Reply With Quote
then why don't u bold every Spur game since it's possible we'll lose to any
I have Denver on there. Sacto is fading lately(lost 3 of last 4, incl to Minn, who have no chance to beat SA, according to some people) and Utah is playing out the season...they are dead.
then why don't u bold every Spur game since it's possible we'll lose to any
I would bet money that they do not lose to any of the ones not in bold.then why don't u bold every Spur game since it's possible we'll lose to any
exactly, I would bet money we don't lose to Wolves.
I would have bet my house that we would not have lost to Atlanta....one never knows....
You are missing my point.
These are possible losses, I am not saying that they will lose.
Worst case is the Spurs lose 5 games.
For Dallas, 4 games.
But if SA beats Dallas in that game, then SA wraps up the HCA.
I partly agree. But I would say Dallas has more chance of losing more ground than gaining on Spurs. especially cause of their injuries.
Careful Jim, you're contradicting yourself.
like that is something out of the ordinary????
like that is something out of the ordinary????
WTF are you talking about, they are like 1 or 2 games out of the playoffs.Utah is playing out the season...they are dead.
Utah can still make it, and I wouldn't put it past them to make a run and pass Sacramento.
That's exactly what I said last season. It's pretty universal - you win the road game early to establish the first elimination game is at home. No team has ever swept games 6 and 7 on the road in the Finals. That's why this Pistons fan was more depressed over the loss in game five than in game seven last season.
I'd like to point out something. Homecourt or not, the Pistons are 12-2 in the middle three games of a 2-3-2 format. They were the first team in NBA history to sweep the middle three games when they won in Portland in 1990, and were the first team to sweep the middle three games at home when they won the le in 2004.
The only other teams to sweep games 3-5 in the Finals are Chicago in 1991, and the 2001 Lakers.
The only losses were against the Lakers in 1988 - and here's the hope for Spurs fans - off of Robert Horry's overtime game-winner in 2005.
The only two losses for the Pistons ever at the Palace in the Finals came in game two vs. the Blazers in 1990, and game five vs. the Spurs in 2005. Both losses came in overtime.
BUT...
The Pistons have to get thier first.
I will bet you a bottle of wine that Utah is dead meat, and has no shot at the playoffs.
Deal??
Deal.
I'll take that bet.
Ill even throw in a dozen Pro VIs too.
Deal.
I say no Utah in playoffs, you say yes they make it. 1 bottle of wine.
I will wager Mesina Hof bottle, since it is from here, and you can wager Texas Hills or Llano or some winery around SA, ok?
No Pro V1s though, those balls are $50/dozen.
Brian and Tyson are up for a three some so we need 1 more
Calling Mr.Shoogar, calling Mr Shoogar.
wtf
pussyNo Pro V1s though, those balls are $50/dozen
What the was that?Calling Mr.Shoogar, calling Mr Shoogar.
Yes I am....I only buy those balls when I have credit in my pro shop from tourney wins.wtf
pussy
Last edited by Jimcs50; 03-29-2006 at 05:48 PM.
fall creek winery is better than llano imo.
Yes, I agree.
my only problem with them is that i have had a few corked bottles of their granite reserve - i returned them to the store for another with no problem, but nothing is nastier than corked wine =[
If Dallas had of beaten Detroit yesterday, the Spurs would have been in a better position now because Dallas just lost to Cleveland.
Shoogar, per usual, was on the money.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions