Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 94
  1. #51
    Soft Like Twinkie Filling Juggity's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Post Count
    6,564
    Q: When was the last time an NBA team won with a dominant big as their leading scorer?
    Pau wasn't the leading scorer, but he was pretty clearly the spiritual leader of the 2009 and 2010 Lakers championship team, given Kobe's attempt to chuck away the finals, particularly in 2010.

    Dirk was the leading scorer for the 2011 Mavs, and has a dominant flamingo jumpshot precisely because of his height.

    So, tbh, last year was an anomaly in terms of a championship team lacking the dominant big.

  2. #52
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    So wait -- is thread just a subtle Trade Parker thread?

  3. #53
    Believe. benstanfield's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    1,743
    TP is a dynamic, transcendent offensive threat capable of facilitating for teammates or going into God Mode in critical moments. This as well as a stout defense have been shown to be the critical ingredients of championship teams. I think position is really irrelevant, and the fact that PG's have not served in this role commonly is merely a correlation, not a causal argument for saying that it can't be done.

  4. #54
    Veteran Big Empty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,314
    hmmm, u have the Pistons with Thomas but they did have quality bigs in Rodman and Lambeer. Then you go to Magic, but he is 6'10 and won with Abdul Jabbar. I see where you're going with this. I kinda agree

  5. #55
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    we are not beating the Heat. wake the up

  6. #56
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    I though that was clear, but perhaps not. Let's go back to the OP.



    Now, before we go any further, would you please list those players who meet your definition of a dominant big? This must be a very a short list as it will only contain players that can make the Spurs into legit contenders in your eyes, while trading away the considerable assets necessary to convince another team to give up such a player. Once you've identified these players, we can go on.
    Well, somebody like LaMarcus Albridge from the Blazers, Al Horford from the Hawks, I would love to have Brook Lopez, but I believe thats out of our league. Or we can try to get a young big whos dominating at the age of 22, from Orlando Nikola Vucevic. Another young guy catching my eye is from the Raptors, 20 years old, Jonas Valanciunas. This bigs are very tradeable, for the exeption of Mr. Lopez. But I can only imaging Nikola from Orlando, under Pops system and learning from the great Tim Duncan.

  7. #57
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Well, somebody like LaMarcus Albridge from the Blazers, Al Horford from the Hawks, I would love to have Brook Lopez, but I believe thats out of our league. Or we can try to get a young big whos dominating at the age of 22, from Orlando Nikola Vucevic. Another young guy catching my eye is from the Raptors, 20 years old, Jonas Valanciunas. This bigs are very tradeable, for the exeption of Mr. Lopez. But I can only imaging Nikola from Orlando, under Pops system and learning from the great Tim Duncan.
    Reread your first post. You said that 2013 Duncan is not a dominant big, yet you provide that list of names as examples of players who are. Sorry, but that's absurd.

  8. #58
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    hmmm, u have the Pistons with Thomas but they did have quality bigs in Rodman and Lambeer. Then you go to Magic, but he is 6'10 and won with Abdul Jabbar. I see where you're going with this. I kinda agree
    To do a fair comparison to the Spurs, you would have to agree that Duncan, even at his age, is better than Lambeer. Rodman was averaging about 9 points and 9 rebounds. While those are solid numbers, I don't know that they were earth-shatteringly better than Tiago's and Leonard's. I think the Pistons are a very fair comparison.

    Magic was 6'10, but he played point guard. And the last couple les he won, Kareem was sucking on oxygen tanks while on the bench. No question the best player on that team was Magic, and at that point, Kareem was not the same player.

  9. #59
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    The problem with your logic is that Duncan is still arguably the most dominant big. There is no dominant big. At least not one you would mention in the same sentence as prime Shaq/Duncan... Not even a prime Dirk!
    It looks like the only option is to trade for Lebron... Good luck with that.
    Dominant big, that doesnt mean they have to be in ESPN everyday for you to see them as dominant, theres aspects of the game that are very important, like rebounding and controlling the area around the rim. And no, we dont need LJ to win it all, we need a consistent force, a dominanting force in the paint. When Miami won last year they had Bosh dominating the rebounds, controlling the paint area. And we can go the year before and the year before and so on and on...

  10. #60
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    Reread your first post. You said that 2013 Duncan is not a dominant big, yet you provide that list of names as examples of players who are. Sorry, but that's absurd.
    I did say that Tim wasnt dominant.....like he used to be, thats what I said. Tim cant bang in the paint no more, and that limits him from controlling the paint like he used to. I provide a list of players that are reachable, all this guys are reachable, with the exeption of Lopez. So, you are going to tell me, that if we had Albridge, or Horford, or even Nikola, it wouldnt make us better?

  11. #61
    It is what it is. Mark in Austin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    4,010
    Well, somebody like LaMarcus Albridge... Al Horford ... Brook Lopez...Nikola Vucevic...Jonas Valanciunas. This bigs are very tradeable
    1. Tim Duncan has had a better season this year than everybody on that list. And it's not even close. So as far as a dominant big goes, the Spurs already have the most dominant big.

    2. To trade for any of those inferior assets it would still most likely require giving up Parker, or a combo of Leonard and Splitter + more salary to match in some cases. Without Parker the Spurs go nowhere. And Leonard & Splitter are too high of a price to pay for one big who may or may not work out in the Spurs system.

    3. The combination of Duncan+ Splitter + Leonard has been deadly this year. It would be hard to imagine another lineup with any of the players you listed + Duncan being any better.

    4. Aldridge, Horford and Lopez are not available. There was a bull rumor about Aldridge earleir in the season but he, Lillard and Batum are what Portland are building around. The only way Ferry trades Horford is if he can get Dwight Howard for him. Otherwise he's untouchable. Lopez will only be traded for Howard. Otherwise Brooklyn is keeping him. The basic premise of your original post is wrong because most of these players are not realistic trade targets for the Spurs.
    Last edited by Mark in Austin; 02-25-2013 at 07:28 PM.

  12. #62
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    LaMarcus Albridge... Al Horford ... Brook Lopez...Nikola Vucevic...Jonas Valanciunas. This bigs are very tradeable


    these scrubs are close to max players in todays ty nba

  13. #63
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I did say that Tim wasnt dominant.....like he used to be, thats what I said. Tim cant bang in the paint no more, and that limits him from controlling the paint like he used to. I provide a list of players that are reachable, all this guys are reachable, with the exeption of Lopez. So, you are going to tell me, that if we had Albridge, or Horford, or even Nikola, it wouldnt make us better?
    Now you're changing the subject, and it was your subject.

    The premise of your OP has collapsed.

    Let's move along.

  14. #64
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    Some of you guys keep forgetting that the biggest reason we got the 4 championships is because of a big that could dominate the game, and his name is Tim Duncan, aka Timmy....
    No ??

  15. #65
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    1. Tim Duncan has had a better season this year than everybody on that list. And it's not even close. So as far as a dominant big goes, the Spurs already have the most dominant big.

    2. To trade for any of those inferior assets it would still most likely require giving up Parker, or a combo of Leonard and Splitter + more salary to match in some cases. Without Parker the Spurs go nowhere. And Leonard & Splitter are too high of a price to pay for one big who may or may not work out in the Spurs system.

    3. The combination of Duncan+ Splitter + Leonard has been deadly this year. It would be hard to imagine another lineup with any of the players you listed + Duncan being any better.
    Man, you are funny!!!!!!!
    Duncan is having a better season than all these guys???? WOW!!!
    By having a better season do you mean, in his days off?? while the rest of the team plays??
    Or do you mean his having a better season than Lopez?? LOL
    Or having being more affictive in the paint than Albridge or Holford?? WOW

    And yes, the combination of Duncan+ Splitter + Leonard has been deadly this year. But thats in the regular season, and under Pops coaching, which is the best in the game.

    It took Pop some time to figure Tiago out, but he got it, and his making it work. Tiago would not have the numbers his getting under Pop, if he was under a different system.
    I can only imaging Albridge, Holford, or Nikola under Pop....

    We are not getting no rings, without a dominant big, somebody that can get rebounds, and control the paint. Tim is still great, but he cant bang in the paint no more, and we need that...

  16. #66
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Pau wasn't the leading scorer, but he was pretty clearly the spiritual leader of the 2009 and 2010 Lakers championship team, given Kobe's attempt to chuck away the finals, particularly in 2010.

    Dirk was the leading scorer for the 2011 Mavs, and has a dominant flamingo jumpshot precisely because of his height.

    So, tbh, last year was an anomaly in terms of a championship team lacking the dominant big.
    So you didn't see Lebron operating out of the post in the Finals? I think dominant big can be replaced by good low post scoring and low post defense. You need to be able to get easy baskets while preventing the other team from doing the same thing.

  17. #67
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    Now you're changing the subject, and it was your subject.

    The premise of your OP has collapsed.

    Let's move along.
    Nobody is changing the subject, and you still having answer the first question of this thread. I give you a list of players, that you ask for, so you can answer the question, and you didnt.

  18. #68
    Soft Like Twinkie Filling Juggity's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Post Count
    6,564
    So you didn't see Lebron operating out of the post in the Finals? I think dominant big can be replaced by good low post scoring and low post defense. You need to be able to get easy baskets while preventing the other team from doing the same thing.
    That's my point exactly. A quality big or a player of similar low post scoring ability is necessary to win a championship, simply.

    LeBron was an anomaly in that he can do everything a dominant big can do, even though he is comparatively undersized.

  19. #69
    TD since 97 ezau's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,232
    Isiah Thomas, 89-90 Pistons

  20. #70
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Nobody is changing the subject, and you still having answer the first question of this thread. I give you a list of players, that you ask for, so you can answer the question, and you didnt.
    You gave a list of players that didn't meet the standard you set yourself. You said that the Spurs needed to trade for a dominant big in order to have a chance for another ring. You said that Duncan no longer was such a player. Then you gave a list of non-dominant bigs. So trading for any for them would leave them in the same the predicament you said that they're in right now.

  21. #71
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    1,487
    Dominant big, that doesnt mean they have to be in ESPN everyday for you to see them as dominant, theres aspects of the game that are very important, like rebounding and controlling the area around the rim. And no, we dont need LJ to win it all, we need a consistent force, a dominanting force in the paint. When Miami won last year they had Bosh dominating the rebounds, controlling the paint area. And we can go the year before and the year before and so on and on...
    Do you see the light?
    The big!
    Do you see the light?
    The big!
    Do you see the light?
    What light?
    Have you seen the light?
    Yes! Yes! Tim Big Fundamentals Duncan...I have seen the light!

  22. #72
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    You gave a list of players that didn't meet the standard you set yourself. You said that the Spurs needed to trade for a dominant big in order to have a chance for another ring. You said that Duncan no longer was such a player. Then you gave a list of non-dominant bigs. So trading for any for them would leave them in the same the predicament you said that they're in right now.
    So, then I will agree to disagree, you out look of a dominant big is very high. The list of player that you might have are problably out of reach for anybody to trade for. This list of players are not in that in that level as now, only because they dont play for somebody that can show case their strenghts (aka POP). I believe that Coach Pop can take most players to give their best, and to include their strenghts in the system, therefore taking them to another level of your dominant scale.

  23. #73
    Veteran Poolboy5623's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    1,484
    Not sure if it's been covered in the 3 pages of babble, but didn't the spurs win it in 07 w/tp as the mvp of the finals? Why can't they do it again? What am I missing here?

    & how do they trade, when the deadline is over??

  24. #74
    Believe. Laredoart's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    64
    Not sure if it's been covered in the 3 pages of babble, but didn't the spurs win it in 07 w/tp as the mvp of the finals? Why can't they do it again? What am I missing here?

    & how do they trade, when the deadline is over??
    Youre right about 07, but Tim was the one that got the team to the Finals, not only that, but the east was so weak that one year, that anybody that won the west was winning the whole thing, now, back then TP didnt have a jump shot, he did it with his quickness.
    To answer your question; What am I missing here?? Well, Tim is not the same, our defense is not the same and opponent is problably going to be the Heat, which is a way better team than the 07 Cavs, I believe thats what your missing.
    And yes, the trade line is over, we can all always hope for next year.

  25. #75
    Ridding the world of Alien Scum...Relentlessly. Man In Black's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    4,390
    So, then I will agree to disagree, you out look of a dominant big is very high. The list of player that you might have are problably out of reach for anybody to trade for. This list of players are not in that in that level as now, only because they dont play for somebody that can show case their strenghts (aka POP). I believe that Coach Pop can take most players to give their best, and to include their strenghts in the system, therefore taking them to another level of your dominant scale.
    Jackie Butler, Francisco Elson, and to a lesser extent, Rasho Nesterovic say Hi and we tried to play for Pop but weren't able to use our strengths so we inevitably got traded.
    Horford is undersized. Aldridge is injury prone. Vucevic and Valenciunas are too raw. Lopez would too much. None of the players listed will give the team a better chance to win NOW.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •