Who would you cut after this game? - Cavs game edition

[ChumpDumper]

For real. I'm gone now.

You sure?

Must have been pretty important for you to go back on your word like that.

[DPG21920]

lol, damn.

[The Truth #6]

The regular season must be getting close.

[slick'81]

damn i havent seen any preseason must have missed alot lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I have a question for you.

Has the season started?

Question: which team is best?

[chasky]

Gee

[Giuseppe]

Gee/Gist/Simmons/Neal/Penney/Temple all could be cut and seemingly would make no impact.

Cutting Neal would grant ya's immediate relief. No more rapist like us saddled with Kobe.

You guys would be like in hog heaven, eh?

[Cessation]

Neal got a 3 year deal, he's not getting cut. Simmons looks alright, between him and the promising James Anderson, I'm sure they'll do an adequate job covering the 16 minutes of backup sf, vs other teams second unit sf, lol. If not, we still got manu and hill, since we loaded at sg, these days. Lets not overreact about this "glaring hole".

[#2!]

great thread

DPG won

[#2!]

Neal got a 3 year deal, he's not getting cut. Simmons looks alright, between him and the promising James Anderson, I'm sure they'll do an adequate job covering the 16 minutes of backup sf, vs other teams second unit sf, lol. If not, we still got manu and hill, since we loaded at sg, these days. Lets not overreact about this "glaring hole".

People aren't worried about how they'll fair against 2nd unit. The concern is that we don't appear to have anyone to put up against starters if our own starters' defense isn't enough, or if their shots aren't falling. And since the Spurs are a western conference team then every comparison should be made against the lakers, and while we have plenty of great backups, we should strive to have a backup as good or better than the lakers at every position. We don't at 2nd string SF, Matt Barnes may not be a star, but as far as anyone can tell he kicks the out of Gee, Temple, and in all likelihood Bobby Simmons.

Edit: as usual, left out a small but important word in my rush.

[Cessation]

I wasn't talking about a defensive stopper on the wing, like bowen. I'm talking about a backup sf. Pop mentioned it should be someone real good defencivelly or if not he has to make up for it with great shooting. Barnes is a borderline journeyman scrub, defensive specialist and spot up shooter. OMG how are we going to stop Mat Barnes??? Bet that keeps Pop up at night !! lol
Seriously though, Anderson, Simmons, Manu, Hill, have a descent chance of "containing" the force that is Mat Barnes

[spectator]

is it still funny to yell get a room/thread?

[#2!]

I'm not saying we can't stop Matt Barnes from scoring. I meant he can guard our wing players, but our back up SF can't guard their starters.

Emoticons make a post look confident, good usage.

[Cessation]

Quite so, thats why they are called backup sf, they'll spend most of their time guarding other teams backup sf, while our starting sf will be spending most of the time guarding the other teams starting sf. Am I making any sense?

We actually match up well enough vs the lakers, artest vs jefferson. Artest isn't really an offencive threat anymore, he mainly defends for them. Jefferson is athletic and strong enough to cover artest. I'd say its a tie. Same with the back up sf, no great advantage, for either team.

[UnWantedTheory]

I'm not saying we can't stop Matt Barnes from scoring. I meant he can guard our wing players, but our back up SF can't guard their starters.

Emoticons make a post look confident, good usage.

He is not getting the point anytime soon, so I would just leave it be.

[UnWantedTheory]

I did? I said that after what I have seen, I would cut them all and be ok with it. If you could link to where I said I saw the game and made a judgment, I will certainly apologize.

I posted in this thread on the subject of cutting players, but I never implied or said I watched this game.

He is obviously twisting your words around to with you...But if not, than he most certainly has a problem you cant solve by arguing over something he isnt capable of understanding.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

You sure?

Must have been pretty important for you to go back on your word like that.

Chumpdumper for all the laurels you rest on and all the props you get about being a girder expert, you can seriously be the most unnecessary poster on this board ever and that goes for spurs, nba, and political forums.

Anyone can do what you do and pick out little to divert conversation but DPG's main point was pretty clear and valid you just have to shift the whole conversation for no reason AT ALL.

When it comes down to it you are really nothing more than an uncrude troll.

[Cessation]

Why don't you enlighten me in your wisdom, unwantedtheory, as to this "point" i'm missing?

[ChumpDumper]

Chumpdumper for all the laurels you rest on and all the props you get about being a girder expert, you can seriously be the most unnecessary poster on this board ever and that goes for spurs, nba, and political forums.

Anyone can do what you do and pick out little to divert conversation but DPG's main point was pretty clear and valid you just have to shift the whole conversation for no reason AT ALL.

When it comes down to it you are really nothing more than an uncrude troll.

U mad?

I resent that. I can be quite crude.

[Cessation]

lol he mad

[DrSteffo]

Gist. This thread was trolled to death by attention seeking trolls already I know.

[ceperez]

What is so funny? When I meant by the Spurs needs was the back up SF spot. No one that they brought in looks good enough. I would not mind cutting all of them an no one has stood out. It sucks that none of the prospects look like NBA players.

The Spurs main guys are fine, but the glaring hole at the SF spot needs to be addressed and it does not appear that it is going to happen from within.

Gee/Gist/Simmons/Neal/Penney/Temple all could be cut and seemingly would make no impact.

The Spurs fringe players all came up craps.

Agree. Worthless bums... throw them out!