Reply With Quote
Well, at least you respected one of their opinions. That's good enough for me, particularly when the opinion was derogative towards yourself. Why should I argue with an opinion, you respect, that characterizes you as a racist?
Hey, two internet dumbasses, one an exposed liar and admitted thief, called me a racist. I just don't feel that bad about it. They're wrong.
Well, at least you respected one of their opinions. That's good enough for me, particularly when the opinion was derogative towards yourself. Why should I argue with an opinion, you respect, that characterizes you as a racist?
I respected it more than yours, "very, very little" > "none at all." RIF.Well, at least you respected one of their opinions.Why should I argue with an opinion, you respect, that characterizes you as a racist?Are the words too big for you?They're wrong.
Okay.
No, but since I discount everything you post -- except, of course, for when you actually respect an derogatory post about yourself --, your "They're wrong" assessment carries little weight.
And since you're a dumbass, liar and thief, I have no problem knowing you're wrong.
Ah, but dumbasses, liars, and theives have all been right, at times. Therefore, knowing I'm wrong is not a function of my being a dumbass, liar, or thief. My being wrong would necessitate you not being a racist.
And, all I have to go on is your admission that you respect the opinion of someone who called you one.
Nah, knowing I'm not a racist is all I need. That I respect someone more than you should be no surprise.
So, why are you so adamant about demonstrating my being a dumbass, liar, or theif invalidates the (more then me) respected opinion of a third party? I didn't bring him into the discussion, you did.
If you knowing it is all you need, why involve this poor guy from another forum? But, now that you did, I'm choosing to trust his opinion, over yours, because, well, no one would invoke the opinion of a third party that derogates themselves unless it has some merit.
It was a joke for viewers of that thread in the basketball forum.If you knowing it is all you need, why involve this poor guy from another forum?Being a dumbass yourself, you are a noted follower of dumbasses. This is no surprise.But, now that you did, I'm choosing to trust his opinion, over yours
I don't read the basketball forum and you were addressing me.
Obviously, I disagree with this characterization and, I can't point to any other posters -- whom I respect -- in this or any other forum that have made a similar characterization.
Yeah, the same ploy you use against Secretary Gates and President Bush. It's a Leftie speciality.
I'm all for Gates. I hope he's better than Rummy, though I know that's setting the bar pretty low.
I hope he works out. Ten more dead american soldiers today.
You keep saying this as if it's what the thread is about.
You keep bringing it up, dumbass.
You have trouble with separating ideas and with critical thinking. The topic I keep raising is that you take things out of context, Secretary Gates' testimony and President Bush's statement as a more recent example. I've not said anything about whether or not Gates is a satisfactory appointment...but, you have...about 3 or 4 times now; and, in response to posts that have nothing to do with that.
No, you keep saying I'm against Bush in his nomination of Gates. Quite the contrary. You do need it pointed out to you since you don't get it. That there is a disconnect between what he said and what the president said is a good thing in my mind. Your doing cartwheels to try and say they are exactly on the same page doesn't work and in this case isn't even desirable.
No the question is: When do we start pulling out and
declare the crooks the winner. Can't we just get along.
So do nothing about LA?When do we start pulling out and
declare the crooks the winner.
Quote me. And, since you say I "keep" saying it, quote me multiple times.
No, I never said they were exactly on the same page.
No we surrender. Cut and Run. Well we have really already
done that, haven't we?
Have we?
Yep. We have. We no longer enforce our laws.
So the terraist have already won in LA and Miami.
All the more reason to make more abroad.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
