Reply With Quote
You complain about SAC getting more FTA's. I tell you it is because they drove to the hoop more. You don't acknowledge that and come back with this ? Next.
Because I want to win every playoff game against obviously inferior compe ion. I hate losing to a crap team like ___ramento.
You complain about SAC getting more FTA's. I tell you it is because they drove to the hoop more. You don't acknowledge that and come back with this ? Next.
Tim Duncan operates in the paint. Manu Ginobili operates in the paint. ing Bibby is the jumpshooting queen of all time and he has more FTA than Duncan does in the series. That's ed up.
Duncan hasn't been operating like he normally does. Ginobli is a flopper. Stop ing. You are up 2-1 in the series.
Oh please. Manu and Parker both travel their fair share and are never whistled.
On the kings forums they were
but seriously im tired of the complaining about losing, just STFU and get over it
I know. I've been avoiding a certain board as of late.
Duncan operated pretty normally in game 3. Bibby still got more FTAs.
Smells like a fish market.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe Duncan wasn't fouled?
Anyways, I will not have access to a computer on Sunday or Monday, got a college golf match to play in. Don't want people to think I disappeared if the Kings lose game 4.
Name a time they called interference on a player touching the net on a play that meant something in a playoff game.
Did it occur to you that maybe he was being fouled?
Flash....half the league travels and has for decades. ....even Jordan traveled. Its rarely called especially on stars and even less in the playoffs. The refs cannot call every single infraction that happens in an NBA game...they would go on for 4 hours.
Ok, all of you basically say that I should get over it, blah blah blah. Let me ask you this, flash back to game five Western Conference second round, Spurs vs. Lakers, 2004. NO ONE and I mean NO ONE in this forum said "get over it". Actually, if I remember correctly, Pop even pen ioned the call for some BS reason. Granted, the series was tied 2-2 and the teams were much more even than SA and SAC today, but still, no coach, or fan for that matter should ever back down from such an obvious error. Will ing Stern do something about this? NO. But at least the refs will publicly be humiliated. By the way, if you touch the net its goaltending, anyone can argue that it altered the shot, and yes, its in the rulebook, I checked.
Believe me, if Sacto wins the series (odds of about 1 to 1 million), all of you "get over it" people are gonna be crying your ing pussies off about that noncall.
Here's the entire entry on goaltending. If you can find the word "NET" in there, let alone anything that applies you win the -flavored cookie.
If there is any ing, it shouldn't be that Bibby tugged on the net, it should be that he smacked the out of Manu on his way to the basket.
Whatever. It still took a lucky ass bounce, and a lucky ass shot over Tim "6 Blocks" Duncan.
This series was over when Duncan decided the Spurs were his team again.
Actually you piece of , you happened to accidentally miss one...... How sad.. See rule No. i
RULE NO. 11
BASKET INTERFERENCE—
GOALTENDING
Section I—A Player Shall Not:
a. Touch the ball or the basket ring
when the ball is using the basket ring as
its lower base or hang on the rim while
the ball is passing through.
EXCEPTION: If a player near his own
basket has his hand legally in contact
with the ball, it is not a violation if his
contact with the ball continues after the
ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such
action, he touches the basket.
b. Touch the ball when it is above the
basket ring and within the imaginary
cylinder.
c. During a field goal attempt, touch a
ball after it has touched any part of the
backboard above ring level, whether the
ball is considered on its upward or
downward flight.
d. During a field goal attempt, touch a
ball after it has touched the backboard
below the ring level and while the ball is
on its upward flight.
e. Trap the ball against the face of the
backboard after it has been released.
(To be a trapped ball, three elements
must exist simultaneously.The hand, the
ball and the backboard must all occur at
the same time.A batted ball against the
backboard is not a trapped ball.)
f. Touch any live ball from within the
playing area that is on its downward
flight with an opportunity to score.This
is considered to be a “field goal
attempt” or trying for a goal.
g. Touch the ball at any time with a
hand which is through the basket ring.
h.Vibrate the rim, net or backboard so
as to cause the ball to make an
unnatural bounce.
i. Touch the rim, net or ball while the
ball is in the net preventing it from
clearing the basket.
PENALTY: If the violation is at the
opponent’s basket, the offended team is
awarded two points, if the attempt is
from the two point zone and three
points if it is from the three point zone.
The crediting of the score and subsequent
procedure is the same as if the
awarded score has resulted from the
ball having gone through the basket,
except that the official shall hand the
ball to a player of the team en led to
the throw-in. If the violation is at a
team’s own basket, no points can be
scored and the ball is awarded to the
offended team at the free throw line
105
extended on either sideline. If there is a
violation by both teams, play shall be
resumed by a jump ball between any
two opponents at the center circle.
toward the hoop for the official to
discontinue his three second count. If he
attempts to back the defensive player
down, attempting to secure a better
position in relation to the basket,
119
offensive three seconds or an offensive
foul must be called. If he passes off and
immediately makes a move out of the
lane, there should be no whistle.
Neither # of fouls nor # of FT's tells the story as far as the officials favoring either team (or appearing to favor either team). But # of FT's is MUCH more relevant than # of FT's. There's too many variables involved in getting from # of fouls to # of FT's...
What if one team is driving to the basket more?
What if one team is smarter about spreading their fouls out over 4 quarters and staying out of the bonus as much as possible?
What if one team is ahead at the end and gets multiple FT attempts during the last minute of the game?
Example (exaggerated)
Team A commits 16 fouls, all non-shooting fouls, 4 per quarter. Team B gets ZERO FT's.
Team B commits 10 fouls, all shooting fouls. Team A gets 20 FT's.
Looking at the box score YOU would think that Team B got jobbed by the officials, right??
Game 4:
Kings - called for 25 PF's
Spurs - called for 21 PF's
Both got 27 FT's, but the Spurs made 3 less.
Surely Spurs fans won't whine about officiating in this game too???
Good luck against ___ramento in Game 5!!
Sincerely,
"dumbass"
Last edited by LEONARD; 05-01-2006 at 08:43 AM.
I'm back. And my team won the Southern California Regionals.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
