Reply With Quote
You wonder if Granger remembers Boylen. That sounds better.
If you had to play alongside scrubs like James Anderson you'd probably be depressed too.
You wonder if Granger remembers Boylen. That sounds better.
Sure, it works both ways, lol.
Granger has been ass all season
so has our non existent backup to Kawhi.
He's played like 29 games after playing only 5 the season before. I doubt he is done. He's only 30 which isn't too young or old. I'm sure he could turn it around on the Spurs.
Well, Granger has been ass this year, no way to argue otherwise. But to me, it's better than playing someone in Daye who's been ass his entire career
Manu has played well at the back up sf
Didn't say he was done, just saying he's been ass, if we sign him, better hope he doesn't get a lot of meaningful minutes
Funny, but not the actual choice facing the Spurs. Daye has zero chance of being in the playoff rotation. If they get Granger, his minutes come somewhere from the 4 players in the current wing rotation.Well, Granger has been ass this year, no way to argue otherwise. But to me, it's better than playing someone in Daye who's been ass his entire career
I hope he doesn't get bought out. I'd hate to see OKC or Miami get more depth off the bench. The Spurs can't beat either team as it is.
So hs Parker but we're suppose to ignore facts.
True - but there is still a lot of regular season left too and the need for a back up SF is key (especially if there are more injuries). But in the event spurs play Kawhi at PF, I still like keeping DG at SG which leaves Manu/Beli/Boris for the SF. Just good to have another option.
Granger didn't light up the NBA playoffs and finals 6 months ago and lead his country to a championship directly after.
Ya, I wouldn't oppose a signing of Granger, I'd be cool with it, I just stated that he's terrible now because I see a lot of people discussing him like he's still an All-Star caliber player
I also question the fit, since Granger has been known as a ball hog and chucker, even in his prime..
To be fair, the other players I want(Clark, World Peace) are also coming off poor seasons and have serious question marks, tbh..I'd prefer Clark because he's 26 and athletic, and I'd take World Peace because he's a proven winner that adds toughness/intimidation..
Didn't he play 5 games last year? He's been dealing with injuries issues the last two seasons. That doesn't men he's not worth a pickup. A roster with Bonner, Baynes Daye, Ayres, Cojo and you wanna talk about Granger being ass?
Parker: 17ppg on 50% & 6 apg
Granger: 8ppg on 35% 1 apg
Options are good.
These things never end well for the spurs.he will either end up somehow with miami or okc, or something stupid and flashy like new york or brooklyn or something LOL
I see granger's value in being able to score in the 1st unit tbh (something that has been a big problem so far this year). His minutes would come from Leonard mainly. I see it as a win/win ifthe spurs sign Granger. If he regains his old form he gives the spurs a bonafide 20+ game scorer who can also space the floor (something Leonard is not currently doing). Green has shown the ability to be the defensive "stopper" and can handle the opponents best player.
I see zero chance that Granger starts or takes minutes from Leonard.
Do you see any chance of the Spurs, if they get Granger, playing small more often? I don't know how effective Granger would be as a smallball 4 (with 3 guards and a big when Leonard is on the bench). Basically it would marginalize any big outside of the top 3, which is probably a good thing anyway.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions