Reply With Quote
Happy Holidays to you and yoursspelling nazi with the up goods
im happy if you're happy. Enjoy your evening.Wow you got me on det one. Oh no...I said det and not that. Congrats on cementing yourself as a Kidd K level, grammar policing got.
Since indians represent almost a tenth of your population, I looked it up to see what the exact number was...only to find out there is only like 3.8 million people in that ty wasteland of a state that you live in. Pretty ing sad. That's less than the the combined population of Dallas and Tarrant counties. rofl.
Since you are a person that likes facts, here's some that I stumbled upon...Over a forty year period, from 1970 to 2010, Oklahoma's entire state population only increased by a little over a million people. The whole ing state. Did you know that Dallas County by itself increased by a million people over that time? ...even San Antonio alone increased by 700k.
It's pretty obvious the difference between Oklahoma and Texas. People are coming to/staying in Texas, not barren, worthless holes like Oklahoma. If they were actually the same as you suggest, wouldn't your entire state population increase more over long periods of time than some Texas counties have?
Happy Holidays to you and yours
Texas is huuuge. I realize the gross number of people is drastically different. You do skew things a bit using gross figures between two states if such different size. Either way the people, in large part and in many areas of the two states share similar ways of life, beliefs, economic backbones,etc. Texas is much more diverse and some areas are quite different than OK, but at the same time also very different than other parts of the state. Clearly, much of TX is "barren wasteland" as you call OK. I assume you have seen parts of TX besides the metro areas..?Wow you got me on det one. Oh no...I said det and not that. Congrats on cementing yourself as a Kidd K level, grammar policing got.
Since indians represent almost a tenth of your population, I looked it up to see what the exact number was...only to find out there is only like 3.8 million people in that ty wasteland of a state that you live in. Pretty ing sad. That's less than the the combined population of Dallas and Tarrant counties. rofl.
Since you are a person that likes facts, here's some that I stumbled upon...Over a forty year period, from 1970 to 2010, Oklahoma's entire state population only increased by a little over a million people. The whole ing state. Did you know that Dallas County by itself increased by a million people over that time? ...even San Antonio alone increased by 700k.
It's pretty obvious the difference between Oklahoma and Texas. People are coming to/staying in Texas, not barren, worthless holes like Oklahoma. If they were actually the same as you suggest, wouldn't your entire state population increase more over long periods of time than some Texas counties have?
State of Oklahoma - 69,898 square miles
County of Dallas - 908 square miles
Both increased by roughly 1 million residents over a 40 year period.
So how does the size of the state of Texas give the county of Dallas such an unfair, and skewed advantage in it growth of population, in comparison to the entire state of Oklahoma?
nvm I keep forgetting you are from Oklahoma. Should we really expect you to know the answer to such a simple question?
lol stretch
lol raiders
lol al davis still lives
lol fml
To put that in perspective....this:
...grew as much as this:
Smelt is, in fact, a past tense form of the word smell. It is used mostly by people who are from outside of North America, who I guess would be really difficult to find in the asshole of North America, where no foreigner would want to go
http://grammarist.com/spelling/smelled-smelt/
It seems as though you've taken my statement that Texas and Oklahoma are the same quite literally. You've chosen to use population statistics as your basis for why Texas is a great state and Oklahoma is a barren wasteland of trash. I do realize the great population increases in certain areas of Texas and clearly there is some positive things going on there to draw such an increase in people. However, those enormous metro areas are certainly not for everyone's taste. My statement that OK and TX are the same was in reference to the fact that we're both states in the same region, OVERALL similar political views, economic backbones, ways of life, etc. Certainly TX is much, much bigger as are their metropolitan areas. OKC is what one would consider a small city. Some people enjoy living in a smaller city. I'm not sure why you choose to be juvenile and refer to an entire state as a wasteland of trash because of the great difference in city sizes, when your state is basically the same in other aspects. Do you venture outside of DFW, SA, Houston, or wherever you live? Do you go to the panhandle of TX? Do you go ANYWHERE else in TX? THe overwhelming square mileage of TX is uninhabited. It's barren land. People farm it, drill it...it's the foundation of your state. Are you too ignorant to realize this? Do you discount those farmers and oil field workers who live and thrive in the barren and unpopulated areas of your great state?
It doesn't. I am well aware that the population of the DFW metroplex far excedes that of the entire state of OK. OK is mostly unpopulated, just as Texas is - a lot of farm land. OK has two cities, both of which are small cities. Texas, by comparison, has huge metropolitan areas. There's no comparison. I simply meant that in terms of comparing populations between 2 states of such drastic size differences, one would have to take that square mileage into consideration. I wasn't simply referring to the DFW population comparison that was given.
Oh, the irony.
Well thought out response...and way to ignore the questions posed to you in my previous post. You won't answer them because it will make you look as foolish as some of your responses have been.
As I've stated - it's apparent you took my statement about OK and TX being "the same damn thing" a little too literally. Sometimes one must use common sense and not take everything in the total literal sense. Clearly, there are differences...that's kind of a given, don't you think? It goes without saying that TX metropolitan areas dwarf those of Oklahoma. What I meant (AGAIN), by my non-literal statement that OK and TX are the same is the fact that the vast majority of both states is farm land - or as you like to call "barren wasteland" or a " hole". You think those TX farmers agree with you on that assessment? And do you think those TX farmers and oil field workers who work in that "wasteland" aren't an enormous part of Texas's current economy and history? You seem to be ting on the majority of your beloved state by your comments.
Jack has a beef with some fella named Serg Abaka. Undeserved fine, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
