Jordan didnt go up against such talents as Kobe, Tmac, and Carter? Puh-lease!
What about Dominique Wilkins, Larry Bird, Clyde Drexler, Reggie Miller, Chris Mullin, Steve Smith, Glen Rice, not to mention most likely being guarded by Scottie Pippen in practice almost every day... - heard of any of those guys? Most of them considered better than at least Tmac and Carter, and some most likely better than Kobe (or at least equal).
Consider the Spurs/Pistons of today, versus Jordans bulls. Take the 96/96 bulls, where jordan was still tearing the league up at an older age...
Ron Harper vs Tony Parker - Pretty close, but id probably give the edge to Harper... mostly because of size and experience.
Michael Jordan vs Manu Ginobili - as great as Manu is, is this really a question?
Scottie Pippen vs Bruce Bowen - okay, bruce would probably guard jordan (and get torn up) and scottie would probably guard manu, but you get the point that at both the 2 and 3 we are outclassed.
Dennis Rodman vs Tim Duncan - okay, our first main advantage. Rodman sure wasnt a slouch on defence though... He would of given TD more fits than Rasheed and Ben Wallace, thats for sure..
Luc Longley vs Rasho/Nazr - pretty much a wash...
Id say, we would still lose to that team. Our only main advantage (TD) would of been slaughtered by Dennis/Scottie Dennis/MJ double teams. Not to mention that the bulls were pretty damn cluth in their own right...
If it was the 99 team, then it is a different story. They are probably the only spurs champ team that would have a chance against the Bulls in my opinion. David was still a force (and a force the bulls couldnt of countered), Tim would of been great, Sean would of done alright, but again the bulls guards would of caused problems for Mario, Avery, et al...
While the Spurs are fantastic, theres a reason that team was so dominant.

Reply With Quote
........... a highlight reel that is made up of more than 2/3 of championship footage!
