Usually, people say that I'm a FO apologist. It's too kinda strange to called me anti-Spurs FO for criticizing a move that Spurs haven't done for the moment.
Agree and I wasn't speaking about cheapness too.
Take James White case, Pacers have chosen over him Rawle Marshall. You can think that their thinking was :"White is a so-so project, Rawle Marshall is a slightly better project."
You can't have this reasoning with Williams. If Spurs waive Williams, it can only be because they think that he is an horrible project.
Thanks.
Do you realize that Williams hasn't played a single true nba game ?
I don't see how you can see if a player has enough mental strength to play in the nba while this player has only played summer league and preseason garbage time.
It's not a yes or no thing. It's a more or less thing. After his summer leaguz, Spurs have some reasons to have some concerns about Williams.
However, if Spurs waive Williams while they have no solid reason to keep him, it will mean that they are sure he is bust.
If you are sure that an early second round pick is a bust 4 month after having drafted it, either your scouting has been atrocious or you have been way too fast to judge him.
You can't just look at the result. Some players have qualities but never make it in the nba. If Spurs waive Williams at the end of the training camp, it will mean that they think he has no qualities at all.
If you are that wrong on a player evaluation you can't just say "I was wrong, let's move on."
Marcus Williams will never been considered as a huge failure. What is a huge failure is waiving a player drafted with the 33rd pick before the seasons tart while you have no real incentives to do so.
Did I say "Spurs FO is a huge failure" ? NO.
The fact that Spurs drafted Manu and Tony has nothing to do with Marcus Williams.
Mistakes with second round picks always happen ans aren't a big deal. What will be a big deal with Williams if he is waived, it's the size of the mistake.

Reply With Quote
