford)
Playoffs AFG%
Manu .604 (8th)
Wade .509 (30th)
Ohh... but the reason for this is that Manu is a much better 3pt shooter, so this is not a fair comparison for Wade. Ok, ok, I'll give you no FTs, and no 3pters. Is this better for Wade? Let's compare the 2pt-FG%
Regular season 2pt-FG%
Manu .517 (26th)
Wade .485 (61th)
Playoffs 2pt-FG%
Manu .556 (8th)
Wade .520 (28th)
I have sliced it in almost any way possible. Are you convinced now?
To conclude, Manu is a better jumpshoter than Wade, he is at least comparable (if not better) when the clock is running down. He is a more effective player, he goes to the line more aggresively, he is a better 3pt shooter, and he is a better 2pt shooter.
Edit: my sources are:
82games.com
ESPN

Reply With Quote
. I am just trying to point out the flaw or area of the game in which Manu does not really excel at (and there are not many areas where he is at least not good or very good at).

