Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 170
  1. #101
    Wolf Ruvinskis tonight...you's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    6,497
    I don't get why Chinook hates Manu so much if he came back for the minimum to play 10-15mpg i don't see a problem with that...he was the only guy playing his ass off against GS
    Yeah, even to the point of calling him a POS.
    I was going to say something, but I'm trying to be less argumentative right now.

    Doing that Zen and all... Trying to get on that Phil Jackson level where I can fail like crazy and still make tons of money.

  2. #102
    Like I said... tmtcsc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    7,148
    You seem to really be struggling with a basic concept. It doesn't matter if Manu's the best 13th man. It doesn't matter if he is the best the Spurs can get for the min. It doesn't matter if a jalopy is the best jalopy you can get for $300. Spend more and stop setting for things that can't get it done.

    This should be simple. Spend money and bring in someone better than Manu. That's it. Instead of grasping that, you try to pull out of context to cover up.
    Manu showed some flashes in the Rockets and Warriors series but most of his value at this point is in the locker room and team culture aspects. I'm being 100% serious about that. Pop spent that money on Manu as payback for his previous sacrifices and to have his actual presence on the team. KL has real limitations in the leadership category and TP has never been a team guy.

    That being said, I'd be shocked if the Spurs payed Manu anything near what they paid him last year. If he wants to come back, it will be on the Spurs' financial terms this go-round.

  3. #103
    R.C. Drunkford TimDunkem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    14,390
    Even 10 or 15 mpg is too much. If he's playing that many minutes, we're not good enough to even sniff a 6 game series against the Warriors.

  4. #104
    Wolf Ruvinskis tonight...you's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    6,497
    Even 10 or 15 mpg is too much. If he's playing that many minutes, we're not good enough to even sniff a 6 game series against the Warriors.
    As opposed to Patty taking those minutes? Maybe Simmons... if the team budges on his "number in his head"? That will provide the difference?

  5. #105
    Three And Counting ...
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    677
    Coming back as a coach? Only for the minimum. He will help with the development of Murray

  6. #106
    R.C. Drunkford TimDunkem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    14,390
    As opposed to Patty taking those minutes? Maybe Simmons... if the team budges on his "number in his head"? That will provide the difference?
    I don't want Patty either, tbh.

    I'm not against Manu coming back. On the contrary, I want him back but he might want too much money AND Pop will certainly overplay him.

  7. #107
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I don't get why Chinook hates Manu so much if he came back for the minimum to play 10-15mpg i don't see a problem with that...he was the only guy playing his ass off against GS
    I don't hate Manu, and I don't hate Tony. Just want neither on the team going forward. The Spurs need to actually fix their rotation, especially their backcourt. That means they need to spend money to get a better sixth man than Ginobili.

    Yeah, even to the point of calling him a POS.
    Never called him that. If you believe I did, you also think that I don't know the difference between $300 and $2.4 Million. The point is that you don't cheap out on things you need by claiming what you settled for is good value for the price. You spend more than $300 on a car, and you spend more than the min on a new sixth man.

  8. #108
    Wolf Ruvinskis tonight...you's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    6,497
    I don't hate Manu, and I don't hate Tony. Just want neither on the team going forward. The Spurs need to actually fix their rotation, especially their backcourt. That means they need to spend money to get a better sixth man than Ginobili.



    Never called him that. If you believe I did, you also think that I don't know the difference between $300 and $2.4 Million. The point is that you don't cheap out on things you need by claiming what you settled for is good value for the price. You spend more than $300 on a car, and you spend more than the min on a new sixth man.
    Sorry, you alluded to him as a POS car in your cute little emoji post earlier.
    My bad. I must not know the difference between 300 mill and 2.4 now. I hang my head is shame.

  9. #109
    Kori's nightmare SpurOutofTownFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    4,381
    It depends on what the Spurs do to make the space. They'd have plenty of room if they dump LMA for example, and they could use some of that excess on a guard. And if they do trade LMA, would they get a guard back or a pick they'd use on a guard? Would the Spurs re-sign Mills and run Patty/Murray as their backup guards?

    It's not clean cut. Right now (meaning barring trades or stretching Tony), it really doesn't look like Paul is an option, but they still will have the cap room to go after other guys.
    Signing Paul won't be about money. If Paul comes to the Spurs wouldn't be because the Spurs paid him more. In fact, the Spurs can't pay him more than the Clippers, period. They would have to make draconian moves to make that happen. So, in summary, if Paul joins the Spurs it would be for much less money and it would be because Paul believes he can win a ring with the Spurs as they are - with some minor changes.

    The analysis most people are doing regarding cap space to get Paul is flawed for the reasons above.

    The Spurs today don't have a reliable ball handler to play playoff-level BB and Manu was the closest thing to that after TP and KL went down. Manu will sign with the Spurs for vet min, he already got his moneybags contract. Manu isn't interested in going to another team for 3-5 more M than what he can get with the Spurs. He will retire a Spur and FO already knows that. They need him in this transitional period.

    Most people want Manu out because he's old, that's it. It's illogical any other way to ask for a guy to not be in the roster when the guy was one of the few people who played the offseason decently. If you take the age factor out of the conversation everyone would be ok with Manu coming back.

    Stop being ridiculous.

  10. #110
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Signing Paul won't be about money.
    Stop being ridiculous.
    You already said it for me.

  11. #111
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    so, he's getting a raise, amiright?

  12. #112
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    Chris Paul is not worthy of Max money. I hope the Spurs don't burn all their space on him. I'd like him on the team for 20 to 25 Mill at most.
    THAT ain't happening! Might as well say you don't want Paul.

  13. #113
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I don't think Green is going anywhere. The whole point of Spurs/Paul alliance would be to have strongest team possible and trading away Green flies in the face of that.

    If he signs, the most logical scenario would be a 1+1 contract worth $25M in 1st season, opting out after and signing a 4 year max. He'd make "only" $10M less than Clippers can offer.
    I hope this is the case.

  14. #114
    '99 '03 '05 '07 '14 PopTheGOAT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    1,586
    So a wasted year of Kawhi's prime? Cool.
    So what do you suggest in order to not "waste a year"?

  15. #115
    Veteran spursistan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    14,864
    That's a pretty re ed anology, tbh.

    First of all, Manu isn't a piece of . In fact, he's probably the best car available at 300 hundred bucks.

    And second, the Spurs are already planning on not settling and paying more, a lot more, for a guard. Just on the PG position, which is a much bigger need than SG.

    Dude, you want to sign Okafor. You really shouldn't be arguing so hard about rosters moves considering that if you were the Spurs GM Kawhi would probably not be in San Antonio because of lack of respect, tbh.

    "Danny Green is a better defender than Kawhi".
    Aldridge should be the number one option over Kawhi".
    ..

    Chinook is great capologist, maybe best on ST, but holy he sucks at talent evaluation ..
    Last edited by spursistan; 06-20-2017 at 06:39 PM.

  16. #116
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    ..

    Chinook is great capologist, maybe best on ST, but holy he sucks at talent evaulation ..
    Yup


  17. #117
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    I'd love to have manu back if he understands that he's going to have a smaller role than last year.

    10-12 mpg and I'd welcome back the second best Argentine athlete behind Diego.

  18. #118
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    Yeah, even to the point of calling him a POS.
    I was going to say something, but I'm trying to be less argumentative right now.

    Doing that Zen and all... Trying to get on that Phil Jackson level where I can fail like crazy and still make tons of money.
    AAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...

  19. #119
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    Have we established this yet? I haven't seen it. Also, local news reported that Manu may take much longer to decide. If that's the case, he'd probably have to weigh taking much less than he made this year.
    Yea, apparently Woj said it in his article re: Pau

    There have been positive indications recently that Ginobili, 39, is leaning toward returning for his 16th season with San Antonio, but no final decision has been made, league sources said.
    https://sports.yahoo.com/sources-pau...150055120.html

  20. #120
    Believe. Taking it to the Hole's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    696
    So we are leaning towards wasting another year of Kawhi's prime I suppose? Instead of cap flexibility it seems PATFO want cap inflexibility. Sometimes I think they are deliberately sabotaging the organization.

  21. #121
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    If Manu waits and absorbs what salary is left after the Spurs make their moves I'm all for it.

  22. #122
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    Weird. On one hand, he played well to close out the season. On the other, he will only get worse as he gets older and I'm not excited about the day when I hope he never leaves the bench. Oh well, he is a leader and if we have international players, he tends to be a role model. I think he and Patty are why foreign born players love it here. I guess that can't be a bad thing.

  23. #123
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    2,007
    ..

    Chinook is great capologist, maybe best on ST, but holy he sucks at talent evaluation ..
    Been saying this for a while

  24. #124
    Like I said... tmtcsc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    7,148
    So we are leaning towards wasting another year of Kawhi's prime I suppose? Instead of cap flexibility it seems PATFO want cap inflexibility. Sometimes I think they are deliberately sabotaging the organization.
    I think they are in "Win Now" mode to be honest. This needs to play out first before we can correctly judge the F.O.'s intentions. Are they not creating cap space in order to try and win now? If they were to waste a year, I imagine they would go cheap and let 2017-2018 play out in hopes of scoring big in 2018 FA.

    I want them to move TP's contract next. Just a straight salary dump. I wouldn't mind seeing Danny Green stay but he should come off the bench. He's not starter material. Spurs need more scoring threat from that position.

  25. #125
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    Like $2.4 Million
    But irrelevant as they'll sign him after FA is over and can go over cap then.

    Hear you on not wanting to punt guard for another year, but name an option on the market that won't cost an arm and a leg. SG looks bad.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •