Reply With Quote
Agree or not, rules are rules.
I don't think any one is surprised by it.
Do you agree with the suspension?
Agree or not, rules are rules.
I don't think any one is surprised by it.
i like your boobs.
Rules are rules. Robert had to go for what he did, Staudamire and Diaw should have stayed on the bench.
I think it sucks.
It was a bad foul by Horry. He's not a "dirty player", but It was a bad foul. Nash did flop a little, but once again, it was a bad foul. Amare and Bell both stepped on the court when they weren't supposed to. I agree with the suspensions.
I agree with it as the rule is written - but i think it's a stupid rule. I don't think Amare/Diaw should be suspended, but more than that, I think the rule should given room for interpretation. Amare/Boris were never a threat to get involved, and that should be taken into account in these situations.
"Rules are rules". Bull . We have rules as guides, we have brains to interpret rules through context.
Amare and Boris should have been slapped on the wrist and fined, and Rob should have gotten a game.
These suspensions forever taint this series. If we win it, people will always say that it was because of the suspensions. It's the asterisk all over again. I want to win fair and square or lose fair and square.
I agree with what you said, but remember that other NBA stars have been suspended for far less. That doesn't change the fact that this sucks, but it does mean that the NBA is consistent, if nothing else.
I agree that Stoudemire and Diaw should be punished (according to statute), but I don't agree that the series should be compromised because of it.
I don't think Nash flopped. He was going full speed, and then he hit the table hard. And did you see the look on his face afterwards? He looked insane!
Nash flop backfires.
Ill take consistency (whether bad or good) over being inconsistent. What pissed me off about last night is that the refs were inconsistent. Calling touch fouls and not muggings...didn't make much sense.
I say - the NBA has made up for the inconsistencies of last night.
Basketball gods were pissed at the nba for putting neis and javie in the same game and made sure they fixed it.
I vote................this is a BS poll. Take your poll to a Suns board so you can get the results you want to see.
BTW, I like ur boobs too.
it's not about agreeing with the Suspension. The NBA did what they had to do, what they been doing for years and years. they are being consistent.
I disagree with the rule. It's stupid. they need to polish it up.
I still think that the best out for the NBA was to suspend Horry/Bell for one game since that was the epicenter of the scuffle and rule that Amare and Diaw were still "in the vicin y" of the bench. Even if they had intent to join in and gang bang Horry their coaches restrained them near the bench before the brawl got to critical mass.
But ...I'll take this decision LOL.
If Spurs win game 5 and the Suns fold in the next two games at full strength they deserved to lose.
If Spurs lose game 5 they deserve to lose the series and probably will.
Ditto.
I agree with the suspension, because the rule is the rule, and precedent shows how consistent the league is with it...besides, if Amare and Diaw were in the game at the time, and this was Jalen Rose and James Jones coming on the court, no one would be discussing anything. Superstars are NOT above the law here. The rule is really designed to prevent someone on the court from getting blindsided by a bench player when an altercation takes place.
i getting sick of all these spurs fans saying these suspensions suck you
if the heads knew how to sit the down they wouldnt be in this sitution in the first place and so what if we win i'll take it
The rule was put in place after a series of nasty cat fights between MIA and the NYK back in the day. The league is just reminding peeps that it is STILL in place and that you don't leave the bench. Ever.
yes. rules are rules.
horry was stupid and amare and diaw shoulda kept thier seats.
but I am iffy on the 2 game for Horry.... I think it shouylda just been the 1 game. It's almost as tho the nba is trying to make sure it;s known that they view Horry;s hard foul as the bigger offense. which is a "no " item... but apparently they want to make that point.
I knew the Spurs were going to get the upper hand when it came to suspensions. The Spurs for some reason always seem to draw the weakest suspensions in league history.
I still don't know what Ron Artest did in Game 1 last year to warrant a suspension.
I didn't particularly want to see the suspensions, but I knew what was coming.
You can't blame the Spurs because they had no part of deciding who was suspended. It might suck but it's time to move on and get Game 5.
No, it's BS
rules are rules...no need to break them....if you do then what good are they?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
