Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 69 of 69
  1. #51
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    Spurs are going to ride with Lauvergne. If there is one thing consistent about the Spurs, it's that they let their big men suck for two or three seasons before they decide they cannot play in this system. He'll eat up minutes and produce nothing. I'd be shocked if he isn't on the roster for this year and next.

  2. #52
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Oh no, I'd want nothing to do with him for that price. The Spurs already had their stint with Thomas, and there's no reason why NY couldn't take Paul and waive him themselves to save SA much-needed money. I know you desperately want to trade Patty, but that desire does nothing but infects what should be a small move.
    Many teams should be interested in Willy. If that's the case, the price would be more than Paul imo.

  3. #53
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Many teams should be interested in Willy. If that's the case, the price would be more than Paul imo.
    I don't think they'll be all too many teams looking to pay more than token seconds for Hernangomez. He's a good prospect, but he apparently can't get minutes behind mediocre bigs, and the market for centers has been bad for years now. I think Joff and a legit first would be a better offer than most will give even though almost every team could give more.

  4. #54
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I don't think they'll be all too many teams looking to pay more than token seconds for Hernangomez. He's a good prospect, but he apparently can't get minutes behind mediocre bigs, and the market for centers has been bad for years now. I think Joff and a legit first would be a better offer than most will give even though almost every team could give more.
    For Willy, I would avoid a 1st with this draft class coming up.

  5. #55
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    For Willy, I would avoid a 1st with this draft class coming up.
    Doesn't have to be a 2018 first.

  6. #56
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Festus Ezeli, Jordan Hill, Shawn Long, Christian Wood, and Terrence Jones are all better than this TOSB.

  7. #57
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Festus Ezeli, Jordan Hill, Shawn Long, Christian Wood, and Terrence Jones are all better than this TOSB.
    Can't disagree. Bogut is done.

  8. #58
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Spurs fans wanting Bogut remind me of the fans that wanted Damon Stoudamire in 2008 and Kevin Martin in 2016. Both were on fumes and done.

    Bogut falls in the same circle to me. I've watched probably more Lakers basketball than I should this year tbh..

  9. #59
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    The gap isn't as wide as you're implying imo.

    Bogut is pretty bad too.


    It is. Bogut is still a significantly better rim protector, rebounder, passer and screener. Sure, Lauvergne is more mobile, but it's not like he's some amazing p-n-r defender.

    What's with the Hernangomez interest; aren't you anti old school bigs?



    While Bogut is likely just about better than Lauvergne right now, I don't see the Spurs paying so much to cut Lauvergne just so they could slightly improve their 3rd center position. $3M for a team that's losing money probably is significant. Besides, after the trade deadline there'll be better options at center if they've really really soured on Lauvergne.
    They probably won't do it, but they should. If they're serious about attempting to contend, they need better insurance at center.

    If not traded first, the only clear cut better option guaranteed to be bought out, is Monroe. He'll likely want more of a guaranteed role though.


    I don't think they'll be all too many teams looking to pay more than token seconds for Hernangomez. He's a good prospect, but he apparently can't get minutes behind mediocre bigs, and the market for centers has been bad for years now. I think Joff and a legit first would be a better offer than most will give even though almost every team could give more.
    Agree on the likelihood of relatively poor offers. That's why most of these types of centers don't get moved. Despite their glaring limitations, its not that they suck; it's that their limitations and contract, in most cases, make it so the offers are so bad that there's no incentive, outside of finances.

    Him being out of the rotation has virtually nothing to do with him. If they didn't acquire Kanter, a better version, he'd more than likely have his role. Meanwhile, O'Quinn offers something different and is a quality backup.

  10. #60
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    [LEFT]

    It is. Bogut is still a significantly better rim protector, rebounder, passer and screener. Sure, Lauvergne is more mobile, but it's not like he's some amazing p-n-r defender.

    What's with the Hernangomez interest; aren't you anti old school bigs?
    Bogut isn't close to what he was 2 years ago. He's a s of himself. He's like Stoudamire in 08' or Martin in 16'. Done.

    The name carries a lot of weight though for the fans who haven't watched him play lately.

    That's my two cents on him.

    So I agree to disagree.

    Hernangomez interest is there because of how his stock is very low right now. I like his grit, intelligence, motor and IQ -- he's a more athletic Oberto (I'm not saying he's a great athlete but better athlete than Oberto). I think he could be a solid back up 5 off the bench in the future if he continues to work.

  11. #61
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Here's another:

    Bolomboy just got waived so the Bucks can sign Kilpatrick for the year.

    I'd prefer Bolomboy over Bogut.

  12. #62
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    well what this thread has taught me is that there are options out there...
    Problem is like Chinook, BG and others pointed also in this thread, Pop isn't waiving a guy that is basically guaranteed $3 million in 2 seasons. Unless it was some kind of a trade, they will still keep Joff.

  13. #63
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    Bogut isn't close to what he was 2 years ago. He's a s of himself. He's like Stoudamire in 08' or Martin in 16'. Done.

    The name carries a lot of weight though for the fans who haven't watched him play lately.

    That's my two cents on him.

    So I agree to disagree.

    Hernangomez interest is there because of how his stock is very low right now. I like his grit, intelligence, motor and IQ -- he's a more athletic Oberto (I'm not saying he's a great athlete but better athlete than Oberto). I think he could be a solid back up 5 off the bench in the future if he continues to work.
    Again, not debating that, but the question isn't whether he's still good (or for those who keep mentioning it, whether the finances likely prevent it), it's whether he's still better than Lauvergne and the answer is unequivocally yes. Even though I disagree, I get the concern with Pop overplaying him though.

    Relative to what it would have been before the season, I don't think Hernangomez' stock has changed. Think teams know he's out of the rotation for reasons I stated.

    If Raptors don't plan on salary dumping Valanciunas in the off season (Nets?), Nogueira is the guy. They're close to the tax and overloaded with rotation centers. Elite shot blocker/lob threat and a good passer, particularly on the roll. Forbes, Lauvergne, 2nd is worth a shot.

  14. #64
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Again, not debating that, but the question isn't whether he's still good (or for those who keep mentioning it, whether the finances likely prevent it), it's whether he's still better than Lauvergne and the answer is unequivocally yes. Even though I disagree, I get the concern with Pop overplaying him though.

    Relative to what it would have been before the season, I don't think Hernangomez' stock has changed. Think teams know he's out of the rotation for reasons I stated.

    If Raptors don't plan on salary dumping Valanciunas in the off season (Nets?), Nogueira is the guy. They're close to the tax and overloaded with rotation centers. Elite shot blocker/lob threat and a good passer, particularly on the roll. Forbes, Lauvergne, 2nd is worth a shot.
    Nogueira I like a lot. I can agree there.

  15. #65
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    You haven't watched him play this year.
    You're right. I haven't. You said he's a s of what he used to be. I know he's old and his best years are way behind him.
    Like I said, he'd fit right in with Parker/Pau. Even more so if the Spurs could then sign him to an expensive long term contract.

  16. #66
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    For those who didn't watch him play this year.

    There's a reason he hasn't been picked up yet.

    I don't blame any team for not wanting him.

  17. #67
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    For those who didn't watch him play this year.

    There's a reason he hasn't been picked up yet.

    I don't blame any team for not wanting him.

    That reason could very well be he's yet to decide on and/or waiting on a team. Bucks are rumored interested. They might be working the trade market first before doubling back.


  18. #68
    The OL' Perfessor wildbill2u's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    8,641
    Spurs won't give Joff away on waivers if they still have to pay him. They simply don't do that sort of thing. If its a bad deal, they'll leave him on the bench until a better deal comes along

  19. #69
    Veteran 8FOR!3's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    4,211
    Spurs won't give Joff away on waivers if they still have to pay him. They simply don't do that sort of thing. If its a bad deal, they'll leave him on the bench until a better deal comes along
    With Rudy Gay as the backup stretch 4/big 3 role and Bertans taking over as the other big I don't really see the need for another one when you've got Ginobili and Patty as well off the bench. That's a 9 man rotation not including Forbes/Kyle (who is also a SF/stretch PF)/Murray. If Bertans works out I think he's the missing piece we need off the bench bringing size and more shooting.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •