I'm suprised it wasn 't full of Mighty Ducks coverage due to the fact that ABC/ESPN is owned by Disney.
It's just more proof that ABC/ESPN loves wasting money.
I doubt they make a profit on the magazine anyway, to them it's just about getting the ESPN brand out there, not pimping basketball.
Who cares?
The trophy still stays.![]()
There....Fixed it for you.
Really? Then how come the 2005 Spurs-Pistons Finals drew better ratings then this year's Finals? Probably because the Pistons were actually a good team that didn't suck ass like the Cavs.
"ESPN: The Magazine ignores Spurs Finals win"
Pop: "I don´t give a sh*t"![]()
Disney sold the Ducks to private ownership two years ago.
Ever hear of the phrase "Move the on jackass"?
AAHHHHH!! Screw the haters cuz we got ours!!
![]()
Spurs fans and LeBron lovers....hmmm...so that was probably about HALF of the PLANET.
Same thing happened in 2005. I thought it was because a couple of issues earlier they had done that "What's Not to Love About Manu and the Spurs?" issue with the adorable pic of Manu on the cover. But I suppose now they are intended slights.![]()
Exactly it is pretty clear in todays NBA that the public want a good series over just star power. This finals proves that. All the media was saying with the Cavs here in the finals and Lebron the ratings will be good. Well they were awful thanks to most people going in knowing that the Spurs were so much better and then sweeping the Cavs easily.
Hard to have a compe ive rating when only one team shows up. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank your Cavaliers for their help in turning this finals into the pile of dog that it was.
Strong work from LeBrick and crew.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)