
Why did he bring up the reeling Clippers? Is that suppose to be impressive or something? Anyways, a lot of that has to do with pace, less possession by opponents = less opportunities to score. They have a very good defense, but historic?

For that, they need to show up at home and on the road. Since the league is dreck this year, there aren't many road games to look at but, vs GS 12O, vs OKC 112, vs CLE 117, vs L

C 105. You'll have me
when they stifle OKC and GS on the road. Also, GS held the Spurs to 18 points below their season average; OKC held the Spurs to 10 points below their season average on 40% FG% (16th in total defense); Cleveland held the Spurs to 12 points below their season average; Clippers held the Spurs to 19 points below their season average. None of those teams are historical defensively. The Spurs are the best overall defense in the league but they're only a percentage point ahead of Atlanta and two percentage points ahead of GS in opponents FG% and I wouldn't consider either of those teams historically great defensive teams. However, if the Spurs were historically great, those teams would have to be in the conversation, wouldn't they?
You may be right but I'm not convinced yet. Let's see how they do against OKC and GS on the road.