Dude you are really irritating to listen to. Just take it for it's worth instead of getting all pissed off about it.
It's not your screen name. I can change your screen name right now and your posts will still be horrible.
Dude you are really irritating to listen to. Just take it for it's worth instead of getting all pissed off about it.
Really?
What's so horrible about my posts. I think I have some decent sports knowledge, and I try to keep my random thoughts to the "club" section. What exactly is so horrible? The fact I kid from time to tim about e-sex? The fact I'm a ' ing arab'?
I honestly don't see it. I've tried to go out of my way to contribute something, but it seems I'm just annoying. Sorry, I'm not Mouse. I don't get hard off people hating me.
Listening to you being a hypocrite is more annoying.
You get really defensive, you start too many threads, and of course your screen name. A good advice is try to fit in here first. You are not funny like Mouse either.
You know what? I really miss cowboy_me_kr.
How many threads have I started today?
If you find Mouse funny, than I guess there's no point in me replying to your posts anymore.
...the ?
Thanks for sharing.
Okay, get off the subject of yourself.
I still don't understand the point of saying we should concentrate on the Pistons not the Mavs. Isn't all the Spurs can do is just win as many games as they can? Are you upset that posters are concerned about the Mavs? It's logical to be concerned about both teams, right? They have to beat the Mavs before they even get to the Pistons.
There are alot of similarities between the late 80's Pissons and the current ones, not to mention the fact that a member of those 80's teams tried to assemble the current one in the image of his former team.
Do you like getting slapped around? Or do you think you actually prove points here?
Actually, I respect you.
It's "logical" to be concerned about the biggest threat.
I'm not into talking about myself, but when people keep taking shots for no reason...I don't think it's too much to ask for an explanation. In the 7 days since I've joined, I've made 18 threads. That's a little over 2 a day. That's too much? I've maded topics on Sports, College, along with some random ones (in the 'club' section where by description they belong). What's so "annoying" about that? K, I'm done now.
Btw, it really bothers me you guys accept calling people " " and " ing arab".
But when it comes to a borderline thread, you're quick to lock it.
I don't accept it. The guy has been warned. We take care of these things outside the forum.
Thank you. (not sarcasm)
Respect, like...R. Kelly respects the girl he just peed on?
I have nothing against you being here but not crediting the mavs as a threat to the spurs sounds like hate comments to me since they have been playing much better than the pistons lately and the pistons have been healthy all year. To me the spurs are better than the pistons and the mavs but the mavs are just as capable of knocking them off as the pistons.
You're right.
Capability Meter
0---------------------------------------100
---- ^
Pistins won a ring.
Pistons took us to a game 7 in the finals.
Pistons have a storied tradition of excellence.
What do the Mavs have?
Mavs have the same team as last year (except diop, minus finley).
Mavs have a coach with limited experiene.
Mavs have a team LEARNING to play defense.
Mahvs have a team that has never won anything.
I don't think I'm being a homer. I'm just stating common knowledge.
I'm not saying the Mavs aren't a thread, I'm saying the Spurs would beat them in a 7-game series. Don't confuse the two. It would be 4-2 or something compe ive. But I don't see the Mavs beating the spurs 4 times.
You guys sound like there will be a cake walk for the pistons in the EC. A healthy Indiana will be a great charllenge. And PHX without Amare is not much more dangerous than the healthy MIA.
Both the spurs and pistons fans shouldn't get too overconfident.
Well I disagree with your logic as if the series was already decided. The mavs when on their game can beat anybody. They blew out both the pistons and spurs this year. With Harris and Howard healthy they can beat the spurs if they play their game that they are capable of. I think especially Harris will be a tough cover for San Antonio and Ginobili had problems with Howard before as well.
"When on there game" anybody can beat anybody.
That's why the playoffs are a 'series'. Not one game. The Hawks beat the spurs. Doesn't men they will beat us in a 7 game series.
Not confidence.
Just saying 'if things go as planned'. Nothing wrong with that.
The mavs can get on a hot streak. Not always the best team wins in the playoffs. It was proven when the 8th seed nuggets beat the 1 seed Sonics. Also the spurs and mavs have identical records so there is no proof this year that the spurs are clearly better than the mavs. There are only 2 teams that can upset the spurs and Miami and Phoenix as a long shot.
there you go again ...With Harris and Howard healthy they can beat the spurs if they play their game that they are capable of. I think especially Harris will be a tough cover for San Antonio and Ginobili had problems with Howard before as well.
So you've gone from saying they Mavs have a decent shot of beating the spurs, to comparing them to the Nuggests? You know why the Nuggets winning as a 8 seed was such a big deal? Because it hardly ever happens. Ever.
Phoenix is not beating the Spurs. I'll be my penis on that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)