Reply With Quote
Almost any idiot can learn one language. Learning a second language well usually requires a better appreciation for correct usage.
Most of my business comes from Club poster donations.
Almost any idiot can learn one language. Learning a second language well usually requires a better appreciation for correct usage.
I have book-smarts, 99th percentile standardized test scores, and degrees, but I have little real-life smarts. I think I do well at explaining information to others in a manner in which they can understand it, and that signifies that I truly comprehend it. On the other hand, the world frustrates me. Given the choice, I would rather sit under a tree and read a book.
Since the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body, only left handed people are in their right minds!
All I know is that I've always been really good at staying inside the lines when coloring.
without a doubt it has to be LJ, This guy found a sure fire way not to have his topics locked or deleted he married the webmaster.
Just think you people spend all day kissing Kori's ass and she spends all night sucking his , isn't that one smart mother er?
i didnt take the sat's. i have never taken chemistry in my life, transfered from a CC to a state school, read some books and say discourse at times and thats about it.
SATs don't mean . I don't know how anyone's supposed to reasonably believe you can judge a person's intelligence by how well they did answering a bunch of small and simple problems. On top of that, you can seriously improve your SAT score massively just by studying the format of the test. I went and bought an SAT book with practice exams, and it added 200 points or so to my actual score after a month of study versus what I had when I took the first practice exam. If you don't take a class or buy a book teaching the format, then you're at a huge compe ive disadvantage taking the exam.
/end rant
I have degrees in computer science, mathamatics, and business and I know nothing...
I worked much harder at developing my palate than I did preparing for the SAT or ACT, both of which were taken hung over. Maybe it was just in those days I was drinking Red Dog, Miller Lite Ice, and Beast light...He doesn't post much, but scott has far and away the most interesting thoughts of any person on this forum when he does come here. I'll put leemajors #2 for having good taste in beer.
Doctorate of Pharmacy.. UOP.. STOCKTON CA....
lol.. im an idiot though...
Hmmm...off the top of my head I'd say it(excluding myself of course) comes down to Spurminator, Shoogar, Bruno or Slomo.
I think I'll go with Slomo.
Spurmnator loses points for actually posting in the political forum and attempting serious discusisons. Although he doesn't post in there very often. Ya still can't be a genius if you do that.
Shoogar loses points for being too much of an AJ fan and not enough of a Drob fan. Clearly something is wrong with that picture.
Bruno pretty much owns everyone who argues with him, has figured out how to win arguments convincingly at ST inspite of the culture gap, really quickly, against people that are impossible to win arguments against, and he's like a master of the salary cap as well.
However, I owned Bruno severely in a Lance Armstrong drug argument when he first arrived at this board, I think it's his only black mark.
That leaves Slomo...Slomo is very funny, again inspite of the culture gap he is one of the funniest posters and seems to be exceptionally skilled at multiple things like graphics and running message boards, and I remember one time he translated some article that no even had a clue what language it was(wasn't slovenian either). He also pretty much makes a fool out of anyone that he gets into an argument with, which isn't very often.
I go with Slomo, with the subtractions from the others being:
1. Doesn't post in the political forum.
2. Wasn't an AJ fan.
3. I've never beaten him in an argument(I've never even argued with him actually, then again I don't think I've ever really argued with Shoogar or Spurminator either).
He also gets points for staying in a big way, after the Slovenians left the team.
That explains so much...if you wind up with a 4th one I suspect anyone this side of Casto will be a neo-con.
Mathamatics???
I think I'm going to lock this thread now.
Whottt seems pretty quick. Chumpdumper constantly s on people. I've also noticed that Shoog can analyze situations from angles that most people wouldn't ever take into account.
Underrated: spurs_fan_in_exile
non spurs fan: Findog
Oh _Jag ruined my joke.
Re-opening thread...
You lose points for even putting me in the same league with those other guys.
We argued a bit on Jason Kidd in 2003.I don't think I've ever really argued with Shoogar or Spurminator either).
You won.
I'm going to say myself.
i know i dont have 1000 bucks to prepare for the GRE. im hoping to get into the state school that doesnt require the test cause im probably only going study 1 week for english and , geometry i havent had in 6 yrs
Spurminator still insists that Van Hagar is superior to Van Halen, though.
there has never been anything more set in stone than nbadan owning mannyisgod and chumpdumper in math and science
thats is a fact
SFIE is ridiculously smart, and doesn't give or get enough credit for it. He's also disgustingly good with a sickening variety of trivia facts. He's great at Jeopardy and one of the reasons I married him was to make certain that I would never have to be on an opposite team from him in Trivial Pursuit again.
Want to explain to me why you love Rasho so much?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions