Reply With Quote
No-class, huh? Wouldn't that describe fans of a player who cheap shots an opposing player who has shown nothing but class?
Lol, you and Martigan must go to the same highschool.
No-class, huh? Wouldn't that describe fans of a player who cheap shots an opposing player who has shown nothing but class?
No, but it's clear that some Spurs fans will rationalize just about anything.
How? Do you sell drugs?
I think that if Amare and Diaw had never left the bench, Horry would not have been suspended. It's a transparent make-up call. Horry's hit was justifiably punished as a Flagrant 2.
I think they tried, hard, to justify suspending Duncan, as part of the make-up call, but they just couldn't do it. So they made Horry's suspension 2 games.
Yes, actually. Google "I will not be mishandled".
1 game for the foul on Nash.
1 game for the forearm on Bell.
If they were looking for a make-up call, Horry would have gotten 3 or more games.
No. But I am pretty well connected. Haven't had your fix today? The only reason I ask is cause you are so quick to bring that subject up! Closet Crack fiend!
I figured as much.
Professional basketball, like any professional sport is a compe ion. You look for any advantage you can find. Whether it's physical prowess, superior skill or even mind games.
IF Horry's intention was to start an altercation and get a few Suns suspended, then it was a mind game that worked to perfection.
Don't blame Robert Horry for Amare and Diaw's stupidity.
By that line of argument, I guess we should applaud Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds. After all, they were just looking for any advantage they could find.
I do agree with the suspensions, I don't like it, but rules are rules. Truthfully, it really sucks ass that two guys are too stupid to keep their ass on the bench. I couldn't care less about Diaw, he's been too busy planning Parker's bachelor party since last off season to even give a damn about playing basketball, but the loss of Amare hurts. He hasn't played smart the whole series. As far as the flopping, both teams flop, the refs have lost control of the series, they have let too much crap go for too long on both sides.
Actually, when McGwire was juicing, there was no rule against it. And, while I do believe Bonds is or was juicing, there is no actual proof that he is.
Also, I wasn't talking about shooting yourself up with human growth hormone. Maybe Horry did it with the intention of getting in the Suns players' heads, maybe not. The only person who really knows the truth is Robert Horry himself. Either way, the blame is on Amare and Diaw for leaving the bench. If they had stayed put, the only argument would be whether Horry was punished too harshly which, in my opinion, he wasn't.
They're great. Next time we floor Nash, maybe the Suns will lose even more guys.
Nevertheless, the consensus is that their accomplishments are tainted.
I think Horry was frustrated that Nash had just led the Suns to stealing a win in San Antonio.
I hereby vow to stop intentionally using terms like "All you Suns fans" from now on.
Still seems to me like all he did was seal the victory. Anyone know what the score was when he did that? I think the Spurs weren't down more than two or three.
It was 100-97 Suns with 18 seconds left.
They could've done the Spurs a favor and not handed us the series, but I guess all the fairweather fans that didn't have faith in our team got what they wanted.
I don't agree with the Horry suspension. Hard foul to Nash and Raja went after him. I'd throw that elbow at someone coming after me too. The rules say Diaw and Amare are out one game, I agree, but Raja should have gotten some kind of fine at least or one game suspension.
amare and diaw should not have been suspended .... horry got the right amount - 2 games ... one for the forearm / hip check and one for the forearm thrown at bell ..... this ruling rewards the team that committed the foul ..... you get 30 points sitting out for the suns vs. 7 for spurs ......unfair to say the least ... how would the spurs bench react if tony parker was thrown into the boards by a SUNS sub..... fair is fair .... if amare and diaw are to suspended (rule is rule argument) the horry should have gotten 3 games .....sucks ... such a great series reduced to this controversy ..... horry tainted -"cheap shot rob" ....
pop is off of this one too - calling Horry foul not too bad - please dont complain when pistons do the same to parker / ginobli .... you cant have it both ways .... sorry guys .. bad taste in mouth .....
Look up Derek Anderson and Juwan Howard.
I swear, most of you Suns fans are complete pussies.
Too . . . many . . . ellipses. . .
Seems like an extraordinarily bad time to intentionally give the top free throw shooter in the league two shots and the ball.
Please.
All things considered, Horry's foul wasn't that bad. Cheap shot and unwarranted, yes. Dirty and devastating, hardly. It was a solid bodycheck. That's all. Nash wasn't even stunned by it.
Doesn't excuse Horry, but let's put it in perspective.
Wow, calling people "pussies" over the internet. A true sign of toughness.
Most Suns fans aren't mad at San Antonio for Amare and Diaw getting suspended. That's on Stern and Stu.
But how can you be happy with Amare and Diaw being suspended for this? Wouldn't you rather beat the Suns at full strength?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions