Yes, but because there are those willing to take on those responsibilities, it's no longer an unwanted parasite.All options make the child dependent on someone else for survival. It's still a parasite.
All options make the child dependent on someone else for survival. It's still a parasite.Once the child pops out, there are options besides being raised by the birth mother....
Plus the birth mother has those options when its in the womb. She just has to wait a little while.
If she doesn't like waiting, don't .
Yes, but because there are those willing to take on those responsibilities, it's no longer an unwanted parasite.All options make the child dependent on someone else for survival. It's still a parasite.
"That's illogical"
I agree, but that's a moral issue. Should we make ing illegal? Why not nip it at the bud?If she doesn't like waiting, don't .
It's still a parasite.
hehehe...let me guess...you have no intentions of changing dirty diapers do you?...![]()
When the child is in the womb it is 'theirs' and they can destroy it. I see no reason why it should be any different once it is outside the womb.
Because there are others who can take care of it. When it's in the womb, there are no other options.
Um no. That's the "woman's right to choose"...Should we make ing illegal?
Doesn't matter if there are others who can take care of it. It is still dependent on them as much as it was before. It is their child. It is a part of their bodies. The government shouldn't have the right to interfere with what they do to their own flesh and blood.
Forcing childbearing on someone who does not wish to carry one for 9 months is a bit of a drastic punishment for having sex.
It's not a part of their bodies when it's out of the womb.
It is now dependant on society as a whole. It is the society's responsibility to care for it. Most often, the mother fills that role, but if she chooses not to, another segment of society is ready and willing to fill that role.
That's life. Blame God, Mother Nature, Mister Rogers, LL Cool J, or whoever.Forcing childbearing on someone who does not wish to carry one for 9 months is a bit of a drastic punishment for having sex
Sure it is.It's not a part of their bodies when it's out of the womb.
When it's in the womb is it not a part of "society"?It is now dependant on society as a whole. It is the society's responsibility to care for it. Most often, the mother fills that role, but if she chooses not to, another segment of society is ready and willing to fill that role.
LOL.That's life.
Not here.
That's not very logical. So one persons choice is more important than another persons life?
I have a much easier time understanding people that are pro-choice who do not believe life begins at conception. I don't see how you can logically have it both ways.
How?Sure it is.
No, because no segment of society besides the mother can care for it.When it's in the womb is it not a part of "society"?
Sure but is "here" right?Not here.
Then the society could care for the child by caring for the mother.No, because no segment of society besides the mother can care for it.
I thought liberals were way out there.
Where'd the sperm and egg come from?How?
Let's say each eni y.. mother and child... has an equal right to its own body (which I believe). If they were separate, then neither has any right to harm or feed off of the other. But they are not separate. The embryo is dependant on the mother. Therefore, in keeping with the mother's right to her own body, she has the right to rid herself of that responsibility.That's not very logical. So one persons choice is more important than another persons life?
I have a much easier time understanding people that are pro-choice who do not believe life begins at conception. I don't see how you can logically have it both ways.
Otherwise, you give the embryo more of a right to the woman's body than the woman herself.
It came FROM the parents. It's no longer a part of the parents.Where'd the sperm and egg come from?
If I give you ten dollars, it's no longer a part of my assets.
God doesn't matter though I thought.
Not legally, He doesn't.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)