Reply With Quote
I don't think that's what he's referring to. Unless you think he's referring to an awful congress legacy and then jumps to an awful presidents legacy.
where did you read him say that? i read congress legacy, not political party legacy
I don't think that's what he's referring to. Unless you think he's referring to an awful congress legacy and then jumps to an awful presidents legacy.
Yeah not really sure why he's CROFL.
Man I really miss the congress from 1987....damn they were amazing. What a legacy they built!
I said Republicans. He moved the goalposts to Congress.
I don't expect you to see the difference. You whiffed on the numbers, after all.
Why not? -- they're all Republicans.
Somehow you think he is talking about Obama -- why do you think he wold actively be trashing the administration his wife who is running for President was a big part of?
Explain what you think is his strategy here.
CROFL again.Yeah not really sure why he's CROFL.
Man I really miss the congress from 1987....damn they were amazing. What a legacy they built!
Why did you try to limit my argument to Congress?
I said Republicans.
That is not limited to Congress.
Please explain why you think the term "Republicans" can only include members of Congress and no one else.
This should be good.
already answered post #1
No, it was not.
How do you think that does anything for his wife's chances of being elected?
I never limited your argument. I assumed you were talking about congress much like Spurm was referring to congress in the post following yours. Are you really CROFL at this stuff? Pretty pathetic if true.
What part of post #1 sentence #2 are you having trouble with?
That would be limiting my argument, genius.
I used the word Republicans.
Not Congress.
Not Congressional Republicans.
Republicans.
Do you understand now?
Yes or no.
It does nothing to explain how you think it helps his wife's chances of being elected.
Which is what I asked.
You asked why he would actively trash the current admin, my answer was in the first post. I never said I thought it would help her being elected.
You still pretending you are aren't voting for Hillary?
I said explain what you think his strategy is here. It's OK -- I would never expect you to actually give an explanation.
Never pretended.You still pretending you are aren't voting for Hillary?
You still pretending Clinton was trashing the Obama administration his wife was part of and whose record she is running on?
Angel Urena, Bill Clinton's spokesman, did not directly explain what the former president meant by the "awful legacy of the last eight years," but reiterated that Bill Clinton thinks "President Obama doesn't get the credit he deserves for setting us back on course for economic prosperity."
"When Republicans controlled the White House, their trickle-down approach drove our economy to the brink of a collapse," Urena said. "After President Obama was elected, Republicans made it their number one goal to block him at every turn. That unprecedented obstruction these last eight years is their legacy, and the American people should reject it by electing Hillary Clinton to build on President Obama's success so we can all grow and succeed together."
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/21/politi...acy/index.html
Jesus christ is there a bigger got than Chump on the internet?
I saw a video where Bill Clinton slams two concurrent presidential administrations, including the most recent one, apparently. If he is not referring to the Obama administration, he is confused (kind of Homer's dad like), and ought not be campaigning. Otherwise, he is disparaging the legacy of the Obama administration. If not by name, by temporal association.
Be sure to reference this chart whenever Chump is intentionally obfuscating whatever it is you're discussing with him. He seems stubbornly determined to argue in bad faith.
Speech of 21 March. Obviously he's ting on Obama's years, and the Repug Reign of Error.
And Hillary is The One Agent of Change who's going to CHANGE it all for the better?
Hillary and Bernie won't be able to do in Congress under control of the (House) Repugs, but Hillary, like Bill, will sign a bunch of Repug that screws Americans.
A really horrible speech, with the economy and jobs much improved in the last 7 years (but still not improved enough or fast enough due to Repug austerity at all levels)
WTF the Bill?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-22-2016 at 09:54 AM.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/21/politi...-obama-legacy/
This got had a senior moment. They're walking that comment back now.
Obama is without question, one of the worst presidents of all time.
And he was preceded by arguably the worst president of all time in George W Bush.
The reality is we've had 16 years of lousy presidents, and Clinton wasn't bad by comparison to these two guys (Bill, I think Hillary is awful)
Whatever happened to men like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson? Or enlightened thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and James Madison. The Fathers of the Revolution are some of the greatest men not just in the history of the United States, but the history of the world.... and yet these days we get Hussein Obama as president.
This country has all the resources and science and technology to be the greatest country in the world in every aspect (quality of life, freedom, access to necessities, low poverty, college education, everythinj)... it NEEDS to get back to that... I think it may eventually if the right president comes along, but choosing between Clinton and Trump seems awful.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
