Reply With Quote
My new jerb.
ah...when you got the ticket references...I figured it was somewhere near the metroplex. what's in NYC?
My new jerb.
Obama born in Kenya..but to claim without evidence that there is a pizza shop in DC running a child sex ring with the close involvement of the clintons and podestas is just being a conspiracy nut
Bengazi...
Missing Emails...
Clinton Murders...
George Soro...
The Deepstate...
To name just a few....the right loves themselves some conspiracies
dont forget 9/11 being an inside job
Or the 911 commission report being comprehensive....dont forget 9/11 being an inside job
or that it was ever purported to be. its not like there was a NIST report or something
In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" to attack anyone who challenges the "official" narrative.
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.
3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:
a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.
***
4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:
a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.
***
b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …
***
c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.
***
d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.
***
f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.
g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….
5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.
What should I call you when you say you believe in a conspiracy theory, Chris?In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" to attack anyone who challenges the "official" narrative.
An info warrior!!!
congrats. i'm proud of you.
so the report was left intentionally non comprehensive?
Thanks, but I'm certainly going to miss the last 3 months of getting paid to sit on my ass and not do any work
The report said exactly what it was going to cover. Detailed engineering wasn't one of them. Mostly because everyone knows planes hit the buildings and they fell down.
But you know all this after 17 years. Why don't you just make the choice to not be disingenuous?
You, of all people, ing about conspiracies
Believing in Alex Jones conspiracies almost inherently means being disingenuous.
Lololololol
comrade tsa
Patriots owner Robert Kraft engaged to girlfriend Dr. Dana Blumberg, according to reports
https://www.wcvb.com/article/robert-...2022/39343862#
Hopefully he paid more than $59 for that one, tbhPatriots owner Robert Kraft engaged to girlfriend Dr. Dana Blumberg, according to reports
https://www.wcvb.com/article/robert-...2022/39343862#
3 years later how's det going?
Took a job in DC instead.
3years later how's det going?
He's gonna pay a whole lot more
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
