They are dead because they attacked someone with a gun.
Where did I bet on that? I didn’t make this thread.
They are dead because they attacked someone with a gun.
If it was pure self defense how did Rosenbaum get shot in the back? I haven't seen video of him and all i've heard is that he went for rittenhouse's gun
Trying to take a gun away from a mass shooter = deserves to get shot by said mass shooter
This is when you thought it was a Trump shooter and far left rioter victim.
Nothing in that post said anything about who the victim was.
Try again incel.
so if there's an active shooter at a school and someone attacks said active shooter, then they shouldn't be responsible for killing said heroes because they were attacking someone with a gun? Because it sounds like that is what you're saying.
He shot one person in self defense. Then they tried to knock him out and possibly kill him.
That's not a comparable situation.
It was implied. Your poll is about "right wing heroes" so the victim would not be a Trump supporter.
How so? An active shooter is surrounded by enemies and has a reasonable fear of getting killed by anyone making a move towards him. How is that different than this. Someone might try to knock out or even kill the active shooter
That’s an unfounded logical leap. Trump supporters like gun violence no matter what, anyone shooting into random crowds is a hero to them regardless of the victim.
If you haven't seen the shooting video here it is.
The far right celebrated the deaths of three people, so why wouldn't the far left do the same with the shoe on the other foot.
Graphic my ass that video don't show
Also the thing about that video is that there are two shots,but the report says one GSW. So either the victim had a gun so and he missed so he's a ty shot, the perp had missed one at close range so he's a ty shot, or the perp hit the same spot twice so he's an amazing shot.
There's smoke but I can't definitively say if they both come from the shooter or one from each. We just have to wait and see.
FINGERS CROSSED
So then, crimes against property warrant an extrajudicial shooting by anyone, but if someone gets murdered, no harm must be allowed to befall property?
What is this all about?
Much as I would like to say a young black teen was shot by a Trump supporter, there's no evidence that this shooting is protest related or politically motivated yet, so we shouldn't assume it is.
This is the first time I have seen this story tbh
Looks like self defense to me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)