Manu does that from the 2.
Manu is a point guard in a 2 guard body, tbh.
The only thing Neal sees on the basketball court is the rim and he plays accordingly. Saying he maximizes on that skill set doesnt really mean he has BBIQ, just means he is realistic ( if we are kind) in differentiating what he can and can not do.
Manu does that from the 2.
Manu is a point guard in a 2 guard body, tbh.
but Manu can't defend the point and if he would have to run a team in a constantly way it will wear him out, generally Manu is a two guard!
He can't?
News to me.
So you're saying the reason he's not a 1 is because he's not durable and can't defend other point guards?and if he would have to run a team in a constantly way it will wear him out, generally Manu is a two guard!
Neat.
Kind of like saying TP isn't a PG because his assist stats aren't in double figures, right?
You guys are getting trolled. Arguing this point without a common set of criteria as to what defines a PG is committing yourselves to a battle with no chance of winning.
Mel_13 with the obligatory "you guys are getting trolled" goods.
No.
You said TP has a "classic set of point guard skills"
Define "classic set of point guard skills."
While you're at it, please do me a favor and define "classic set of shooting guard skills" so that we can be on the same page. Thanks.
Pretty much.
Nope. Defining SG skills has nothing to do with my argument. You brought Manu into this. You're deflecting. I'm not playing.
I will defend my statment by defining what I believe to be classic PG skills:
1. Running the offense (calling plays and sets, execution)
2. Ball handling and passing (low turnovers, court vision)
3. Lane penetration (collapsing defenses, opening perimeter)
4. Shooting and scoring (decent outside shot to keep defender honest and abilityto finish in the paint)
5. Defense (keep opposing PGs from accomplishing 1-4)
I'm not deflecting. A list of shooting guard skills would be great to check off to see which Tony fits into more.
1. A. If Gary Neal can do it, is it really a skill?I will defend my statment by defining what I believe to be classic PG skills:
1. Running the offense (calling plays and sets, execution)
2. Ball handling and passing (low turnovers, court vision)
3. Lane penetration (collapsing defenses, opening perimeter)
4. Shooting and scoring (decent outside shot to keep defender honest and abilityto finish in the paint)
5. Defense (keep opposing PGs from accomplishing 1-4)
1. B. Manu runs the offense at times. Is he a point guard?
2-3. Doesn't Manu do that from the 2?
4-5. Pretty standard skills at any position.
You've helped further convince me that Manu is really a 1.
Not much there to convince me that Parker isn't more of a true 2 than a 1.
Again, I am not debating whether or not Manu possesses PG skills. I defined and defended my statement that was in response to your assertion that Parker is not a PG because he does not average double figure assists. The point which you continue to evade and deflect.
lol evade and deflect. My opinion must mean a lot to you.
His low assist totals are just one of several reasons I don't see Tony as a classic point guard.
Not really, no. You're engaging me as much as I'm engaging you tbh.
Why don't you define the specific skills Parker lacks that keeps him from being a PG despite the fact that it is the position that he actually plays?
you engaged first. I'm just being polite.
Plain and simple, he's a scorer more than a passer. Is that something that anyone really disagrees with me on?Why don't you define the specific skills Parker lacks that keeps him from being a PG despite the fact that it is the position that he actually plays?
OK
So, he's a scoring PG? Was Isiah Thomas a PG or a SG? Are you suggesting that Parker has no passing skills?
4th in the NBA in assist % (trailing only Nash, Paul, and D. Williams):
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...der_by=ast_pct
12th in the NBA in point per minute:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/..._by=pts_per_mp
The objective evidence says that he's a PG who scores very well.
A scoring PG it is! Are we done now?
Imo, yes.
A 2 guard in a 1 guard's body, imo.
Isiah averaged 9 assists for his career. Easily a point guard.Was Isiah Thomas a PG or a SG? Are you suggesting that Parker has no passing skills?
And no to the 2nd question.
Lol clearly my opinion doesn't matter to you.
So, according to you a player is a PG if they average over how many assists for their careers?
I've never really thought much about it.
I just know that Tony's career assist average is rather low to call him a classic point guard.
Next up: my opinion on whether Duncan is a true power forward or not.
Will that one end terribly with you resorting to"you care about my opinion" schtick?
Ranking all players who played at least 100 games over the past 20 NBA seasons in terms of assist percentage. Tony Parker ranks 38th out of 1040 players at 32.5%. For comparison, Isiah Thomas ranks 21st at 36%.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...der_by=ast_pct
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)