Russian Interference Poll & Discussion

[Spurtacular]

The stolen emails weren't stolen from her server.

Have another great Friday night crying out for men, derp!

So, no Russian hacking after all?

I wish you'd make up your mind.

[Isitjustme?]

If you choose huge or moderate (esp. huge), I'd like to hear the logic behind it.

I personally think anyone paying attention to the hacked DNC emails / fake news stories from Russian troll farms was already a Trump supporter or someone who was looking for any reason out there to vote for Trump over Hillary which is why there was almost no impact.

The lifelong Democrat in Youngstown Ohio who voted for Trump did it because he believed in Trump's view on trade, not because of emailgate or pizzagate.

Her emails were a huge story not just on Fox but on NYT and elsewhere and make her look untrustworthy. Story would not have lingered forever if they were not hacked and released

[Winehole23]

Was it not in the public interest that the information be released?

As far as I know the authenticity of the emails was not challenged.

[Winehole23]

Didn't Dem voters deserve to know, at a minimum, that the DNC had its thumb on the scale in the primary?

[Pavlov]

I asked how anything was conflated.

The stolen emails weren't stolen from her server.

So, no Russian hacking after all?

1) derp demands to know how the email issues were conflated.

2) derp gets a simple, easily understood explanation.

3) derp IMMEDIATELY conflates the separate email issues again.

I couldn't find a better example of the kind of low information rube voter I was talking about if I tried.

Thanks, derp!

[Will Hunting]

Didn't Dem voters deserve to know, at a minimum, that the DNC had its thumb on the scale in the primary?

No and you it was Hillary’s time the Bernie supporters needed to just shut up and pledge their full loyalty to Hillary

[rmt]

People in the middle (the only ones who matter) in PA, WI and MI voted their pocketbook/job - Trump's message to them was more convincing than Hillary's (who didn't even bother to go to WI).

[Spurtacular]

1) derp demands to know how the email issues were conflated.

2) derp gets a simple, easily understood explanation.

3) derp IMMEDIATELY conflates the separate email issues again.

I couldn't find a better example of the kind of low information rube voter I was talking about if I tried.

Thanks, derp!

cos connect the dots is an explanation
I'm keepin' it as vague as possible

Psycohpav Chump doesn't want to make a real case

[Pavlov]

cos connect the dots is an explanation
I'm keepin' it as vague as possible

Psycohpav Chump doesn't want to make a real case

No, I told you exactly how they were conflated and you conflated them exactly the same way after I told you.

The fact you still don't understand proves me doubly right.

Thanks again for all your help making my case for me, rube!

[Spurtacular]

No, I told you exactly how they were conflated and you conflated them exactly the same way after I told you.

The fact you still don't understand proves me doubly right.

Thanks again for all your help making my case for me, rube!

If you don't want to spell out your case, then that says how unimportant it is.

[Pavlov]

If you don't want to spell out your case, then that says how unimportant it is.

you still can't understand simple sentences.

Thanks for admitting it. That's an important first step.

[Spurtacular]

you still can't understand simple sentences.

Thanks for admitting it. That's an important first step.

Muh tiny W