Post Trade Production - FWIW

**Aggie Hoopsfan** · 04-09-2005

He's also had games of 5 and 4, 2 and 4, but hey give him credit - he's making the most of garbage time in those games you mentioned.

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Exactly how much are you expecting him to score on 6 or 7 shots Aggie?

I suppose you think Nazr is doing better? C'mon tell me that...and take the ty out of Nazr's mouth because Malik dosn't have Tim Duncan either.

News flash... ing Nazr got less minutes in our last game than a mother er who plays no D and was playing in his second game(in back to back no less)in a year...

You think there are going to be more minutes available when Duncan comes back?

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

How does it not?

WTF do you mean how does it not?

Isiah's not the dumbass that thinks Nazr is a franchise C...what makes you think he doesn't realize what Rasho is as well? He realized what Charlie Ward was...

Rasho is a better deal than Thomas...all him wanting Rasho proves is that he wanted to totally screw us instead of just partially...

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Hurry up Chump! Search those archives!

**ChumpDumper** · 04-09-2005

I gave you one to look for too.

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

In conclusion....

Rose>Nazr

We'd be better off with Rose now...and Isiah isn't nearly as stupid as you guys want to believe.

Thank you.

**Aggie Hoopsfan** · 04-09-2005

I love it, we were down 30 and you're trying to hold up an offensive guy like Glenn Robinson as validation

**ChumpDumper** · 04-09-2005

WTF do you mean how does it not?

It disproves nothing. What part of that do you not understand?

**Aggie Hoopsfan** · 04-09-2005

In conclusion....

Rose>Nazr

You failed math didn't you?

We'd be better off with Rose now...

No we wouldn't, he still wouldn't be able to help us when it matters (the post-season).

and Isiah isn't nearly as stupid as you guys want to believe.

Toronto
Indiana
CBA

Next.

**ChumpDumper** · 04-09-2005

In conclusion....

Rose was crimanally overpaid for what he was doing and the Spurs didn't want to put up with 4 more years of his being beat out by every minimum-salary old fart we signed.

We'd be better off with Rose now.

And the NBA is a business.

and Isiah isn't nearly as stupid as you guys want to believe.

The record speaks for itself.

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan

I love it, we were down 30 and you're trying to hold up an offensive guy like Glenn Robinson as validation

I love it...you think Nazr needs rest or something and that's why he didn't get any minutes even in a blowout....hilarious.

I guess you think Nazr's got the whole system figured out now and is being rested for the playoffs.

Newsflash...Nazr didn't play in the first half of that game either....Nazr didn't even get into the game until we were down by 30(or was it 40).

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Rose was crimanally overpaid for what he was doing and the Spurs didn't want to put up with 4 more years of his being beat out by every minimum-salary old fart we signed.

And we criminally overpaid for Nazr...while ing with our le chances...

And the NBA is a business.

And the business is winning les....

The record speaks for itself.

Yeap it does...Isiah 2 Spurs 0

Oh wait...you suddenly discover the ability to look into the past when you think it suits you?

**ChumpDumper** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by whottt

And we criminally overpaid for Nazr.

for only one more year...

while ing with our le chances.

You still pick the Spurs to win.

And the business is winning les....

Nope, unfortunately.

Yeap it does...Isiah 2 Spurs 0

Wake me when he wins a championship as GM.

Oh wait...you suddenly discover the ability to look into the past when you think it suits you?

No more than you.

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Aggie...next time make sure you have been paying attention and maybe...oh, I dunno, seen a game, before you stay in the Nazr wagon.

Honestly if Nazr goes for 10 and 10...even in a loss...I'll be the happiest guy on this board...I don't expect him to not suck...I'd just be satisfied with some meaningless numbers...

Please!!!!!!

**whottt** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

for only one more year...

Great...I hope it ends up being worth it.

You still pick the Spurs to win.

Not because of this damn trade...that's for sure.

I actually feel better since we signed Robinson...that offset the loss...because even if this guy doesn't play D he at least doesn't have his head up his butt.

Nope, unfortunately.

If the business isn't winning les then what's the point of paying Parker, Manu and Duncan all that money?

Wake me when he wins a championship as GM.

Yawn....let's see...he's been the GM of an expansion team...and he took over the worst mess in the NBA in the Knicks...You think Pop or RC would have the Knicks contending for a championship?

I'd just be happy if they had us contending to win a ing game on the road without Tim Duncan.

No more than you.

Great...then this time around use your hindsight to look at his drafts and trades...and tell me what you see that makes you think he doesn't know talent...And no, the absence of Duncan or Garnett on his drafting list does not mean he doesn't know it.

**ChumpDumper** · 04-09-2005

Originally Posted by whottt

Great...I hope it ends up being worth it.

If not he's gone much sooner than Malik, who wasn't getting any better.

Not because of this damn trade...that's for sure.

So? You still think they'll win it all, which is all you care about.

If the business isn't winning les then what's the point of paying Parker, Manu and Duncan all that money?

You'll remember there was much discussion over how much to pay the first two, regardless of les. That's reality. Why live in denial of reality?

Yawn....let's see...he's been the GM of an expansion team...and he took over the worst mess in the NBA in the Knicks...You think Pop or RC would have the Knicks contending for a championship?

I doubt they would've made the trades Zeke did that have them going backwards this season.

I'd just happy if they had us contending to win a ing game on the road without Tim Duncan.

I blame our guards more than anything, but sure Rose could've meant one or two wins.

Great...then this time around use your hindsight to look at his drafts and trades...and tell me what you see that makes you think he doesn't know talent...And no, the absence of Duncan or Garnett on his drafting list does not mean he doesn't know it.

Are they winning more? Good three picks or so. Mazeltov. Try to win more games now.

**Aggie Hoopsfan** · 04-09-2005

Are you illiterate whott?

I have been disappointed with Nazr's play since he got here. I think about everyone we've signed under Pop has taken the better part of a year to figure out our defense. , Malik had 6 years, can't you at least give Nazr one off-season?

I doubt he'll contribute in the playoffs this year, outside of contributing his six fouls inside when needed.

But to pretend Malik would be any different is assenine. He couldn't beat out Massenberg or Horry, that says more about him and his play than anyone ever could.

Rose was crimanally overpaid for what he was doing and the Spurs didn't want to put up with 4 more years of his being beat out by every minimum-salary old fart we signed.

A- ing-men.

**MannyIsGod** · 04-09-2005

I'm going to stay out of this except for one thing.

The NBA is most certainly not a business of winning les. It's a business of pushing your product just like anything else.

**Aggie Hoopsfan** · 04-09-2005

Anyone who trades away their starting center who was averaging 10 and 8 for essentially Malik Rose and Maurice Taylor cannot be associated with an "eye for talent."

Sorry.

**picnroll** · 04-09-2005

Whottt defending Isiah as a GM, spiraling into insanity.

Thread Tools

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions