Reply With Quote
Oh great, the "I'm a trendy moderate who's not a Democrat or Republican!" soapbox.
lol confirmation bias.So all these Republicans saying Obama = Bush, are you cheese s ready to finally admit George Bush was a horrible president
You guys constantly defend Bush and his abortion of a presidency, then compare Obama to Bush like it's a bad thing in your eyes.
lol you guys.
Oh great, the "I'm a trendy moderate who's not a Democrat or Republican!" soapbox.
Oh great, the "I lack critical thinking skills so I'm just gonna sling !" soapbox.
I don't really think that would be a soapbox
Maybe your critical thinking needs improvement
You need to spend more time here, tbh.
You'd learn to recognize that particular soapbox fairly quickly. It's usually occupied by DarrinS.
Anyone with a room temperature IQ can grok that coyotes_geek ain't exactly trendy.
Nothing like a "trendy moderate" with a soapbox to take the fun out of a "your team sucks, my team rules" pom-pom waiving contest. Perhaps darrin, jacob or WC would be willing to accomodate you.
Anyone with a room temperature IQ can grok that coyotes_geek ain't exactly trendy.
Giving Barrack another term would be like giving Murdoff another shot at your investments.
"claiming to be wise, they became fools"
Murdoff? You mean Bernie Madoff?
Totally, thank you.
"May the Lord, the God of Israel, under whose wings you have come to take refuge, reward you fully for what you have done"
Is this supposed to be funny or are you all about the Jesus now?
strawman #2. poor dudes are getting their ass kicked by you.
Reread your post saying McCain would've been "much more like Bush"; reread mine saying "that's pretty much impossible"; reread yours (uninformed) saying "Obama has gotten into less wars [than McCain would have]" even though both would have followed the Bush timetable; reread mine saying Obama has gotten into or out of the same amount of wars as either McCain or another president would have, PLUS Libya; and then get emotionally charged (IE asshurt), and maybe argue another strawman, finally followed by commit an ad hominem fallacy when you call me a bean3r like usual because that's the best you've got.
I've spelled it out for you; if you don't understand your own emotionally charged, purely speculative 'argument' enough to follow it up and understand mine and others' disagreements with it (which you haven't thus far) then that is not our problem, but yours.
Last edited by z0sa; 03-06-2012 at 03:41 PM.
People bashed Bush because he took his eye off the ball. Plain and simple. Bush was just fine and had the support of America after 9/11 but for some reason one war wasn't enough and he decided to turn his attention to Iraq. Brilliant move. That's where everything shifted and the people turned against him. If a president and his administration are dumb enough to go out and make case after case for rushing into war, puts troops in harm's way while telling the enemy to "bring it on" from the comfort of the white house, blows up the country, makes the American taxpayers foot the bill to rebuild the , then has no exit strategy while troops are getting killed by the guys he told to "bring it on" you're going to have quite a few angry people bash your stupid ass. If Obama did something that in dumb he would have gotten the same ridicule. Thankfully, Obama isn't THAT stupid.
Bush was a dumbass and caused massive damage to America and the entire world but at least he was able to get done. Obama hasn't accomplished anything as president. Bush started two wars, added a department of the federal government, and may have possibly been behind 9/11.
President Bush = President Obama
Bush 2000 > Obama 2008
If Bush had been like his year 2000 version, he would have been a good president.
You just said a president you think could be behind the 9/11 attacks is not the worst president in history.
.
Dumper, will you give me a dollar every time you call me a ? I could really use a vacation.
If Bush was behind 9/11, is he really the worst president ever? If he was behind 9/11, that would mean that people underestimated his intelligence. If Bush and Cheney were behind 9/11, wouldn't they make them evil geniuses?
Why? What's wrong with it?
If Bush was behind 9/11, is he really the worst president ever? If he was behind 9/11, that would mean that people underestimated his intelligence. If Bush and Cheney were behind 9/11, wouldn't they make them evil geniuses?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions