By "this" you mean Lakerfan starts a thread?
By "this" you mean Lakerfan starts a thread?
No, not specifically. Did you, by chance, take the time to read this thread?
He's just a logical, straight-forward fan of the game and doesn't pull punches. There was nothing false about the Lakers scouting George Hill before the Spurs, it's what really happened and he even stated that he was semi-bummed the Lakers didnt get him.
History2b and I are fans of the game first, Lakers second, and players/personnel last. This allows us to talk openly and objectively about the game we know and love.
IOW: "Please love the Lakers. Our self-worth depends on it."
So generally speaking, yes?
I can only hope.
First things first. I didn't come here to "troll" and see absolutely no reason to go to the NBA board here and see how other Laker fans "troll."
I came here to talk about the game of basketball openly and honestly and that principle supersedes everything.
In talking with the Spurs fans that I have so far, I've discovered the true land of delusion. Thus far, there isn't a single poster here worth spit or anyone who's knowledge of the game is worthy of much consideration. My toenail clippings have a higher bball IQ than posters here.
And the great thing about me is that I'll take the "Pepsi challenge" with anyone, any time, anywhere in regard to the game and I'm here for the long haul.
Best case scenario would be that only the best and the smartest Spurs fans talk basketball with me so I can spend less time smacking the fleas like chumpdumper et al off my leg.
Well, guess it's time to move on, hoss. You done wrecked shop and learned us all good, cowboy.
Maybe next time you decide to start a flame thread about the Spurs trio you might want to run that idea by your highly intelligent toenail clippings and maybe they'll tell you how stupid you will look trying to flame Spurs players in a Spurs forum. Emphasis on the word Spurs.
You are both actually lifeless 's first and foremost, with way too much time on your hands..then the rest follows if you say so.
My favorite part about this thread (b/c it involves me), is when I took the time to respond to the article with my own analysis and opinions. Then waited for the OP to respond, b/c although he did not write the article himself he is acting like he did by claiming that other people haven't taken the time to think reasonably like he has.
Then when he comments on my post he merely gives a short compliment, and then continues arguing with people that are calling him a troll. You had your chance to have a real discussion, but since you didn't know how to respond you tried to play it off by sweeping my post aside, and then going back to pretending like you'd done something of worth.
You haven't. You just posted an article that says the spurs have fallen off (change the record btw boston based sports writers), and acted like copying and pasting, then agreeing with what you copied and pasted, cons utes real analysis.
On a personal note: booyah you chump !now gtfo
ing owned
Typical team-first homer post.
blah blah blah....the Spurs say that every ing year and it's getting old. If only we get to see the Spurs every round, the lakers probably go 16-0.
hahahahaha
this got got owned so easily
espn posters are ing bad !! they shouldn't come to ST PERIOD
Nice job WeNeedLength , but you're gonna chase history away from the forum, you damn cyber bully.![]()
I haven't seen him lately tbh...
I want some more threads with potential "Classic" status. It's just too easy![]()
I actually called him out last week about only showing up when the Lakers win. Such a candy ass.
It seems that someone is calling a thread "classic" just about every other thread. These people have a very empty mental trophy case.
A lot of fail by thread starter.
OP should start some more threads tbh
Why can't there be little tokens under your name for the fails you've had, and when you get like 10, you are automatically not allowed to start threads for like 3 months?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)