Just go back to the troll forum Oden. You are way over your head in here.
that's what bigots probably called the 60s protests of Nam
Just go back to the troll forum Oden. You are way over your head in here.
No! The media lies all goddamn day. You're the one who is always certain of your assumptions, remember?
will I get whacked if I disobey?
You're a good looking guy, but no thanks. I'm straight.
Sure can't tell it by your picture you posted.
sure, if you wanna believe that's me and jack off to that pic, go right ahead.
but let's stay on topic. You claim protesters should always obey every order given from the police. I say if that was the case in the 50s and 60s, we'd still have segregation and a war in Vietnam.
Try and keep up. You made the comment that the democrats were the party behind Jim Crow and then make comments about history.
What you say is true. After the voting rights act of 1965, minorities had the majority and pushed them from the positions of power. The old guard was courted by Nixon and migrated over to the GOP. I make no comments about the current cons uents of the GOP beyond to say that it is the party of the white segment of the baby boomers as it is currently constructed.
Thrumond and his ilk are long dead. My point is that while those obvious racists started off in the democratic party they ended their careers in the GOP.
if Cosmic had his way the Berlin Wall and Apartheid would still be standing![]()
And I am done responding to you, you ing idiot.
Who besides Strom Thurmond switched parties? He is the only one I am aware of.
And the history is undeniable. The Democratic party was the last bastion of segregation.
Are you serious?
Give me a break. The party structure starts at the precinct level on up. The majority of the racist nonsense went on at the county and state level.
The biggest indication of this trend was the change in Texas' primary system after the passage of the 24th amendment was going from the closed poll tax, literacy test system to the semiclosed system that is still in use today. It was specifically done so that they could begin voting in GOP primaries in their districts.
Go look at the county seats of Georgia, Alabama, Texas, South Carolina and Mississippi and its right there. Nixon saw the political clout and courted them. It culminated in the sea of red that was the 1980 election.
LOL I never disputed that conservatives have gradually drifted to the Republican party after the leadership of the Democratic party was seized by the radical left. Nixon certainly benefited by this drift but the wounds to the democratic party were more self inflicted than masterminded by Nixon. Those mainstream democrats had already become alienated from the party before they became Reagan Democrats.
I was there and I was detained along with my research team (i work at a major research university in the area, i study smart mobs). The cops corralled the demonstrators onto the bridge. They split them between the pedestrian walkway and and the traffic side. Once there the police blocked both exits of the bridge and arrested or detained everybody. The protesters didn't shut down the bridge, the cops led them them there. The plan was for the protesters to take the pedestrian walkway to Brooklyn to gather more people to then walk back to Liberty Park.
You guys are always slamming the liberal or conservative media yet you choose to believe them when it's convenient for you. This isn't a republican/democratic argument or "movement". It is much more politically diverse than you have been led to believe by mainstream media. But believe and interpret as you see fit...
You are on a "research team" that studies "smart mobs?"
sorry...
![]()
So why did ALL the media reports say that only the ones on the roadway were arrested and that the ones on the pedestrian walkway were not arrested. Are you saying they all lied?
Did anyone ever find a video of the "brutality"?
Did that go over your head, CC? It's okay to admit it.
Here CC, educate yourself for once. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_mob
This isn't spoon fed to you. You actually have to do some reading here.
You do a lot of assuming and generally sound like an ignorant asshole.
I absolutely served in the military---who the would make that up? Is there some kind of warped reason to invent that ?
I abso inlutely refused to wear my military uniform in public...I served honorably and thought nothing of it...if I had been a poseur---I would have worn my uniform out in public. Let me be clear here;
ANYONE in the military that wears their uniform in public---WITHOUT an official reason is nothing but a in' poseur....why the would you?
Wear it to your duty station or only on a military base or to some function where you have been ORDERED TO....otherwise who are you trying to impress?
That idiot in your class wearing a military uniform...???? WTF?
Does this moron not have a civilian wardrobe? Why the would he even wear that to a class? What a stupid poseur. If you are serving your country...there is absolutely no need to attempt to parade your uniform anywhere in public.
One last thing....regarding the OP video....
If I was this moron's commanding officer and I saw this video...I would call that poseur into my office and tell him who the does he think he is wearing his uniform out in public and making an ass out of the military? Is this idiot's political views the same views that the military shares? Because if you are out in public in uniform=====YOU ARE REPRESENTING THE MILITARY!!!!
And anything you say or do is just a good or bad reflection on the military....and I would absolutely suspend this idiot until an investigation could be completed....
uhhhh no. Thanks for asking.
I know what a "smart mob" is dumbass.
Clearly.
Whats your problem, ? Reading comprehension?
I find the fact that there are "research teams" studying "smart mobs" highly amusing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)