why don't you expand on this?
because something gives angel luv pause.
what do you got in your head about it?
As always, I take your foaming-at-the-mouth Red Scare analysis with all the care and diligence it requires.
why don't you expand on this?
because something gives angel luv pause.
what do you got in your head about it?
What you THINK I've got in my head; but that is not reasonable; which I fully admit.
SO, I don't know what to think. Did Obama misspeak? It's not a question about what I have in MY head; what did he have in HIS head when he suggested we ought to have a security force, AS POWERFUL as our military - in this country?
I don't know; and he hasn't said it since.
Now, if Cheney had ever said that, I'm betting we would have heard more about it.
It could mean he wants to form a liberal Gestapo charged with rounding up all of Sarah Palin's "real" Americans into a re-education camp...or it could just be a typically vague pre-election fundraising speech, and all he's really after is more funding for nuke detection at ports. I vote based on personality and temperment, not stated campaign speeches. After all, if I took everything a Presidential candidate said as gospel, I would have had to vote for the 2000 candidate who said this:
...and we all know how that turned out, don't we?
He's talking about his community service initiatives.
Here's a column on it, and it's by no means in favor of the idea, but a key quote for anyone who is taking the worst case interpretation of the statement:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/...nal_secur.htmlThe entire plan is breathtaking in its scope. But it does not, as at least one internet writer has suggested, portend a "giant police force." It would be easier to rebut if it did. As it is, it's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams.
Yes, let's let this thread devolve into a discussion of 9/11, - lies getting us into Iraq; why don't we bring up Monica Lewinski while we're at it. We've never had a thread about that before.
The speaches are meaningless?
What the candidates are saying doesn't matter.
Then you think what Obama says and what he is going to do could be completely different.
You sound like Sean Hannity.
He said "National Security Force" but meant "Community Service Initiatives"?
I've probably led too sheltered of a life. Maybe he speaking ebonics or something. It gets lost in the translation.
I think every President-elect has a plan, and then the very first thing they do when they step into the Oval Office is get punched in the mouth.
not from him. he would've said " you" and "i don't care".
and there you have it ladies and gentlemen. you can't keep that caged up forever.![]()
why is that funny ? I guess you are implying racism ? bigotry ? -- typical..
Keep what caged up?
Clever, racially tinged humor?
Guilty.
101A,
Oh snap! You one crazy cracker! You're one funny honky!
Racially tinged, yes. Clever... eh, debatable.
only minorities speak ebonics ? and aren't you racially tinged with your reply?
I used to think BRHornets was the most ignorant member here.
You my friend, take the tiara home on this one. Youre a real piece of work.
Why dont you go dig a hole in the ground and climb in while you wait for the end of the world, eh? I mean it isnt that much different than having your head in the sand for your entire life, now is it?
so does that mean only minorities speak ebonics as you understand it ? I mean if you go off of the original intent on the meaning of the word - then it only applys to African Americans ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebonics
but does the urban understanding only encompass the color of the skin ? Can a white boy copy the urban hip hop black guy - adopt his mannerisms and speech ? Will he be speaking Ebonics or is it just stupid English if one is white ?
Last edited by implacable44; 11-03-2008 at 02:03 PM.
He still doesn't get it.
What kind of dumb- , ignorant question is that?
What next, do only Chinese people speak Chinese?
Is this your idea of intelligence, or did you study under Elmer Fudd himself?
dang, he must be really stupid to get this response from you. you're normally more diplomatic
It really makes plenty of sense if you read the article.
I honestly dont think he would "get it" if I used my more subtle powers of degradation.
It's so secret, he publicly announced it.I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?
He STILL doesn't get it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)