Randy Moss will be the downfall of the Patriots.
Randy Moss will be rejuvinated with the Pats. He is going to be an up and spirited person knowing how much fun he will have with that team. He doesnt even have to be the Moss he used to be for them to win in terms of putting up monster stats. With that team it will be alot more balanced but he will easily have over 1,000 yards receiving.
I read an interview on Comboys.com that all the players are super excited about the playbook he is bringing to the table that he is very inventive, of course you would expect them to say that.
Also that Wade has a new nickel d where Roy lines up at lb next to Burnett, Watkins and Hamlin at safetys, and Ware and Spenser at the ends, crazy
now you are starting to remind me of spursdynasty. waffling on everything. lolThere we go!BTW just to let you know I lied about the real reason why I HATE the Patriots! All those moves they made piss me off because they were all great signings. In others words I am jealous that a team I dont like all that much has the most talented team in the Brady era. I hate them because they are so ing successful and as long as Brady is at the helm, they will never be out of a game despite all their injuries. They know how to win consistently! Tom Brady having Randy Moss and Stallworth to throw to along with their defense getting even stronger and having a God of a coach like Bilicheck. These moves make their team so disgusting that it is hard to see them fail. Yeah I said it, the Patriots have a GREAT chance to win it all. Hate aside and just a true honest answer, I feel they are winning it all.
Randy Moss is the Truth.............but I hate the Patriots!
I think Dallas will be lucky to win 8-9 games. People often forget how good Parcells was at drawing the best out of his QBs. And I don't see Hamlin as an upgrade in the secondary at all.
I'm going with the dark horse pics:
Ravens vS. Eagles
If Clinton Hart and Marlon Mcree where good enough in Phillips system in San Diego, I think Hamlin and Williams might be ok next year, especially with better corners around them than the Chargers have.
The Cowboys, to me, are an unknown because nobody has any idea which Romo will show up; the guy who had a 120+ rating in November or the guy who had a 77 rating in December?
I'm leaning towards the latter...
The NFC isn't winning for a long time so I don't see how anyone can honestly pick Dallas without being a complete homer.
I'll take the Pats over the Saints in a close game. 24-20.
When you have to play from behind, the way Romo had to do in December, yeah your QB rating will drop. Its the former dude...
Arizona Cardinals v. Houston Texans
It will be the first Super Bowl to go to triple overtime.
The Cardinals will win because it's Houston they're playing against.
It will be that or . . . Houston will lose a 32 point halftime lead and lose it all in overtime.
But seriously . . .
Dallas Cowboys V. San Diego Chargers
Dallas wins in an upset.
Norv Turner commits suicide in the offseason.
EXACTLY.
I'm going to say unless Wade is totally inept and he starts to medal. We are more than an 8-9 win football team. Dallas has one of the most explosive offensive talent in the league and one of the most talented and youngest defenses in the league who only needs better play calling and to become much more aggressive in the 3-4 defense.I think Dallas will be lucky to win 8-9 games
great point, insightful, yet tastefully done
cause they beat your Colts.
although i dont expect them to get out of the NFC. but Dallas might be the one team from the NFC that can beat the AFC in the Superbowl. Dallas was the only NFC team last year to have a winning record vs the AFC.
Thats a little misleading with wins over the Texans and ans, but I also agree tp a point. People are acting like the AFC has just manhandled the NFC in the Super Bowl the last couple of times, but the Colts and Steeler games where closer than the score indicated, and the Pats needed 3 game winning fgs to win their games, which the NFC had a chance to win all 3. I dont think the NFC is a better conference, but I do think whichever team makes it out has a good chance to win it
My indecisiveness has worked miracles.
2005 I sided with the Seahawks to win it.
2006 I picked the Bears.
Since I now am siding with the Broncos you can expect them to BE there...(that is my only super power)
So the other side will probably be the Bears thanks to the solid coach from Texas Lovie Smith.
Yeah I got such a kick out of all the Dallas fans who were at the SB party I went to. After the game they were all high-fiving each other and saying like "We really won the SB because we beat the Colts in the season YEAH!" Whatever makes you feel better, I guess...
And XLI was actually further apart than the score indicated. Indy owned Chicago in the second half. The score should have really been 29-10, but there was that unfortunate special teams up by Indy on the opening KO. I can only imagine if that game wasn't played in the rain, Indy would have blown them out soooooo bad.
I'm sure there's a little homer in me in that judgment, but no team with Rex Grossman as their QB is going into the SB as the favorites or even as an underdog with a "good chance" of winning. XLI was decided the second Marlin Jackson picked Brady in the AFC le game.
See I think your wrong on this. I'm not a fan of Rex, but I also know that winning a Super Bowl isn't all about your quarterback. The Bears can win the Super Bowl the same way the Steelers did in 2005 and the Ravens in 2000, with defense and pounding the ball down your throat. Ben Roethlisberger isn't much better than Rex Grossman. The difference is that the Steelers don't let Big Ben hurt himself. He only throws 15-20(at the max) times a game, many of these passes being under 10 yards. We saw what Ben did when he was asked to throw more in 2006 when he finished the year with one of the worst QB ratings in the league. The Bears play the total opposite of the Colts. The Colts seem to not really care about defense, where the Bears seem to do the same on offense. If Cedric Benson has a great year running the ball, and the defense is atleast 75% of what it was last year, I see no reason as to why they can't win a Super Bowl. I would take the Bears over any team in the NFC becuase their defense is that much better than every other teams' in the NFC (yeah even without Briggs). They made their playoff run without 2 Pro Bowlers in Mike Brown and Tommie Harris, and that didn't seem to hurt them.
But in the NFC, it's not as hard to get to the Super Bowl as it is in the AFC. So your really only asking Rex to not hurt you in 2-3 games. I'll take may chances with that defense.
Here is the poster boy for any Quarterback can get your a ring
That argument holds no water because the Texans beat the Colts. Cowboys' fans are ing re s.Yeah I got such a kick out of all the Dallas fans who were at the SB party I went to. After the game they were all high-fiving each other and saying like "We really won the SB because we beat the Colts in the season YEAH!" Whatever makes you feel better, I guess...
Lions go 14-2, win division and march to a win in the Superbowl.
Re ed is thinking that the Texans are going 9-8.
I said it once and I'll say it again, it will be 6-11 for them . . . if they're lucky.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
