Reply With Quote
laughing at them? like voting them control of Congress laughing?
Just BARACK THE VOTE and your voice will be heard!!!
laughing at them? like voting them control of Congress laughing?
"the sole reason Bush wanted to go to war was for oil"
the primary reason, not the sole. the other reasons and timing were equally illegit
"(the very little we get from Iraq)"
the objective was to get A LOT MORE OIL from Iraq (and Iran) under MORE favorable terms than before the war.
but keep paying attention, you are catching on.
Seen Congress lately? Is that what youre bragging about?
You and people like you on the "other" side, deserve this country, seriously you do.
You and people like you are FAR more concerned with party victories than actual VICTORY.
The Dems in control of Congress are just as ignorant and unqualified as the last batch of human waste to sit in their seats. The whole place smells and its going to take a revolution to get the stink out.
You, my friend, are nothing more than status quo. Too scared to change, too loyal to defect and too ignorant to know the difference.
Republican winner needs about 1200 delegates, and 463 are unpledged. Both means if the unpledged delegates all vote in a block, that candidate is 1/3rd of the way to being the nominee.
Aka, the two parties are the same.
AP Delegate Count:
Overall, McCain leads with 707 delegates, to 294 for Romney and 195 for Huckabee. It takes 1,191 to win the nomination at this summer's convention in St. Paul, Minn.
Overall, Clinton has 1,045 delegates, to 960 for Obama with 2,025 delegates required to claim the nomination in Denver at this summer's convention.
MI and maybe FL are making noises about holding "make up" primaries so their delegates get counted. Not sure if that you help Hillary or Barack.
The entire process is a ing embarassing, over-complicated joke to subsidize the campaign industry and media.
Looks like CORSO was wrong about huckabee CORSO
hoh corso!
right.. just own up to the fact that I made your point look shallow and weak.... that's ok man...
Yeah, thats what you did. Just like you declare yourself the winner in every argument youve been in on this forum. Its called self-delusion. You seem to be suffering from it habitually.
The Dems got Congress not because people like Dems. They got Congress for the sake of change. Nothing else. Nada. Zippo. Zilch.
No other reason. Its not like everyone woke up in November 06 and said "Man, feels so goooooood being a Democrat. Cant wait to vote."
Reality is, troubling as it might be for a political hack like yourself, Congress changed hands for the sake of change.
What are you going to say when Congress inevitably goes back to a Repub majority this year or 2010 (im not sure of the total number of elections this year, or if its even possible)?
That the Repubs stole the elections? Its called balance, friend. Hate it all you like, but the 90s were incredible for a number of reasons, but a small portion of the credit goes to the fact that the Congress was Repub and the WH was Demo.
Repubs having control of both Congress and the WH was a political death sentence. That sentence was carried out in Nov 06.
Same will happen to Dems if they control both as well. Balance is all important, not political infatuations.
I think nothing would please you more than Dems controlling both Congress and the WH and being able to appoint some Justices too. you'd cream yourself before you could refresh your webpage.
Yeah, thats what you did. Just like you declare yourself the winner in every argument youve been in on this forum. Its called self-delusion. You seem to be suffering from it habitually.
The Dems got Congress not because people like Dems. They got Congress for the sake of change. Nothing else. Nada. Zippo. Zilch.
No other reason. Its not like everyone woke up in November 06 and said "Man, feels so goooooood being a Democrat. Cant wait to vote."
Reality is, troubling as it might be for a political hack like yourself, Congress changed hands for the sake of change.
What are you going to say when Congress inevitably goes back to a Repub majority this year or 2010 (im not sure of the total number of elections this year, or if its even possible)?
That the Repubs stole the elections? Its called balance, friend. Hate it all you like, but the 90s were incredible for a number of reasons, but a small portion of the credit goes to the fact that the Congress was Repub and the WH was Demo.
Repubs having control of both Congress and the WH was a political death sentence. That sentence was carried out in Nov 06.
Same will happen to Dems if they control both as well. Balance is all important, not political infatuations.
I think nothing would please you more than Dems controlling both Congress and the WH and being able to appoint some Justices too. you'd cream yourself before you could refresh your webpage.
you really have no idea who your talking to. i am not a democrat first of all I am an independent. secondly you made the ridiculous comment that people laugh at the dems..yet the same voted them control of congress... no need to 'win' an argument when the one you proposed is based soley on your opinion.. can you find anything to back up your claim that 'people' laugh at the dems? better yet define the 'people' your referring to? not trying to win but in this case because you have such a weak argument it wouldn't be to hard to beat it.. so let's get back to your original point.. show me your evidence that 'people aren't laughing with the dems but at them'? you can easily review my posting history and find that I am hardly a dem kool aid drinker.. but I guess you don't have to because you already know that..
Now I guess you are going to explain to me what the motives of the each voter was during the 2006 election cycles.. you are the kind of poster who is really good at assigning motives... Why do you do that? because if you couldn't interject people's motives into your argument it wouldn't be able to stand on it's own..
I have NEVER said the Republicans stole any election.. bush won fair and square in 2000 and have never wavered..but hey why am I telling you because you already knoa that..do me favor don't pretend to know me because it painfully obvious you have zero knowledge of who you are dealing with..
And for the record I have already stated that it isn't good for the country when one party has control of all 3 branches... but hey you already know that..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
