Reply With Quote
cool, those emails too... btw, hillary owned the dnc. lmao
You listed stuff from the DNC hack, not Hillary’s emails.
cool, those emails too... btw, hillary owned the dnc. lmao
In other words, you were talking out of your ass. Not a shock tbh.
Inversely, before dumb came out of his mouth every other word once elected, there were a whole lot of sound bytes taken out of context on what Trump said- specifically that Mexicans are murderers, drug dealers and rapists.
And it was her dog whistling the deplorables thing that frenzied her savage, mindless base to keep doing the they did. She dog whistled before Trump ever did.
did she not own the dnc so in essence, she owned their email servers too. talking out my ass would be excusing the nefarious content of those emails because it doesn't bode well for the "candidate" you more than likely backed. still so sour?
And "rhetoric" is not a quote, but that was what she was dog whistling to her base.
You said Hillary’s emails had corrupt in them. I said you were talking out your ass. You listed stuff that wasn’t in Hillary’s emails. I confirmed you were talking out of your ass. You flew into a typical babyrage. The end.
Now call me fat and stupid, completely miss the irony there, and we can be done with this round.
babyrage? claiming it doesn't really matter specific emails because they're all hers in reality. claim what you'd like mono, you're just hard up for the left/evil to prevail.
the irony is the fact that yall will sit here and claim everyone not with yall s are trump shills but when yall do it for hillary/dnc yall aren't shilling. nah, yall actually see your false gods as gods. it's hilarious and that word you brought up earlier too; ironic.
What about Podesta’s emails were suspect? Be specific.
No, but I’d hardly call the DNC rigging the primary for Hillary an elaborate conspiracy. It was a simple strategy and it was done pretty out in the open. There were super delegates who voted in favor of Hillary even though the state they were supposed to represent had voters who wanted Sanders. There were s like Sarah Silverman at the convention who literally gave speeches telling Bernie supporters to “stop crying about it”.last time i checked, you don't have donors, employees of news networks, and others emailing you about rigging debates, money transfers, et al.
In the end though, Hillary lost the election and it was largely due to putrid turnout from Sanders supporters in Wisconsin/Michigan who felt disenfranchised, so what the DNC did didn’t work.
Coal Bear strikes hard and true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMtT_tPl_F0
Exactly. Then you have the bored basement conspira s that buy into some 4chan/twitter troll writing in riddles that there's some Area 51/child abductions/satanic cult/templar bull on those emails.
Then we get a 65+ page thread here with gullible people deeply obsessed about it.
In essence, the simplest explanation is normally the correct one. Which is why pursuing this is catering to the Cosmore loons, and makes no sense.
anything to wiggle out of criminal charges for your darling hrc i see. it's too common with yall lefty's; hate trump and want to hang him high but let hrc walk because she's just some dumb old granny. too comical.Exactly. Then you have the bored basement conspira s that buy into some 4chan/twitter troll writing in riddles that there's some Area 51/child abductions/satanic cult/templar bull on those emails.
Then we get a 65+ page thread here with gullible people deeply obsessed about it.
In essence, the simplest explanation is normally the correct one. Which is why pursuing this is catering to the Cosmore loons, and makes no sense.
What should Hillary be charged with? In your own words?
lmao at you lame trolls and your lame played out shtick that seems oh so common between a few of you and especially with one of you. the whole marry-go-round of stupid ing attempts to corner me when you could do a very basic google search. don't worry about my own words when plenty of higher ups in politics and the government have said the same. go do some research and read what people in power have to say and not what some dude on a message board thinks.
if you're going to ask such an asinine question then let me do the same of you. what should hillary not be charged with? in your own words that is... lmao
You said Hillary wiggled out of charges. What charges?
She should not be charged with anything.
There, that was pretty simple.
Now, in your own words, what should she be charged with?
you're a ing re djohn so i'm not going to try and dumb anything down for you. just google. i'm not here to prove anything to you or anyone else. don't like my opinions, without citations, then go do some research of your own or dismiss them but never ever should you expect me to bow down to you and do the leg work for you. i despise those like you and don't give 1 about what you demand of me.
good luck with your google'n!
^^^
i'm the one stalking the sucker named pav, right?
i'm the one going out of my way to bug pav, right?
i'm the one who can't ignore pav, right?
etc...
this just can't stop replying to me or mentioning me and here comes the notifications again.
just off already you ing beta ass got!
You can’t even name what crimes you accuse her of committing?
plenty and in numerous threads that you've participated in... not my fault you're a ing re who can't do a simple google search. how'd you ever learn to turn on a computer in the first place?
So name them. What are they? “Plenty” isn’t a charge.
you're so ing dense & illiterate too or maybe it's just that your reading comprehension is shot. it, i'd say your dense and that'll do to cover all bases.
I think these dumbass conspiracies are even too complex for Koriwhat since he can’t name a single charge.
Imagine being dumber than Chris. That’s what you get with KW
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
