Why do people argue with re s?
Zig, you may not get this, but we both read your posts. This isn't a PM.
You're not talking in a vacuum. This is a message board. We can comment on all your posts, not just the ones directed at us.![]()
Why do people argue with re s?
Again - I am aware, but then there is also netiquette. There can be side conversations in a thread. I have been very reasonable with you and our posts. I have been a little more condescending with Mr. Ambchang. That should not give you the right to fire at me and take personal shots.
Exactly my point! Thank you! He is young and immature. That was the initial thrust of this thread if you read it.
Boredom? Slow work day? Bah, you're right, he's just bringing me down to his level.
I'll leave with this:
LeBron has class. You can see it in the way he carries himself, the way he talks. His tatoos, his arguing with the refs, doesn't take away from that.
So stick with arguing LeBron is not humble. With that, I'll agree.
But beating him up over his reaction to a foul, especially when he handled it very well, is just stupid and warrantless.
The Witness tatoo was recent and so was the Chosen1 - y = immature.
Confident = mature!
Horry was crying about getting fouled on a 3 pointer at the end of the first half and it was less contact than what Lebron received. This argument isn't huge in my opinion. It was a big play. It ended the series for the Cavs. If anything Lebron is known for not caring enough. This doesn't bother me.
Again - I refer you to my initial post. I was just pointing out that he is y and immature. After 4 pages of posts, it looks like we agree on that.
So when you are having personal attacks to me, and then lecturing somebody else on personal attacks, this does not translate into hypocrisy?
See, with my lack of a college diploma, I had to look up dictionary.com to make sure that I got the words right, but then:
sorts of fits to you a "T", doesn't it?
LeBron took the weight for the loss last night. He get props from me for that alone.![]()
and yet THIS quote:
was left out of you quoting yourself.
So what was the relevance of that above paragraph when the sole intent was so show how immature LeBron is with all those tattoes?
To show that we don't need college diplomas.
See, you got it all wrong! It was his tats that was the problem! Him arguing with the refs have nothing to do with it, or so I am told.
Wow - Didn't know I had to put on my professors hat...Well in your case HS Teacher's hat.
Netiquette is a catch-all term for the conventions of politeness and respect recognized on Usenet, in mailing lists, in live chat systems, and on other electronic forums such as Internet message boards.
On message boards, in the same threads, you can have several conversations going on. In this particular thread many people were giving me their opinions of what I posted to start this thread. Now by using the "quote" button, it implys that you are sending a message directed to the person that you are quoting. By doing this, you create side conversations. Now let me remind you that ALL conversations can be read, but it is good netiquette to not interfere with others side conversations. This is something that you need to work on. Like LeBron(MadDog), you are young. It will come with maturity.
Well no, no that is not the case. A mature player would come off as being sincere in the PC. LeBron(MadDog) was anything but.
Absolutely. I thought I was watching a real split personality at the press conference...
What does that have to do with not being a hypocrite? So when a priest starts going around molestering children, that does not make him a hypocrite as long as he didn't tell the victim not to molester children?
I doubt you have a HS teacher hat, because a HS teacher needs a post grad degree, and your inability to understand simple definitions of words sends severe doubts as to whether you have one.
Who was the commentator that said he should go to the media so that the next game would be called more favorably? Someone said that.
Please explain how I am a hypocrite? Because I attacked your education and not MadDogs??
So you are now a psychologist as well?
Let me see you train of logic, if a person sounds insincere to you, it would be a FACT that said person is immature, classless and y, and that anyone who disagrees with you are "lambs" and "on crack".
I happen to think that you are immature, classless and y because you happen to sound insincere to me on this board, and if you disagree, then you must a lamb on crack.
Wowwhere do I begin? The lack of grammar? Twisting of words?
And it seems like you neither have a Cerebral Cortex nor an ability to view page 3 of this thread.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...4&postcount=74
Start any where you prefer. In fact, I would love for you to point out my grammatical errors for I would enjoy learning about grammar on a basketball forum.![]()
And how did I twist your words? How did the following quote not show that you have directly called people "lambs" for not agreeing with your statement that Lebron is immature? How does it not say that you said people are on crack if they didn't believe Brown and Ferry did not instruct James' behaviour in front of the press?
Tell me, for I would like to know how the mind of a genius works.
Ok Again, and this is the last time I will post this for you. The first quote you posted there is a reply directed to MadDog. The second quote is directed to you.
This is not a case of hipocrisy. I direct you to the netiquette post I directed toward you several posts ago. In there I explain how you can have side conversations with people in a single thread.
Now if I made fun of your lack of a diploma and then was upset that YOU personally attacked me, that would be hipocrisy. See the difference?
zig just seems too caught up in hammering his point than recognizing his argument. this has nothing to do with how classy/mature lebron is, there's no way to tell precisely because he was going through a rehearsed response in the postgame interview and his behavior on the court was typical of any ballplayer, not an iota more mature or immature than daniel gibson or tim duncan in the situation. the point, though, is how the media has crafted this "oh, what a gracious and classy answer" response to the question of bowen's foul, which doesn't withstand the light of day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)