Reply With Quote
Arf, arf.
Actually, that is my 2 year old Dauchshund, pretzel. And, just for your information, I am convinced that he could best you in any argument, at any time, any place. Just let me know, I will hook you two up. He, at least, has a functioning brain beyond the stem.
Arf, arf.
Good,
Perhaps your dog could explain it to you in dog language which one of you're position was better than mine-er,... i mean your own.
Was it A) Turambar's suggestion that this thread is about pedophile preist, or is is it B) Turambar's suggestion that this thread is not about pedophile preist?
Maybe he can rollover in approval, hump your leg with grat ude of how you've seriously pwned yourself.
I don't have sigs on so I don't have a clue as to what you're referring to (don't care either). But, whatever trips your trigger.
How cute,
Goog thing you're with a loving master in Turambar.
And that Turambar is responsible to have had you neutered.
Good doggy.
It's more of whatever wags your tail. In the case of zunni the admitted dog.
Ok, whatver. You have won by attrition. You have demeaned yourself so greatly that I can no longer find it worthy of my time to debate this issue with the great Gtown.
You know, or so I hope, precisely what I meant with each of those statements. Yet, like a scared little child who knows when he is cornered by a dog that could quite easily tear him to shreds, you have grasped at anything within reach to delay the inevitable. Congratulations, you have succeeded.
You have succeeded in delaying any legitimate argument through means of self-inflicted ignorance for so long that I can no longer stay to finish you off. Congratulations. I will send you a free diaper in the mail to replace the one that you soiled in our confrontation.
If you would provide a mailing address so that I could be done with you, I would greatly appreciate it.
Now, if you choose to argue like a big boy, let me know. I am always around.
He's so composed and grown up that he wrote this.
Yes, I wrote that.
I wrote that in response to your continued usage of that one ignorant quote that you can't seem to comprehend.
I wrote that because you refuse to give into rational debate, because you continue to run scared.
I wrote that because you have pissed me the off by wasting half of my day.
That is why I wrote that.
And you wrote this before i posted anything.
So i wasn't expecting much.
Actually, I was trying to post down to you, but it's obviously still over your head. Maybe you're a ferret?
O' reallllyyyyyyy, as one like yourself who posts all sorts of sarcasms and thus couldn't recognize another sarcastic remark, you're so advanced.
wait....
I forgot to include <sarcasm>
Or do you need a smiley emoticon to illustrate that i was also being sarcastic?
Also, I am not referring to your lack of maturity in that you insult people. I am calling you a child for allying yourself only with that style of argument.
This is a message board, I expect insults, and dish them out myself. I have no problem with that.
You, however, are a pathetic poster who is not worth my time because you refuse to debate. You refuse to drop a school-yard point, which was only made because you lack the comprehension and clarity of wits to understand what was being said.
So, when you learn to argue like a big boy, which means actually arguing my points rather than how you think I said them, I will be back.
That ignorant qoute was your own qoute.,,
I can't believe the serious self inflicted ownage i'm witnessing.
My apologies. Bad adjective to describe the post. I said ignorant to show my disgust towards the whole situation, not to call my post ignorant.That ignorant qoute was your own qoute.,,
I can't believe the serious self inflicted ownage i'm witnessing.
And yet you keep up with the mother f***cking ad hominem bull !
I have simply used your own post, edited none of them, to show how off the wall and how easily you go off on tangents and have no real argument.
Oh and btw,
Yes you do have the time to argue with me.
We're on the bottom of the third page of this thread and i posted in the middle of the first page.
Sarcasm is never pluralized with an 's'. The word is both the singular and the plural.
Those post were not reflective of me administering ad hominem to you.
It was reflecting the multiple dynamic, colorful, varied arguments in which you have no consistency and contradict themselves.
It's not ad hominem if i use your own post.
Oh wow, i'm wounded.
I was hoping for "informed" or "educated", but guess that would be too much.Oh wow, i'm wounded.
And I was hoping for either some animal noise coming from your post or a remark of how Conservatives are scared that sexuals will cottage butthole in church.
You have so much valuable input, why don't you teach Turambar?
Sigh.......
I miss the old days of Zunni's valuable input.
Welcome to the Musuem of turambar85!
With exhibit A) being My freind ZUnni, an example of an unbiased well thought of intellectual. THis guy is a Walking barking Think Tank.
But i advise you to not feed the animals.LMFAO
The Catholic Church IS the sexual Mafia.
Yes, you take the exact quotes. We know that, thank you for restating the obvious.
The flaw comes in your analysis. You take a joke, a post meant only to provide a mime-like mirror into the ignorance of your own posts as the serious views of myself.
You can be forgiven the first time you did this, but even after I corrected you, and told you what I truly meant in that post, you continued to do so.
You have lost any respect I ever had for you. Though I am sure you do not care, I just thought I would point that out.
Earlier before i posted...
Looks like this is one pretentous little queen.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
