SAC, never been there. But good assumption.
What the ? Are you that stupid? You can start my addressing the TV household ranking and per capita income ranking of San Antonio among NBA cities.
My claim is that San Antonio is not an attractive NBA media market. I supported that claim with that specific data.
Actually the TAMU site I use quite often.
As for the other two, yes I googled them.
mn.
Which is where I got the numbers YOU ASKED A LINK FOR.
St. Phillip's?SAC, never been there. But good assumption.
That's good. What does it have to do with the data that clearly shows San Antonio is not an attractive TV market among NBA cities?Actually the TAMU site I use quite often.
As for the other two, yes I googled them.
mn.
Which is where I got the numbers YOU ASKED A LINK FOR.
But smaller ones "were" attractive a few years ago? Did the tend end? Is the new black grey?
I don't get it.
Is your opinion worth more than a bag of sea s s? Probably.
Are you lost in your own world?
Anyway, San Antonio is an attractive TV market.
Ohmigod, there's your much awaited retort.
2004 for the TV data and 2003 for the per capita income data.
If you have more recent data, quote it.
San Antonio was dead last among NBA TV markets in per capita income in 2003, per the BEA.
I thought you said "ADIOS" a while back?
My spanish isn't very good but I'm pretty sure that means: "I just got owned so I'll see ya later."
No, address the data, chump.
Actually that means I went to get a beer.
I thought you had something to refute my claim that San Antonio is not an attractive NBA market. Bring it, you depressed little .
Do you KNOW what PER CAPITA is?
If Bill Gates moved out of Seattle along with his pal Paul Allen, Seattle would probably fall off the list.
Get the median household income list going, see where SA compares.
Come on, I know you can do it. I believe in you.
Yes, I know what per capita means. Do you recognize that the BEA already accounts for outliers?
Try again.
What claim?
The only claims you have gotten correct are well, the obvious ones. I believe Stevie Wonder pointed them out.
1. SA is last in the entire NBA of the whole wide world in per capita income.
2. SA is the fourth smallest TV market in the whole wide world of the NBA.
But then that doesn't go about proving your opinion correct.
Go get the median household income list.
Or does Uncle Derek have to do it?
Let's see, San Antonio has the 3rd lowest number of households watching TV and people there enjoy the least amount among NBA cities in per capita income. Do you really believe that makes for an attractive market? Come on, for a boy who lives with his mother and obsesses about demographic data 24/7 you should be able to comprehend why that does not make for an attractive TV market for companies to advertise in.
Go for it, kiddo.
Uncle Derek? Is that who gives you money for blow jobs?
Ah, aren't we the more sophisticated one.
Wow, broken record.
I live with my mother? Wow, I could have sworn I had my own place. Weird.
Still waiting on your median household income data.
Well it's clear you have none to offer and, per usual, were talking out of your ass because you just had to defend the honor of San Antonio.
Well, here ya go friend:
As of 2003 (the latest data I could find) San Antonio's MHI is just over $41,000. That is up from 1990 when the MHI was 26,049.
Nope. But feel free to think poorer.
No, because I hate when people who essentially "shouldn’t" care about the happenings going on in other city jsut for no reason talk bad about said city.
You know, it's a thing.
Seriously Marcus, explain why you even care about what's happening in San Antonio?
Why you would spend a night battling me over such a small issue?
I feel this bad vibe coming from your handle. Of jealously, envy, the green eyes monster.
Source?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote