Reply With Quote
TORONTO,trying to make a trade they are only 3and half games out of first place in their division 17 and 27. MALIK puts them over the top.Yea right trade won't happend.
I think a poll of any living, breathing, basketball fan would say that our inability to hit an outside shot was our downfall on offense.
Penetration? You're right, LA packed the lane on Tony and Tim, but our outside shooters couldn't do anything to free that cluster inside.
We've got all the big men we need in Massenberg, Horry, and Rasho to go along with TD. Look around at the other western front lines, we're more than adequately covered as long as Tim is healthy (and if he goes down we've got bigger problems than a quality big man).
As for dismissal from the forum, and arguments, you're the one whose sole points on Rose > Marshall consist of epithets about sheep ing, fat s, being an Aggie. Spare me the ing ' rhetoric.
Sean Marks has beat out Rose in the rotation on the sole fact he doesn't make mistakes. He's not a positive difference maker on this squad, but he's not a negative difference maker, which is what Rose is right now.
I'm sorry you're so enamored with your Malik Rose travel mug to comprehend.
TORONTO,trying to make a trade they are only 3and half games out of first place in their division 17 and 27. MALIK puts them over the top.Yea right trade won't happend.
Oh yes, the Spurs magically got cold from the outside. How simple, let's just get better shooters. Funny how in 2003 they weren't collectively cold against LA, yet in 2001, 2002, and 2004 they were. Gosh, I hate it when that happens.
Interesting how when the Spurs had their best PF/C rotation and the Lakers had their weakest that the Spurs shot the best they ever did against LA in the postseason. Simply a matter of coincidence, I suppose.
Your outside shooters can't do anything because they got a man in their face since your opponent owns the paint. This is why you want a much more physical frontcourt so that you can open up the paint to penetration which of course in turn will help get your shooters open looks. The offense doesn't start from 20 feet away. It starts at the rim and works it way out to the shooters eventually.Penetration? You're right, LA packed the lane on Tony and Tim, but our outside shooters couldn't do anything to free that cluster inside.
Massenburg is a clod. There's a time and a place for someone like him, as either a 4th or 5th big. Horry and Rasho are finesse bigs.We've got all the big men we need in Massenberg, Horry, and Rasho to go along with TD. Look around at the other western front lines, we're more than adequately covered as long as Tim is healthy (and if he goes down we've got bigger problems than a quality big man).
Yeah, how dare I call you an Aggie.As for dismissal from the forum, and arguments, you're the one whose sole points on Rose > Marshall consist of epithets about sheep ing, fat s, being an Aggie. Spare me the ing ' rhetoric.
hahhahaha heeehee. oh yes. Marks doesn't make mistakes, he only moves at the speed of a kimodo dragon.Sean Marks has beat out Rose in the rotation on the sole fact he doesn't make mistakes.
Oh yes, Malik is such a negative presence. And Dubya's a great president.He's not a positive difference maker on this squad, but he's not a negative difference maker, which is what Rose is right now.
I'm sorry you're so enamored with your Malik Rose travel mug to comprehend.
Last edited by SPARKY; 02-01-2005 at 03:49 PM.
this trade won't happen, plus, were 37-10, if the system works, don't try to fix it.
I'm 100% sure this trade will not happen.
San Antonio trades: PF Malik Rose (5.6 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 0.7 apg in 16.3 minutes)
San Antonio receives: PF Donyell Marshall (10.1 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 1.0 apg in 23.3 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +4.5 ppg, +2.4 rpg, and +0.3 apg.
Toronto trades: PF Donyell Marshall (10.1 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 1.0 apg in 23.3 minutes)
Toronto receives: PF Malik Rose (5.6 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 0.7 apg in 16.3 minutes)
Change in team outlook: -4.5 ppg, -2.4 rpg, and -0.3 apg.
TRADE ACCEPTED
Due to San Antonio and Toronto being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked. San Antonio and Toronto had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
You have been assigned Trade ID number 2219673
the numbers work but Toronto will want a sweetener...either a two for two taking back a slug for talent or a quality pick with a high percentage of making it in the NBA like Scola...
you guys still want to do this trade if the Spurs had to throw in Scola to make it happen?
It's already bad enough without putting Scola in the mix. The last thing the Spurs need to be doing as long as Rasho Nesterovic is their starting center is getting lighter in the frontcourt.
The Spurs won't do that. Trust me. Scola is very important to the Spurs future.
I feel for you Marcus, I really do.
You're right. The Spurs can pay him much less than Rose and while they won't get the physical player they need, he'll give them the payroll they seek.
I was gonna point out that this guy's arguments were the same as Marcus, and that he sounded like marcus in his childish arguements.I feel for you Marcus, I really do.
Id do this trade in a New York minute.
Malik Rose has regressed to the point of no return.
Oh good, another ignoramus who can't analyze the game to save his life.
Economically, this trade is definintely beneficial for the Spurs.
Right, but should we want the Spurs to be cheap just to be cheap?
I would do this trade, Donyell Marshall can bring it defensively and offensively and is a good rebounder.
But the only thing is, isnt it odd the guy has been with so many teams?
I would be concerned about team chemistry with a guy like that.
But this trade makes sense.
To think Malik's bad play is blamed on his "contract" is pathetic.
Malik's bad play is Malik trying to do way too damn much.
But of course, you know wayyyyy so much than us, the self proclaimed "Retired" genius.
Gee, there couldn't possibly be any connection between the sturm und drang about Lik's contract and his desire to do too much on the court, now could there be?
Even a bump on a log like you should be able to see that.
The pathetic play could be the corrolation?
Nah, his play has nothing to do with it.
What "pathetic play"? Lik's game hasn't changed. He's been as aggressive as he's always been, as prone to both miscue as to pulling down the offensive board of the game.
You can't even describe how you allege his game has changed. You know jack about the game other than that young black men are cool so long as you don't have to acknowledge them as equal human beings.
Is Dizzg down with this deal?
maybe his increasing turnovers, along with his childish stupid act of pulling the jersey over his head are the reasons sir.You can't even describe how you allege his game has changed
Once again, I respectfull ask you to stop calling me a racist.
Lik's always turned the ball over a few times a game. Nothing new.
I'll call you what you are you little turd now go wash your sheets.
[QUOTE]I'll call you what you are you little turd now go wash your sheets[QUOTE]
And you call me and aggie idiots, with intelligent witty banter like this??
Whatever.
Loose your at ude Marcus, just because someone disagrees with you doesnt mean you need to cop the stupid act.
Quit the BS.
I only call you what is appropriate.
I am not a Racist jerk face.
You need proof and a "Link" To prove that one.
Uh oh someone's mad.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
