Page 44 of 106 FirstFirst ... 344041424344454647485494 ... LastLast
Results 1,076 to 1,100 of 2630
  1. #1076
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    Aldridge to the Cavs makes the most sense for both teams.

  2. #1077
    Veteran illusioNtEk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    1,981
    Giving up LMA and Green would be a huge defensive loss for us tbh

  3. #1078
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    The Nuggets and Pistons are being mentioned suddenly online. Nuggets have assets, Pistons have Dummond but not sure the Cavs want him with a similar player in Thompson already.

  4. #1079
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    39,737
    Wouldn't trade LMA, Green, Murray, and a first for Kyrie tbh. Maybe two of those but not all four.

  5. #1080
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    Giving up LMA and Green would be a huge defensive loss for us tbh
    Yep. Would hate to lose both.

  6. #1081
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    Wouldn't trade LMA, Green, Murray, and a first for Kyrie tbh. Maybe two of those but not all four.
    Agreed, but it would likely take us losing at least 3 of the above to make anything happen. Murray would certainly be gone.

  7. #1082
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    282
    The one thing that Kyrie can say, is that he won't resign with any team, other than the ones that he originally mentioned. This will force CLE to focus on those teams only. I don't believe any team will give up valuable assets just to get Kyrie for two years imo. If he doesn't give a promise to be there for the long haul, I believe a lot of teams will back off trying to pursue him.

  8. #1083
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    Cavs-Bledsoe, Green, Murray+ Spurs 1st

    Suns-LMA, Frye

    Spurs- Irving, Chandler


    That's the best possible/realistic deal including Spurs I've seen

  9. #1084
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    The one thing that Kyrie can say, is that he won't resign with any team, other than the ones that he originally mentioned. This will force CLE to focus on those teams only. I don't believe any team will give up valuable assets just to get Kyrie for two years imo. If he doesn't give a promise to be there for the long haul, I believe a lot of teams will back off trying to pursue him.
    As much as I want to believe this to be true, there are a lot of dumb GM's who would risk damaging a franchise's future to sell tickets for at least two seasons: DET/PHX/DEN All whom have better assets than SAS.

  10. #1085
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    39,737
    Agreed, but it would likely take us losing at least 3 of the above to make anything happen. Murray would certainly be gone.
    Could trade White and Murray alongside one of LMA/Green. Trading both of those two leaves several gaping holes on the roster that would take years to fix unless Cousins is brought on next year after all.

  11. #1086
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    If they really want him, they will have him. They have by far the most assets. I think the Cavs won't care that it's a division rival if they bring back a huge haul. If they have Lebron, they're still the better team. And if Lebron leaves next summer, it won't matter anyway.



  12. #1087
    Mostly good takes Dverde's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    4,162
    When in doubt look for MJ and the Bobcats.

  13. #1088
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    If they really want him, they will have him. They have by far the most assets. I think the Cavs won't care that it's a division rival if they bring back a huge haul. If they have Lebron, they're still the better team. And if Lebron leaves next summer, it won't matter anyway.


    Yes, but for some reason, I think LeBron would be pissed if Cavs strengthened the one team that could beat them next year. Plus they'd have to trade Isaiah. Not sure they would.

  14. #1089
    Veteran RD2191's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    51,864
    Wouldn't trade LMA, Green, Murray, and a first for Kyrie tbh. Maybe two of those but not all four.
    Now that I think about it that does seem like too much.

  15. #1090
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    If they really want him, they will have him. They have by far the most assets. I think the Cavs won't care that it's a division rival if they bring back a huge haul. If they have Lebron, they're still the better team. And if Lebron leaves next summer, it won't matter anyway.


    Zero chance Cleveland does a trade like this. They might as well trade 'Bron now if they do. He's running that franchise anyway, and if they have any hope of keeping him next year, it ain't going to be trading with their primary rival in the east.

  16. #1091
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    4,770
    Lowe reports from the Cavaliers' perspective: "There is little chance of salvaging their relationship with him," but the team is confident they can bring back a 'king's ransom' in a potential trade.
    So Kyrie is the Cavs version of JSimmons I guess.

  17. #1092
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    We have to be careful. Kyrie is a great scorer (though he takes crazy shots), but his defense is horrid. He made Murray look like an all-star. So a trade for him helps on one side, but hurts on the other as we would have to give up several good defenders to get him. Not sure giving up Green and LMA makes sense as it will really hurt on the defensive side of the ball and the Spurs claim to fame the last two years has been their defense.

  18. #1093
    Wolf Ruvinskis tonight...you's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    6,497
    Cavs-Bledsoe, Green, Murray+ Spurs 1st

    Suns-LMA, Frye

    Spurs- Irving, Chandler


    That's the best possible/realistic deal including Spurs I've seen
    And that would be a big Yuck from me. I hate to see that much defense leave the team along with a prospect and a pick.

  19. #1094
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495

  20. #1095
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Wouldn't trade LMA, Green, Murray, and a first for Kyrie tbh. Maybe two of those but not all four.
    Now that I think about it that does seem like too much.
    No it isn't. Aldridge is garbage and will be gone for nothing after this season if we don't trade him, Murray is a 29th pick who don't even know if will amount to anything someday, same thing with the late first round pick.

    Green is the piece that I would have more problem parting with, but he's a role player that can't do anything but defend and shoot threes at a slightly above average level, and he's already on the decline. He's only going to get worse from here and his last season was already nothing to write home about, tbh.

  21. #1096
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Im sure Leroids is working hard for Kylie not to go to the Spurs

    Since Lebron owns the team. Not gona happen

  22. #1097
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Zero chance Cleveland does a trade like this. They might as well trade 'Bron now if they do. He's running that franchise anyway, and if they have any hope of keeping him next year, it ain't going to be trading with their primary rival in the east.
    Celtics are hording 1st rounders like they are going to be outlawed soon.

    Trade Idea:

    Jalen Brown
    Jae Crowder
    Marcus Smart
    2018 Celtics 1st round pick
    2019 Memphis pick (top 6 protected, top 8 in 2020)

    For

    Kyrie Irving

    would assume that would be the offer, not a bad haul for the Cavs. They should make a more independent of Lebron, do what's best for their franchise.

    PG-Thomas
    SG-Irving
    SF-Hayward
    PF-Horford
    C-Baynes


    PG-Rose-Smart-Calderon
    SG-Smith-Korver
    SF-Lebron-Crowder-Brown
    PF-Love-Jeff Green
    C-Thompson-Frye
    Last edited by cd021; 07-24-2017 at 03:23 PM.

  23. #1098
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    We have to be careful. Kyrie is a great scorer (though he takes crazy shots), but his defense is horrid. He made Murray look like an all-star. So a trade for him helps on one side, but hurts on the other as we would have to give up several good defenders to get him. Not sure giving up Green and LMA makes sense as it will really hurt on the defensive side of the ball and the Spurs claim to fame the last two years has been their defense.
    No one on that team plays D, Lue doesn't hold them accountable. I'm guessing it would be different under Pop for Kyrie.

    And it would help elsewhere, as teams wouldn't be able to hide someone on Parker/Murray/Mills at their defensive end.

  24. #1099
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    No it isn't. Aldridge is garbage and will be gone for nothing after this season if we don't trade him, Murray is a 29th pick who don't even know if will amount to anything someday, same thing with the late first round pick.

    Green is the piece that I would have more problem parting with, but he's a role player that can't do anything but defend and shoot threes at a slightly above average level, and he's already on the decline. He's only going to get worse from here and his last season was already nothing to write home about, tbh.
    The problem with moving Green is you'd probably have to take Shumpert back. I'd still do it to land Irving, and Shumpert could be a valuable expiring in 2018-19, but I'd much rather keep Green.

  25. #1100
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    Celtics are hording 1st rounders like they are going to be outlawed soon.

    Jalen Brown
    Jae Crowder
    Marcus Smart
    2018 Celtics 1st round pick
    2019 Memphis pick (top 6 protected, top 8 in 2020)

    would assume that would be the offer, not a bad haul for the Cavs. They should make a more independent of Lebron, do what's best for their franchise.

    PG-Thomas
    SG-Irving
    SF-Hayward
    PF-Horford
    C-Baynes
    D. Murray could average 30 against that backcourt. If they get Kyrie, they'd have to give up Thomas. But I don't see them trading w/ Celtics.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •