you're way off. comparing Chuck to Tim doesn't fit. Chuck could run and jump.
he may be a great swimmer and basketball player (the best, imo), but he isn't a great athlete.
yeah cause being great at two sports, isn't the qualification for a great athlete.
you're way off. comparing Chuck to Tim doesn't fit. Chuck could run and jump.
not necessarily...no.
This is basketball and swimming. Not bowling and darts.
a great pitcher in baseball, whom happens to be great at golf...that makes him a great athlete? no.
Is that basketball and swimming? And yes it more than likely means he is a great athlete. And Tim Duncan is a great athlete. No matter how you slice it.
apparently, we disagree on what a great athlete is. good day to you...
Yes we do. Peace out.
Not just you and him, I would guess.
I would also propose:
NBA Player = Great Athlete at least 95% of the time.
It's the sole reason I made, and won, this bet. Simple money, frankly.
1. i'd say the NBA = more like 80% great athletes, but i think you and i understand each other
2. i would think most people made the bet b/c barkley is 43 and bavetta is 67. i am not a professional athlete and would have destroyed barkley in that race...
i bet on Bavetta on this one, But lost
but who cares?
i love the Charles Barkley/Bavetta lips-to-lips/smack @ end of the race.![]()
...that was funny. i still don't know why it happened, though?
you just don't know how Charles & love eacheach other.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)