Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 67 of 67
  1. #51
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Isn't baseball and cricket a significantly older sports than soccer? Or Batting games in general.

    I was watching a do entary about some "developing" soccer nations a few years ago and Soccer wasn't even a popular sport in Asia. Both Western and Eastern...like 50-60 years ago.

    What's interesting is Colonial and imperialistic nations like Britain and the US dictated the spread of their sports in Asia...

    I'm not sure how soccer started in South America.
    Yes they are.

    Soccer spread in South America through British immigrant workers there. Brits pretty much spread all the big sports except basketball. Even baseball is a British game (no Splits, it's not a descendant of cricket). And American football is obviously a child of rugby.

  2. #52
    Winner in a losers circle 140's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,846
    american cricket

  3. #53
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    26,183
    No. It was a counter to the re ed assumption ITT that the MLB is desperate for viewers (and thus revenue).

    And how impassioned you are defending TicTacTrot. Europhilic to the core
    You're right, MLB is trending UP!



    two-thirds viewership decline from 30 years ago, just in net viewers
    there were 80 million less 'Muricans in 1984



    only old s watch fatbol, probably because they have something in common (fat)

    Meanwhile...




  4. #54
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    You're right, MLB is trending UP!



    two-thirds viewership decline from 30 years ago, just in net viewers
    there were 80 million less 'Muricans in 1984



    only old s watch fatbol, probably because they have something in common (fat)

    Meanwhile...



    Yep. Trending up.

    Between FOX, FOX Deportes and FOX Sports GO, World Series Game 7 delivered a combined average of 40.9 million viewers. FOX Sports estimates that more than 75 million viewers tuned in to see all-or-part of the Cubs’ dramatic Game 7 victory on Wednesday night.
    "But Cubs ."

    Cavs vs. Warriors game 7 was backed by an even more famous American sports angle (Cleveland Curse), featured the two biggest stars in basketball, a 73 win team, and it still lost the ratings battle.

    Also median age is a poor indicator of anything. Tastes change throughout life. You yourself went from liking baseball to "being enlightened" by a game that ends in a tie 30% of the time. Also, referencing national ratings is silly because baseball is driven by its regional presence, and it's "trending up" there:



    Wednesday was a playoff bevy for sports fans with playoffs in both the NBA and NHL, and a great baseball game nationally, but in 14 of 24 markets, it was not hockey or basketball or even that Mets-Cubs that people were watching, but Major League Baseball on their local regional sports networks.

    In a sign that baseball continues to be a regional phenomenon, from Cincinnati to Seattle, Boston to Tampa Bay, Baltimore to St. Louis, and more, it was regular season baseball games that crushed all comers in their respective markets over the NBA and NHL playoffs, as well as the nationally televised MLB game on ESPN.
    And:


  5. #55
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    And "median age."

    I guess the NFL is going to die 6 years after the MLB.


  6. #56
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    26,183
    Cherry picking data again. What you're doing is looking at this chart as if it was 2001, 2004, or 2009 and saying "beisbol is back baby!" when the trend is so clear a kindergartner could understand.



    Do you know what the word "trend" means?

  7. #57
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Cherry picking data again. What you're doing is looking at this chart as if it was 2001, 2004, or 2009 and saying "beisbol is back baby!" when the trend is so clear a kindergartner could understand.



    Do you know what the word "trend" means?
    You're the one cherry picking. Since when are Finals matches (in any sport) indicative of the health of the sport or league? If the Spurs don't make the NBA finals, I won't be watching them. You also neglect to mention that World Series games often go to head-to-head against NFL games.

    There is no "trend." You're getting your data from national TV broadcasts. No one is going to watch the Mets vs. Dodgers on ESPN over their own team on an RSN.

    Trending up:


  8. #58
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    26,183
    lol attendance per game through 2002

  9. #59
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Do you know what the word "trend" means?
    Again, what does a median age increase prove?

    Do you or don't understand that tastes change? You've experienced it yourself being "enlightened" by a twink filled jogging game that ends in a tie 30% of the time.

    You're also referencing only one data point. National TV ratings. Big ing deal. NFL's median age viewership is rising there, too. I guess the future trend for the NFL is to "die" a few years after the MLB.

    Trying so hard to "prove" baseball is dying out of shallow Europhilia
    Last edited by midnightpulp; 04-06-2017 at 01:59 PM.

  10. #60
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    lol attendance per game through 2002
    The hashes are 5 year segments.

    Trying so hard can't even read graphs properly.

  11. #61
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    26,183
    The hashes are 5 year segments.

    Trying so hard can't even read graphs properly.
    Ok.

    lol attendance per game

  12. #62
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Ok.

    lol attendance per game
    Attendance pulls in 3 billion in revenue for the MLB. Lol indeed.

  13. #63
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    74,105
    Attendance pulls in 3 billion in revenue for the MLB. Lol indeed.
    Just because people attend it doesnt make it a sport.

    Millions upon millions attend church on Sundays. Dont mean the priests or altar boys should be called professional athletes

  14. #64
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    74,105
    And before you say but theres a ball involved, watch thiss asshole


  15. #65
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Post Count
    9,767
    that only lasted one season.

    amazon outbid twitter for next season.

  16. #66
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Post Count
    54,257
    Now I guess the new shtick is criticizing the MLB for making smart business deals
    Tbh, the type of people who like Skinnyfatball are the same type of people who thought Bernie Sanders would be a good president. They wouldn't know anything about smart business deals

  17. #67
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Post Count
    54,257
    Just because people attend it doesnt make it a sport.
    Could be worse: nobody attends floptrot games and it's not a sport.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •