You actually thought he was a decent ref?I'm seriously dissapointed by Salvatore
The dude is notorious for being horrible.
or as my dad calls him Salv a torrie
I watched the replay and it was 103% ovbious that Bibby touched the net before the ball went in. Can't the Spurs appeal the call because don't the refs have to look at the replay if its a buzzer beater. If they would have looked at it, there's no doubt they would have called off the basket. I'm seriously dissapointed by Salvatore.....
You actually thought he was a decent ref?I'm seriously dissapointed by Salvatore
The dude is notorious for being horrible.
or as my dad calls him Salv a torrie
The Spurs should not have let it get to that point though. The Kings played their asses off and got the win and deserve the props for that. Now lets go get Game 4.
GET OVER IT.
I try not to pin the blame on the officals, but last night
he was atrocious.
Perhaps it was a "gift"?
Yeah just let it go bro.
Im sure game 3 will be fresh in the spurs mind on sunday.
Moving on...
Thats not offensive goaltending. Why do Spurs fans feel a need to reach for such BS when its obvious that the Spurs just didn't deserve to win last night?
Touching the net when the ball is on the cylindar is offensive goltending.
Some fans just look for excuses. The good ones don't.Thats not offensive goaltending. Why do Spurs fans feel a need to reach for such BS when its obvious that the Spurs just didn't deserve to win last night?
Ehh I don't think he's making an excuse Mikey, I think he was just pointing it out and making another of the What If statements that have flooded us since the loss. No worries though Game 4 will be here soon enough.
Manny was the one implying the excuses being made. I was just saying that not all of us do.
I also didn't mean you personally GoSpurs.
Its all good Mandy. I think we were all disappointed by the result. Its the playoffs so heartbreaks are part of it.
Manny was like "He barely touched it!!!" last night, acknowledging that he DID in fact touch the net. They're not going to call that, violation or not.
Its not a violation to touch the net. If you pull on the net to where the rim moves, THEN it is a violation. But touching the net isn't illegal.
The Spurs didn't deserve to win? Is that why the final score was so close? It could have been anyone's game.
Look, I'm not giving an excuse for the play, nor am I stating all the obvious errors that the refs had. All I'm really interested to know how much money the Maloof Brothers paid the refs, because although ALL THREE refs were supposed to look at the shot and no one saw (or no one chose to see) the goaltend, they had (by NBA rules) to watch the replay. ing assholes they still didnt call it!!.
Did the Spurs deserve to win? NO
Should they have won? Yes
Dude, this is pathetic. Bibby touched the net? Would it have mattered? The Spurs made a huge mental mistake at the end of the game, and the Kings played a great possession. The Kings deserved to win, the Spurs deserved to lose.
Bring on game 4.
Game 2: Duncan's screen was illegal, blah, blah, blah
Game 3: Bibby touched net, it was interference, blah, blah, blah
Either or both of these statements might be true, but fans need to get over the calls and non-calls. Somethings are subjective, somethings are just missed. That's just basketball.
Once again, touching the net is not goaltending.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)