This has to be your favorite season right now, old sport lol
Thou or thee?
This has to be your favorite season right now, old sport lol
Lmao. +1. That was good.
Lmao. +1. That was good.
J.A. Adande picked the Clippers to win. Of course he's going to perceive things that support his opinion.
Truer words have never been spoken regarding this series.
If he's like this at 32, what's he gonna be like at 38 - when he gets to Manu and Timmy's age? He better be playing for vet's minimum by then after this grossly overpaid contract. And this poster is in her 50s - doesn't fit any of your categories - but his decline is PLAIN to see.
Spurs have two play makers both have been trash in this series. Mills isn't necessarily a better option even though he has a much better series compared to Parker. Unless Ginobili is playing [well] along side him then it would be Mills with Beli or Green. Green has been very good defensively but he's been the really bad in this series. Beli has been great but offensively but, defensively, there isn't really a place to hide him unless Barnes is playing.
I don't trust that unit to score consistently. Mills is an average, at best, play maker, Beli can create for himself and is a good passer but can't consistently create either. Alot of Duncan and Diaw operating out of the high post looking for someone to get open.
dumbest poster on Spurstalk
Please...In that Lakers series he outscored Manu per par, scored over 20 a game in the Dallas series, and was our second leading scorer in the Heat series (over Manu again, who was 5th for the Spurs). But of course you don't want to look at the whole series, just select games...so here you go (from the same series BTW):
Manu Ginobili
In G5 against LA, Manu scored 8 points (half of Tony's) and had 3 turnovers. So that's supposed to be good or something?
In the 2006 Mavs series, Parker went for 27 in G5 and 24 in G7 to outscore Ginobili in both. So what is it? Individual games you care about or overall series production? I guess whichever matches your agenda.
G6 vs Miami - 9 PTS, 3 AST, 8 TOV for -21 (Manu's worst game of his career was in a Finals closeout game)...not only outplayed by Mario Chalmers...outplayed by literally everyone on the court because he was basically wearing a Miami jersey.
Do you not think we can just as easily pull out terrible Manu games?
Why are you listing career backup point guards?
Playoffs career:
Derek Fisher: 8.3 / 2.3 on 42%
JJ Barea: 8.1 / 3.5 on 44%
Greivis Vasquez: 6.5 / 3.0 on 44%
Leandro Barbosa: 11.4 / 2.3 on 46%
I was responding to the players on Tony's tier (aka starters) who he's knocked out of the playoffs multiple times each:
Playoff career:
Tony Parker: 18.6 / 5.2 on 46%
Jason Kidd: 12.9 / 8.0 on 39%
Steve Nash: 17.3 / 8.8 on 47%
Chris Paul: 20.7 / 9.6 on 48%
Ok so I learned Parker did not dominate bigger PG. Noted. He should take Judo then.
Parker is great, this "defeatist" at ude you talk about is why he's the most likely of the Big 3 to coach. Him and Boris. The first NBA head coaches to also contemporaneously coach Foreign National Teams.
Alot of people are talking about Parker being somehow the least important of the big three despite playing similar minutes and having HOF production. Since no PG played alone 1-5 the whole "carried by teamates" idea is dumb. Duncan and shooters gave Parker space to drobble but they did not give him the speed.
Parker not passing? Who are the elite shooters who play with him who demand the ball? Green who can't dribble, Kawhi who gets scared of new things? Tiago soft hand?
Jeez, dude is not perfect. That's reserved for guys like Jordan and Duncan. Parker is probably on the outside of the top 100 all time but he's probably going to stay highly regarded despite the "advanced data agenda crew". Parker ran some of the all time most dominate offenses in the recent NBA. That's important. The fact that he was too small and weak to be a lock down defender is not important.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)