now we know why he doesn't even try to ask for permission to use popular songs
"Tom wrote this song for the underdog, for the common man"
Exactly why it fits in this context. Who cares what his spoiled children think.
now we know why he doesn't even try to ask for permission to use popular songs
Liberals think we need to ask permission to play music.![]()
If it’s copyrighted then you sure do.
No. Copyrights regard commercial use of materials.
It’s a bit murky but read this:
https://www.abajournal.com/news/arti...rallies_some_l
Of course you have to ask for permission and/or pay a license for copyrighted works. It's called the Public Performance right.
Under the public performance right, a copyright holder is allowed to control when the work is performed "publicly." A performance is considered "public" when the work is performed in a "place open to the public or at a place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances are gathered." A performance is also considered to be public if it is transmitted to multiple locations, such as through television and radio. Thus, it would be a violation of the public performance right in a motion picture to rent a video and to show it in a public park or theater without obtaining a license from the copyright holder. In contrast, the performance of the video on a home TV where friends and family are gathered would not be considered a "public" performance and would not be prohibited under the Copyright Act.
Same thing with public display...
That's what the artist can do if the campaign paid for the music already but the artist doesn't like it.
Candidate of Law and Order acts as if he’s above the law. Shocker.
This was never a thing 'till the McCain/Romney campaigns when certain artists complained and they capitulated. This not based on law whatsoever.
Yea, of course BMI and ASCAP swooped in and acted like it was.
Once music is released into the public domain, it is what it is. If you throw a party, you don't call up Tom Petty's people and ask permission to do so.
This is America, not the USSR. People have rights.
You appear to be citing someone's opinion and not an actual law.
His songs are not public domain. You don't buy songs and music, you license them. And no, you can't do whatever with a music you "bought", you are limited by the terms of the license.
You license them for commercial use. Otherwise, they are used. If you have a big little league kickoff party in the community you just play whatever music. You don't license it.
Again, this was never a thing until these gots pretended it suddenly was.
Fear of black people and no women. What a life
If every seat had been filled you'd be clutching your pearls about COVID instead.
Many showed up. What's your excuse gonna be when nobody wants to head out to a Zombie Rapist rally?
What did trump talk about tonight, derp?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/21/s...lly-tulsa.html
Owned by Tik Tok teens and K-Pop fans.![]()
Looks like a normal Spurs game
17 U.S. Code § 106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted works
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/106
Irrelevant.
Trump expected a packed house. He got a sandwich. That’s it and that’s all![]()
Citing fake laws from Cucknell. We all know Derp only trusts Tulsa Community College education, which he would have gone to if he went to college.
So, you're just speaking as Democrat fanboy. That's your right.
Three possibilities here:
1. You didn't read that.
2. You did read it but didn't understand it.
3. You read it and understood it doesn't apply and said f*ck it; I'll post as if this is an authoritative refutation.
My money is on 3. But I can't say I'd be surprised by it being 1 or 2, as you are pretty ignorant.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)